Anonymous wrote:I sold my home through a traditional agent because I needed help staging and calling in repairs. I needed someone dedicated to selling my home quick. The redfin agent we met for selling seemed disinterested. For selling, traditional agents seem to do more than traditional agents for buying.
So if I were buying, I would use redfin. Selling, use a traditional agent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people get too hung up on the possibility of saving on the commission that they don't see the forest for the trees.
If a really good agent at a traditional firm can get you $25,000 more for your home than a Redfin agent, saving $10,000 on commission doesn't seem as appealing.
I call poopy cock on this.
You're vulgar and disgusting. Do you work for Redfin? Or are you representative of a Redfin client?
Poopy cock? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard that if you work with Redfin, you might see one agent initially, another at the home inspection, and yet another person at the settlement table. I.e., you don't work with one person continuously through the process. I don't know whether or not that's true or whether it once was, or what. But if it's the case, it would be a huge turnoff for me. I wouldn't want my needs handed off from agent to agent like a baton. Too much opportunity for something to fall through the cracks.
Actually it means nothing falls through the cracks. You're no longer dependent on your agent's schedule and it revolves around yours instead.
So, you're saying this is how they do it? You never see the same person twice?
No, thanks.
Anonymous wrote:You must think all Redfin agents are superior, then. By your reasoning, the odds of getting a competent Redfin agent are 1 in 10 as well.
A good agent is a good agent. The brokerage and business model it follows is immaterial, and obsessing over whether you get some commission rebated instead of what price you'll negotiate is like buying a car based on a monthly payment that fits your budget.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming some super agent COULD get an extra $25k (which is rather dubious honestly), but let's roll with it for the sake of argument..
Say the odds of getting a "really good agent" are 1 in 10. That's 10% (odds might be lower in reality, but what the heck, we'll round up). So out of "population" of 10 people, 1 person saves 25,000 with said super agent while 9 people save nothing (or 2500 collectively over 10 people), while with the guaranteed discount each person saves $10k, and the group collectively saves 100k.
For all but the mathematically challenged, the choice should be obvious. Of course, a lot of people play the lottery, so obviously a vast number of people aren't the sharpest of folks. :p
You must think all Redfin agents are superior, then. By your reasoning, the odds of getting a competent Redfin agent are 1 in 10 as well.
A good agent is a good agent. The brokerage and business model it follows is immaterial, and obsessing over whether you get some commission rebated instead of what price you'll negotiate is like buying a car based on a monthly payment that fits your budget.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming some super agent COULD get an extra $25k (which is rather dubious honestly), but let's roll with it for the sake of argument..
Say the odds of getting a "really good agent" are 1 in 10. That's 10% (odds might be lower in reality, but what the heck, we'll round up). So out of "population" of 10 people, 1 person saves 25,000 with said super agent while 9 people save nothing (or 2500 collectively over 10 people), while with the guaranteed discount each person saves $10k, and the group collectively saves 100k.
For all but the mathematically challenged, the choice should be obvious. Of course, a lot of people play the lottery, so obviously a vast number of people aren't the sharpest of folks. :p
You must think all Redfin agents are superior, then. By your reasoning, the odds of getting a competent Redfin agent are 1 in 10 as well.
A good agent is a good agent. The brokerage and business model it follows is immaterial, and obsessing over whether you get some commission rebated instead of what price you'll negotiate is like buying a car based on a monthly payment that fits your budget.

Anonymous wrote:Assuming some super agent COULD get an extra $25k (which is rather dubious honestly), but let's roll with it for the sake of argument..
Say the odds of getting a "really good agent" are 1 in 10. That's 10% (odds might be lower in reality, but what the heck, we'll round up). So out of "population" of 10 people, 1 person saves 25,000 with said super agent while 9 people save nothing (or 2500 collectively over 10 people), while with the guaranteed discount each person saves $10k, and the group collectively saves 100k.
For all but the mathematically challenged, the choice should be obvious. Of course, a lot of people play the lottery, so obviously a vast number of people aren't the sharpest of folks. :p
Anonymous wrote:We sold a Fairfax home to a buyer with Redfin. Absolutely worst experience of our lives - the home inspector left our home with the garage breaker off, detailed problems that didn't exist (ha ha, missed some big problems!) and the Redfin realtor was a cajoling bully that drug out the sale and made it into a nightmare. I would chew off my foot before I bought or sold a home with a Redfin realtor in Northern VA. They think they are the sharpest, but we had to correct the offer to NOT include stuff that wasn't on the listing (Washer & Dryer???), there were lots of 'gotchas' so the buyer was happy with the realtor, it was an unethical nightmare. RUN AWAY FROM REDFIN!!!! Especially in Fairfax County!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people get too hung up on the possibility of saving on the commission that they don't see the forest for the trees.
If a really good agent at a traditional firm can get you $25,000 more for your home than a Redfin agent, saving $10,000 on commission doesn't seem as appealing.
A "really good agent" cannot inflate the market value of your asset.
Anonymous wrote:If a really good agent at a traditional firm can get you $25,000 more for your home than a Redfin agent, saving $10,000 on commission doesn't seem as appealing.

Anonymous wrote:I think people get too hung up on the possibility of saving on the commission that they don't see the forest for the trees.
If a really good agent at a traditional firm can get you $25,000 more for your home than a Redfin agent, saving $10,000 on commission doesn't seem as appealing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people get too hung up on the possibility of saving on the commission that they don't see the forest for the trees.
If a really good agent at a traditional firm can get you $25,000 more for your home than a Redfin agent, saving $10,000 on commission doesn't seem as appealing.
I call poopy cock on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard that if you work with Redfin, you might see one agent initially, another at the home inspection, and yet another person at the settlement table. I.e., you don't work with one person continuously through the process. I don't know whether or not that's true or whether it once was, or what. But if it's the case, it would be a huge turnoff for me. I wouldn't want my needs handed off from agent to agent like a baton. Too much opportunity for something to fall through the cracks.
Actually it means nothing falls through the cracks. You're no longer dependent on your agent's schedule and it revolves around yours instead.
So, you're saying this is how they do it? You never see the same person twice?
No, thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard that if you work with Redfin, you might see one agent initially, another at the home inspection, and yet another person at the settlement table. I.e., you don't work with one person continuously through the process. I don't know whether or not that's true or whether it once was, or what. But if it's the case, it would be a huge turnoff for me. I wouldn't want my needs handed off from agent to agent like a baton. Too much opportunity for something to fall through the cracks.
Actually it means nothing falls through the cracks. You're no longer dependent on your agent's schedule and it revolves around yours instead.
So, you're saying this is how they do it? You never see the same person twice?
No, thanks.