Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS asked at 3 if he could have one and I really couldn't think of a good reason not to let him have one.
How about "cultural appropriation"?
Anonymous wrote:weird that so many "forbidden" words are posted in here why is it that some can used them and some can't?
Anonymous wrote:I think they look like total garbage on kids. I’m sure it’s because of a little boy who once lived near me. He always smelled of urine, was dirty, in dirty clothes with food always on his face. The parents were trash. Now when I see a Mohawk on a little kid all I see are those trashy people and that poor boy.
Anonymous wrote:I can understand teenagers, on the right teen, it can be a very cool look. But for kindergarteners? Why? Because mommy wants Johnny to be a bad-ass?
It just looks stupid, silly, trashy, red necky (not as much as the mullet/rat tail combo on a 7 year old, of course).
Let's hear why, moms of mohawk boys.
Anonymous wrote:Life is so much better once you ease up, embrace variety and realize that harsh judgment of other people's appearances makes YOU appear mighty small minded.
Anonymous wrote:It's for poors and the middleish income people with down market sensibilities.
Mohawk's sister will invariably have her ears pierced too young, too.
Anonymous wrote:It looks like some PP's are speaking of 'spiking' a child's hair, which is one thing. I had a preschool student who had a real Mohawk, though...shaved sides and all...and his hair made an otherwise sweet boy look like a little punk. I think they are trashy.