Anonymous wrote:For all of you who choose schools based on the socio-economic status of the children within the school I have two sincere questions for you.
A) If a school had 70 percent lower ses students but test scores around 89-94 percent proficient, would that school be acceptable to you? Why or why not?
B) Does it ever concern you that your throughly high SES school ( Lafayette, janney, Murch, Mann ) could be providing a pretty blah education but posting high test scores based on students privileged backgrounds?
In other words, so you employ any critical thinking to determining if the school is full of talented and committed educators? Or do you just want it full of rich kids?
Anonymous wrote:For all of you who choose schools based on the socio-economic status of the children within the school I have two sincere questions for you.
A) If a school had 70 percent lower ses students but test scores around 89-94 percent proficient, would that school be acceptable to you? Why or why not?
B) Does it ever concern you that your throughly high SES school ( Lafayette, janney, Murch, Mann ) could be providing a pretty blah education but posting high test scores based on students privileged backgrounds?
In other words, so you employ any critical thinking to determining if the school is full of talented and committed educators? Or do you just want it full of rich kids?
Anonymous wrote:The real question for Maury remains whether its scores will ever climb to the levels met by better performing schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I think Maury will have better upper grades in two years, and I think Watkins will always be kinda okay, but never really great unless there are big changes.
I think Maury needs to look at Brent to see what will happen to their upper grades.
I think Maury is well advised to pursue it's own solution for upper grades. Maury's 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade aren't experiencing the kind of attrition that Brent is in 5th. Not to say it's all rosy - never is, never will be, nowhere - but those grades have something unique to offer and there is a sense of community, among kids, parents, staff in those grades that I for one wouldn't easily compromise on. The 5th grade experience is pretty unique actually and may well be a model for others to follow.
Maybe I have this all wrong but I think the doomsday predictors just don't account for the fact that Maury's location and catchment area are different. For one thing, many parents live in Hill East and aren't all that squeamish about venturing Eo[L]P to look for middle school if that's what it takes.
Famous last words. Where are the white kids at Eliot-Hine? When are we going to see them? School year 2016-2017, when the big group of IB 3rd graders reaches 6th grade? Hope you're right but not holding my breath.
[/quote
Who said I'm white?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I think Maury will have better upper grades in two years, and I think Watkins will always be kinda okay, but never really great unless there are big changes.
I think Maury needs to look at Brent to see what will happen to their upper grades.
I think Maury is well advised to pursue it's own solution for upper grades. Maury's 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade aren't experiencing the kind of attrition that Brent is in 5th. Not to say it's all rosy - never is, never will be, nowhere - but those grades have something unique to offer and there is a sense of community, among kids, parents, staff in those grades that I for one wouldn't easily compromise on. The 5th grade experience is pretty unique actually and may well be a model for others to follow.
Maybe I have this all wrong but I think the doomsday predictors just don't account for the fact that Maury's location and catchment area are different. For one thing, many parents live in Hill East and aren't all that squeamish about venturing Eo[L]P to look for middle school if that's what it takes.