Anonymous wrote:Nobody at YY intimidated by native speakers? Right. OP didn't lobby for "preferential treatment" in admissions (that was a different thread or two, last year), she asked about how native speakers are viewed in DC public language immersion programs. You're the one with the one-track mind.
In MoCo, families choose Mandarin immersion programs which include many native speakers to keep standards high and the cultural experience fairly authentic. In DC, Mandarin chooses most parents, people hell bent on staying in the city while avoiding scary IB schools. I'm a classic example - I'd have gone for Hebrew immersion just as easily if it kept me kid out of a truly awful IB school. YY parents love to claim that the Mandarin is what drew them - less than half the truth. Parents don't want precious YY slots going to native speakers, even off the wait list,they just want a spot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, you're wrong.
Posts like this always give me the sense that a lot of folks out there are jealous or have an inferiority complex.
No, she or he is most assuredly not wrong.
Posts like this always give me the sense that a lot of folks out there are in for a tremendous shock if they or their children ever land in a Chinese-speaking swathe of the earth. It's an intense culture, putting it mildly. If anybody's jealous or has an inferiority complex here it's those who are intimidated by native speakers. They're less intimidating when you know them than when you don't.
Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if you aren't set on living in DC, have you considered the MoCo ES Mandarin immersion programs at College Gardens and Potomac? In MoCo, common sense and language immersion admissions policies enjoy a closer relationship than in DC. The two programs do their best to balance native speakers and non-native speakers around 40/60, and provide substantial dialect transition support, with pullout groups for particular speakers. They allow kids who speak Chinese decently to test into upper grades when spots open. And they provide strong support to low-income non-Chinese kids, keeping numbers small enough to afford summer immersion camps for them, so no need for a non-immersion second track like YY's.
These schools would view your family as an asset - no name calling by parents fighting for spots so as to avoid awful IB schools. Overall, the kids speak somewhat better Mandarin than at YY; having many bilngual kids and parents involved pays off. Some complain that native speakers dominate these programs, but somebody's always complaining about somethin'. Visit at any rate, might buck you up.
Anonymous wrote:At a recent Tyler Elementary open house (Capitol Hill), the principal made surprising statements about her Spanish immersion program that were music to my ears. Her remarks made me think of Yu Ying, how that school community's thinking about ethnic input to language immersion seem to be the polar opposite of Tyler's. I say this having persued most of the YY threads, and having attended open houses at the school. Am I wrong? I don't know much about how the leadership of DC's various PS language immersion programs approaches including bilingual children and parents in their school communities, but would be interesting in learning more. Which view is the norm, the Tyler view, the YY view, or something inbetween?
I've heard that Oyster has a separate lottery for Spanish speakers, and that LAMB gives some sort of preferential treatment to them in admissions. We skipped the YY lottery because nobody there seemed to think that having our ethnic Chinese dialect-speaking kid in the school would benefit the program. The opposite, the principal and PA parents were snippy when we asked about bilingual issues. Our Chinese-American immigrant friends who also mainly speak a dialect at home avoid YY, or try it and leave, feeling like token ethnics there. YY's administrators flat out said that, academically, they would treat our dialect-speaking kid like a student who speaks no Chinese. Chinese teachers tell us that there are only one or two bilingual kids per grade.
Here's what the Tyler principal said (drawing from my notes):
*Tyler's language immersion program suffers from having few bilingual Spanish-speaking students and Latino immigrant families involved, a problem we are determined to correct. We wish to celebrate the DC Latino immigrant experience in our program.
*We have started to reach out to the Latino population of nearby neighborhoods to attract more bilingual children to our lottery. And we are working with DCPS to set aside places for such children. We are also moving to identify native Spanish speakers on our wait list and to move them to the top. Our PTA parents support this approach.
*We need more bilingual children in our program to model the language and culture for the other children. We believe that this is an essential component of a successful ES language immersion experience. Our teachers are concerned that our Spanish immersion students speak too much English amongst themselves outside of class, and are too far removed from Latino culture. We want more Spanish-speaking English Language Learners at Tyler. Likewise, our PTA is determined to attract more ethnic Spanish-speaking parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until the Charter School Board changes its policy to allow for native speakers to test-in, the reality is that language immersion schools cannot give preference to native speakers, and given that these are PUBLIC schools -
Haven't we established that these schools are in fact giving preference to to native speakers off WAIT LISTS? At our school, wait list kids fill maybe one-quarter of slots by audit time in Oct. Potentially, that's a big group of native speakers. You want to end wait list shenanigans? Public language immersion schools often give preference to native speakers to advance their missions, includiong here in DC. Ever hear of Oyster Adams?