Anonymous wrote:Maybe Starr should let us all know the percentage of third graders who achieved a final average of P in math and reading this year. That is a better measure of how well kids are learning what they are being taught than MSA.
The upcoming test, PARCC, will be much harder than MSA. So, there was already an expectation that scores would go down when those tests start. Should we expect declining test scores for the foreseeable future?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is math under 2.0 "deeper"? I'm not trying to be a pain, just generally curious. I just don't really understand how concepts like arithmetic and fractions are made deeper. Is it just more repetition or something?
Pretty much.
No, it is not just more repetition, although it is also more repetition (i.e., practice).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MD officials are admitting that they rushed into a curriculum so fast that they did not have a chance to modify the tests to gauge if the children were successful in learning what they were taught. The new curriculum is unproven, and now MD educators don't think their own tests are valid points of measurements to gauge if the curriculum is successful.
No, this is inaccurate. Maryland (along with most other states) has switched to the Common Core. The MSAs were not designed for the Common Core. There are tests that are designed for the Common Core, which Maryland will start using soon. Starr wanted to stop using the MSAs, which were not designed for the Common Core, but was not allowed to.
I am and I do. I am global.
How nice for you. So why do you have your child(ren) in MCPS?
Anonymous wrote:
I am sorry. The goal of math education really should not be explaining basic math operation in English. And I surely hope they don't teacher the alternative algorithm nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is math under 2.0 "deeper"? I'm not trying to be a pain, just generally curious. I just don't really understand how concepts like arithmetic and fractions are made deeper. Is it just more repetition or something?
Have you seen how your child needs to explain or solve math problems in multiple ways? I believe that is what is seen as deeper- going beyond being able to get the answer and understanding different ways to get there and why the answer is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:I am and I do. I am global.
Anonymous wrote:What comparable large school system do you think is better overall than MCPS, and what information do you base this on?[/quote
I may have to travel to South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Finland, Great Britain, ....
Huh. What parts of Vietnam have you been to. Certainly not the rural, poor areas.
Anonymous wrote:How is math under 2.0 "deeper"? I'm not trying to be a pain, just generally curious. I just don't really understand how concepts like arithmetic and fractions are made deeper. Is it just more repetition or something?
Anonymous wrote:What comparable large school system do you think is better overall than MCPS, and what information do you base this on?[/quote
I may have to travel to South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Finland, Great Britain, ....
then by all means please go -- so over all of this crap
What comparable large school system do you think is better overall than MCPS, and what information do you base this on?[/quote
I may have to travel to South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Finland, Great Britain, ....
Anonymous wrote:MSAs fell this year because of the overacceleration. MSAs fell for Grade 3 students in curriculum 2.0 because MSA does not measure grade 3 curriculum 2.0. How about some newly immigrant kids who school outside of America and come here and hit every local test out of the park even though MSA did not measure their "cheap and backwards" curriculum.
Holy cow! Holy feces! Enough with all the excuses. Simply admit the system sucks.