Anonymous wrote:Say, I know what would fix that. Here's what we do, we find some land that no one wants to live on, set up some villages and towns, and move the poor out there - you know, kind of like a special place that's reserved just for them. That way, we don't have to accommodate their needs in the District and they can get special help and live only among their own. It worked with the Cherokee in 1831. Why not the poor in 2013? They'd get exercise too if we made them march out there!Anonymous wrote:
You've just explained in a nutshell why DCPS is going to suck as a school system until gentrification progresses much further than it already has. Unemployment among young people in DC is around 50% because we've pursued policies that ensure the poorest of the region's poor must live in the District. Fortunately that is changing. Hopefully in 5 years from now, unemployment among DC's young people will be around 20%. And MD's (and VA's) will be similar.
So long as the purpose of all of the District's institutions is to remediate regional poverty, those institutions are going to suck at what they're nominally supposed to be doing.
You know what they say about people being too dumb to learn from history....
Anonymous wrote:Say, I know what would fix that. Here's what we do, we find some land that no one wants to live on, set up some villages and towns, and move the poor out there - you know, kind of like a special place that's reserved just for them. That way, we don't have to accommodate their needs in the District and they can get special help and live only among their own. It worked with the Cherokee in 1831. Why not the poor in 2013? They'd get exercise too if we made them march out there!Anonymous wrote:
You've just explained in a nutshell why DCPS is going to suck as a school system until gentrification progresses much further than it already has. Unemployment among young people in DC is around 50% because we've pursued policies that ensure the poorest of the region's poor must live in the District. Fortunately that is changing. Hopefully in 5 years from now, unemployment among DC's young people will be around 20%. And MD's (and VA's) will be similar.
So long as the purpose of all of the District's institutions is to remediate regional poverty, those institutions are going to suck at what they're nominally supposed to be doing.
You know what they say about people being too dumb to learn from history....
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you tell that to a teenager who can't read properly who happens to be lucky that I'm paying my own money for a reading tutor to teach her how to read. She has no clue what is ahead of her if she can't get this skill down but she's basically a good kid who goes to school every day and does her homework and gets passed along from year to year. There are thousands of kids like her in the system coming out into a job market that no longer has decent-paying manufacturing jobs for people with limited education. It's easy to dismiss them as not doing enough to seize opportunity but even the kids who are trying to "seize opportunity" are suffering from deficits that started way back when they were toddlers. If you want the city to function properly there needs to be more friggin' opportunity to seize.Anonymous wrote:The poor get plenty of uplift and plenty of opportunity in this city - far more than most other places - but not enough of the poor do their own part and seize opportunity - instead, many rely on the handouts as a core part of their regular living rather than as what is supposed to be a temporary boost to give them a hand and lift them out of poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you tell that to a teenager who can't read properly who happens to be lucky that I'm paying my own money for a reading tutor to teach her how to read. She has no clue what is ahead of her if she can't get this skill down but she's basically a good kid who goes to school every day and does her homework and gets passed along from year to year. There are thousands of kids like her in the system coming out into a job market that no longer has decent-paying manufacturing jobs for people with limited education. It's easy to dismiss them as not doing enough to seize opportunity but even the kids who are trying to "seize opportunity" are suffering from deficits that started way back when they were toddlers. If you want the city to function properly there needs to be more friggin' opportunity to seize.Anonymous wrote:The poor get plenty of uplift and plenty of opportunity in this city - far more than most other places - but not enough of the poor do their own part and seize opportunity - instead, many rely on the handouts as a core part of their regular living rather than as what is supposed to be a temporary boost to give them a hand and lift them out of poverty.
Say, I know what would fix that. Here's what we do, we find some land that no one wants to live on, set up some villages and towns, and move the poor out there - you know, kind of like a special place that's reserved just for them. That way, we don't have to accommodate their needs in the District and they can get special help and live only among their own. It worked with the Cherokee in 1831. Why not the poor in 2013? They'd get exercise too if we made them march out there!Anonymous wrote:
You've just explained in a nutshell why DCPS is going to suck as a school system until gentrification progresses much further than it already has. Unemployment among young people in DC is around 50% because we've pursued policies that ensure the poorest of the region's poor must live in the District. Fortunately that is changing. Hopefully in 5 years from now, unemployment among DC's young people will be around 20%. And MD's (and VA's) will be similar.
So long as the purpose of all of the District's institutions is to remediate regional poverty, those institutions are going to suck at what they're nominally supposed to be doing.
Yeah, you tell that to a teenager who can't read properly who happens to be lucky that I'm paying my own money for a reading tutor to teach her how to read. She has no clue what is ahead of her if she can't get this skill down but she's basically a good kid who goes to school every day and does her homework and gets passed along from year to year. There are thousands of kids like her in the system coming out into a job market that no longer has decent-paying manufacturing jobs for people with limited education. It's easy to dismiss them as not doing enough to seize opportunity but even the kids who are trying to "seize opportunity" are suffering from deficits that started way back when they were toddlers. If you want the city to function properly there needs to be more friggin' opportunity to seize.Anonymous wrote:The poor get plenty of uplift and plenty of opportunity in this city - far more than most other places - but not enough of the poor do their own part and seize opportunity - instead, many rely on the handouts as a core part of their regular living rather than as what is supposed to be a temporary boost to give them a hand and lift them out of poverty.
Anonymous wrote:For the record, I voted for Fenty and was optimistic about him. I was agnostic about the mayoral takeover of the schools - hated the underhanded way he went about it - got elected in the Democratic primary first and then announced it after he was in effect elected mayor via the primary but later I was convinced it was a good idea. Was also agnostic about Rhee at first until I saw her make my daughter's school worse. And then I watched while she refused to take any responsibility for her mistakes and while her supporters acted as if anyone who criticized her were gleefully supporting failing schools.Anonymous wrote:I am not understanding a big part of this: for all you frustrated parents, railing at the system, hating Fenty, hating Rhee and hating the schools...why are you sending your kids to those schools? What exactly are you setting out to change?
My point is - I didn't start out hating Fenty or Rhee at all. Their massive screw ups and unwillingness to learn from them turned me off. And many of their supporters continue to frame this as a difference of intentions as in Rhee wants accountability and good teaching while people like me cling to mediocrity when the truth of the matter is that it was a matter of inexperience and incompetence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:18, Rhee shook things up. And she made things worse.
That's the issue. Despite virtually unlimited money, unchecked power and rampant cheating, NOTHING has changed in DCPS.
Read the report. It's sobering.
I'm no Rhee apologist, but that is not strictly true. There are procedural administrative changes that have definitely improved. Students do get their books on time, facilities are better maintained, there is PS/PK availability (which is not solely the result of the Mayor). When you say nothing has changed, completely ignoring some objectively positive changes, it damages your credibility.
Anonymous wrote:The poor get plenty of uplift and plenty of opportunity in this city - far more than most other places - but not enough of the poor do their own part and seize opportunity - instead, many rely on the handouts as a core part of their regular living rather than as what is supposed to be a temporary boost to give them a hand and lift them out of poverty.
Anonymous wrote:The poor get plenty of uplift and plenty of opportunity in this city - far more than most other places - but not enough of the poor do their own part and seize opportunity - instead, many rely on the handouts as a core part of their regular living rather than as what is supposed to be a temporary boost to give them a hand and lift them out of poverty.