Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
2 is the norm. Some kids are earlier. Some later. It all works out in the end.
Not the poster you quoted, but no, 2 really isn't the norm. It might be the norm in 2013 in DC because people are trying to actively teach babies the alphabet and numbers. But in the world in general, 2 is very young for this.
+1. I'm from Germany and we don't make toddlers memorize letters and numbers there. Most kids, even from educated families, start learning to read in first grade.
This is actually an educational philosophy, yes? My sister went to Waldorf school where they made no effort to teach reading before I think second grade? Somehow all the children turned out not just literate, but also most are doing extraordinary things.
I am an Easten European and don't know of anyone reading before age 5. Elementary school starts at get 7. However, the curriculum is much rigorous. Doing pretty elaborate proofs starts at fifth grade.
+100.
I also don't get the "my baby could read at 3" humble brag. At some point during the 12 years of learning, the European kids pass Americans kids when it comes to academics.Not sure how it happens or even when....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
2 is the norm. Some kids are earlier. Some later. It all works out in the end.
Not the poster you quoted, but no, 2 really isn't the norm. It might be the norm in 2013 in DC because people are trying to actively teach babies the alphabet and numbers. But in the world in general, 2 is very young for this.
+1. I'm from Germany and we don't make toddlers memorize letters and numbers there. Most kids, even from educated families, start learning to read in first grade.
This is actually an educational philosophy, yes? My sister went to Waldorf school where they made no effort to teach reading before I think second grade? Somehow all the children turned out not just literate, but also most are doing extraordinary things.
I am an Easten European and don't know of anyone reading before age 5. Elementary school starts at get 7. However, the curriculum is much rigorous. Doing pretty elaborate proofs starts at fifth grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
2 is the norm. Some kids are earlier. Some later. It all works out in the end.
Not the poster you quoted, but no, 2 really isn't the norm. It might be the norm in 2013 in DC because people are trying to actively teach babies the alphabet and numbers. But in the world in general, 2 is very young for this.
+1. I'm from Germany and we don't make toddlers memorize letters and numbers there. Most kids, even from educated families, start learning to read in first grade.
This is actually an educational philosophy, yes? My sister went to Waldorf school where they made no effort to teach reading before I think second grade? Somehow all the children turned out not just literate, but also most are doing extraordinary things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
2 is the norm. Some kids are earlier. Some later. It all works out in the end.
Not the poster you quoted, but no, 2 really isn't the norm. It might be the norm in 2013 in DC because people are trying to actively teach babies the alphabet and numbers. But in the world in general, 2 is very young for this.
+1. I'm from Germany and we don't make toddlers memorize letters and numbers there. Most kids, even from educated families, start learning to read in first grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
2 is the norm. Some kids are earlier. Some later. It all works out in the end.
Not the poster you quoted, but no, 2 really isn't the norm. It might be the norm in 2013 in DC because people are trying to actively teach babies the alphabet and numbers. But in the world in general, 2 is very young for this.
+1. I'm from Germany and we don't make toddlers memorize letters and numbers there. Most kids, even from educated families, start learning to read in first grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DD is nearly 3.5 and can sound out each letter (I have not taught her the names of letters or the alphabet song); write nearly all of them (except the M, N and W) if presented with an example; and recognize a handful of sight words: I, am, the, a, ball, etc. She can write her 5-letter name unaided.
She can count to 10, but gets the teens jumbled up, and is starting to add with her fingers.
She is going to Montessori preschool in a week, where all of this will be reinforced and built on.
Note that my older son could not do any of this at that age, and is now reading and doing maths WAY beyond his grade level. Sometimes it just clicks later.
You don't know much about Montessori, do you?!
I have spent many years immersed in the Montessori method.
My older son, an ex-preemie like OP's, with developmental delays, benefited enormously from going to a Montessori preschool. The excellent teaching there contributed significantly to his amazing progress.
Don't be so rude.
If you have spent many years immersed in Montessori, you would know that your kid's future teachers do not want you "teaching" him the way you have been. Nor do they want you to focus so blindly on random things like memorizing a song or series of numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DD is nearly 3.5 and can sound out each letter (I have not taught her the names of letters or the alphabet song); write nearly all of them (except the M, N and W) if presented with an example; and recognize a handful of sight words: I, am, the, a, ball, etc. She can write her 5-letter name unaided.
She can count to 10, but gets the teens jumbled up, and is starting to add with her fingers.
She is going to Montessori preschool in a week, where all of this will be reinforced and built on.
Note that my older son could not do any of this at that age, and is now reading and doing maths WAY beyond his grade level. Sometimes it just clicks later.
You don't know much about Montessori, do you?!
I have spent many years immersed in the Montessori method.
My older son, an ex-preemie like OP's, with developmental delays, benefited enormously from going to a Montessori preschool. The excellent teaching there contributed significantly to his amazing progress.
Don't be so rude.
Anonymous wrote:Could sing the song around 18-24 months and recite the numbers to ten around then. Between 2-2.5 he learned to count, recognize the numerals up to 20, and recognize all the letters independently.
Whether that seems young or old, I will add that both DH and I were early readers (learning between 3 and 4 on our own) and he has two grandfathers, 3 uncles, and 2 aunts who are mathematicians and engineers. So we are not surprised by his comfort with and interest in numbers, nor are we pushing/drilling/quizzing/emphasizing any of these skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. My kid did it at 6. He had delays but now he is an honor roll student. 6 is late but 2 is hardly the norm.
2 is the norm. Some kids are earlier. Some later. It all works out in the end.
Not the poster you quoted, but no, 2 really isn't the norm. It might be the norm in 2013 in DC because people are trying to actively teach babies the alphabet and numbers. But in the world in general, 2 is very young for this.
+1. I'm from Germany and we don't make toddlers memorize letters and numbers there. Most kids, even from educated families, start learning to read in first grade.