Does one need to talk to his teachers or see his transcripts? Isn't 2 years of his incoherant babbling on TV and town halls enough evidence to draw conclusions?
Not to support the assertion that he was a mediocre student, no.
He was absolutely NOT a mediocre student
Anonymous wrote:Not to support the assertion that he was a mediocre student, no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Awful for a superintendent to casually dismiss any group of students as not being good at something - whether high-achievers, middle of the road or less. Why engage in this at all unless you want to diminish the successful kids?
Because he himself was a mediocre student...and yes ...he is stupid...
Anonymous wrote:Awful for a superintendent to casually dismiss any group of students as not being good at something - whether high-achievers, middle of the road or less. Why engage in this at all unless you want to diminish the successful kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Starr has an agenda. he is against labeling some kids as gifted and therefore providing them with an appropriate education. He sees differentiation as elitist.
Of course he's right in the sense that intelligence alone doesn't guarantee success or even the ability to collaborate effectively. But it's an empty, silly observation to make on Twitter and it tips his hand to his ultimate goal -- teach to the middle because it creates better stnadardized test results.
Dude. It wasn't about your snowflake. Power down the chopper.
+1