Anonymous wrote:IT is some what of a different animal. There are people in my dept making over $200k with no degree. They come up through the ranks back in the day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If two people apply for a job and one went to University of Minnesota and one went to Dartmouth, the only thing that will matter is who nails the job interview.
Where do you live? I'm sorry but this is just not true in DC. School snobbery is alive and well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If two people apply for a job and one went to University of Minnesota and one went to Dartmouth, the only thing that will matter is who nails the job interview.
Where do you live? I'm sorry but this is just not true in DC. School snobbery is alive and well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If two people apply for a job and one went to University of Minnesota and one went to Dartmouth, the only thing that will matter is who nails the job interview.
Where do you live? I'm sorry but this is just not true in DC. School snobbery is alive and well.
Anonymous wrote:Most of the top colleges and universities DO NOT offer merit aid. They meet some or all financial need only. And in general most of the well-known colleges and universities in major northeast cities and other desirable locations don't offer merit aid because they don't need to. There are plenty of people willing to pay to pay full-price or take big loans to attend BU, BC, NYU, GWU, UMiami, USC.
When you move out of the northeast/midAtlantic/west coast, and especially if you step down a level in prestige, you find many private colleges and universities that offer merit aid, and some offer lots. Some of these schools don't cost nearly $60k even at full price, making them more "affordable" (cough cough) in the first place.
If you are seeking affordable alternatives to in-state public universities, do not look to schools on the coasts. Look to the mid-west and the south. Lower tuition, less competition for slots, and often merit aid for good students that can make them viable alternatives to in-state publics. These can be great options for a kid who would prefer a small school or who would like to go out of state.
Anonymous wrote:If two people apply for a job and one went to University of Minnesota and one went to Dartmouth, the only thing that will matter is who nails the job interview.
Anonymous wrote:Once you are in the real world it does not matter where you went to college. It is all about how you present yourself, speak, write, how hard you work, how creative you are, how dependable you are, how much useful information you actually learned at college. It does not matter if you went to Big State U or Private Preppy College, it just matters how you present yourself to the world when you have graduated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:'Anonymous wrote:I was look at Carleton, Williams, etc. for my DD, but there's no way we could afford it without going into debt. State it is for us, can't justify it.
Know a graduating senior whose offer at a selective liberal arts college was such that it would be much cheaper than the state schools she applied for. It's often the kids who would get the best financial aid packages at private institutions who don't even bother to apply, which is sad. (Not sure if this applies to you, though.)
I agree. For a lot of kids, private schools often turn out to be cheaper than state schools.
Details please? For us UMCP - in state - would be much cheaper than say Pomona, Kenyon, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH and I went to state for undergrad. I went to state also for law school and he went to a so-so priivate MBA School. We've both done fairly well. Our kid went to top Ivy and never had to prove to anyone how smart she was. Even Goldman Sachs CEOs know that they can't even buy their kids way into Havrard, Princeton, or Yale w/o a big donation. So, they know those kids are top brains. It is possible to go to University of Nowhere and end up at great places...but it's more likely to be a "diamond in the rough" star vs. a whole bunch of fellow workers from a class of Princeton or Harvard. And, then, the diamond in the rough may feel excluded and not part of the team.
So, yes, everything is possible...it's just harder to prove oneself coming from Nowheresville U
I find this interesting. I work with people from Ivy Leagues, and people from "Nowheresville U." I cannot say, from years of experience working with people from different universities, that the Ivy League grads clearly demonstrate "top brains." In fact, some of the sharpest and most well-rounded people are not from those schools. So when I meet someone with an Ivy degree, I do not make the assumption that they are smarter, and neither do most people around me. Anyway, workplace success is usually about much more than just 'top brains,' it's ability to communicate, inter-personal skills, ambition, sensitivity, wisdom.
My impression is that getting into an Ivy League isn't so much about being smart, as having some stand-out aspect of your background, the right background, coming from a legacy, and other factors that change with time. It's very arbitrary.