Anonymous wrote:To the posters that are telling parents to vote with their feet, I think it is obvious that people do. Enrollment is down from two years ago. There were several students who left between 6th and 7th grade. I sincerely hope you are not staff. The loss of 20- 30 full pay students is significant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:7th and 8th science at Norwood is totally lab based. I feel that people post to sabotage Norwood and it really ticks me off. Please ask any Norwood 7th/8th grade student about their experience instead of listening to people who waste our time trying to damage Norwood. Get a life. If you are current parents, find a school that you would prefer for your child and leave Norwood alone.
Amen. Totally agree.
Anonymous wrote:7th and 8th science at Norwood is totally lab based. I feel that people post to sabotage Norwood and it really ticks me off. Please ask any Norwood 7th/8th grade student about their experience instead of listening to people who waste our time trying to damage Norwood. Get a life. If you are current parents, find a school that you would prefer for your child and leave Norwood alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not to hijack, but I have seen many posts about weak teachers in the lower school. Is it really that bad in the lower school?
We are currently an applying family.
Would love more details from OP as to why the teachers are perceived to be weak. Many thanks.
Long story, starts with leadership in the LS. The old head of the MS (US) was great, she left and the new one seems OK. The LS suffers from much change and no one willing to stand up to teachers, some of whom are there to sail into retirement. They really don't want to be asked to do much. They LOVE tutors.
Not a Norwood parent, but at another local private, and this hits a chord. "Lazy" teachers, at any school that is charging the bucks these schools are, should not be tolerated.
The day someone at our school suggests we hire a tutor is the day that I insist that the fee for that be deducted from our tuition bill.
I like you.
I like neither of you.
Anonymous wrote:Re Norwood MS science. It is OK. The kids tend to love the teachers, which makes a big difference - doesn't turn the kids off of science. Is it a rigorous science curriculum? No. (I have science kids and also can compare Norwood w/ a big-3; big 3 was better in science curriculum for a very good science student.) What I think is fabulous about Norwood MS is that the English, and social studies is not bad (certainly not a joke). Math? You will never find a consensus at any school about math teaching, but that is because of screwy expectations and great native differences between students.
Re LS teachers, there is a mix. Parents are very involved, and so sometimes annoyance at an over-involved parent can seem to be "bad teaching." Some of the older teachers (now mainly gone) seemed to me to warm to quirky kids, but most seemed to prefer just being able to teach to the middle and found the outliers to be annoying (hence tutor recommendations as well as - according to other parents in my child's group - too-quick diagnoses by teachers of ADD/ADHD when a child was not compliant enough).
One other point: at Norwood, the school has accommodated students "at the top" when there has been a relatively large group of them (5-10). So for them, they may do great, get some of the best teachers in 7/8, go to great colleges, etc. But it is very very class/cohort dependent. As is bullying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not to hijack, but I have seen many posts about weak teachers in the lower school. Is it really that bad in the lower school?
We are currently an applying family.
Would love more details from OP as to why the teachers are perceived to be weak. Many thanks.
Long story, starts with leadership in the LS. The old head of the MS (US) was great, she left and the new one seems OK. The LS suffers from much change and no one willing to stand up to teachers, some of whom are there to sail into retirement. They really don't want to be asked to do much. They LOVE tutors.
Not a Norwood parent, but at another local private, and this hits a chord. "Lazy" teachers, at any school that is charging the bucks these schools are, should not be tolerated.
The day someone at our school suggests we hire a tutor is the day that I insist that the fee for that be deducted from our tuition bill.
I like you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not to hijack, but I have seen many posts about weak teachers in the lower school. Is it really that bad in the lower school?
We are currently an applying family.
Would love more details from OP as to why the teachers are perceived to be weak. Many thanks.
Long story, starts with leadership in the LS. The old head of the MS (US) was great, she left and the new one seems OK. The LS suffers from much change and no one willing to stand up to teachers, some of whom are there to sail into retirement. They really don't want to be asked to do much. They LOVE tutors.
Not a Norwood parent, but at another local private, and this hits a chord. "Lazy" teachers, at any school that is charging the bucks these schools are, should not be tolerated.
The day someone at our school suggests we hire a tutor is the day that I insist that the fee for that be deducted from our tuition bill.
Anonymous wrote:I would agree with PP.
Our experience has been that social issues, bullying and lots of "mean girl stuff, is routinely diminished or over-looked by the administration. My DD has also mentioned a couple or teachers who either pay particular attention to the popular girls to the exclusion of the rest or some homeroom teachers who befriend the popular boys.
Re LS: We hung on through the lower school just counting the days until our children entered the MS. We had a very mixed bag experience in LS. Second grade was a nightmare and very difficult for our DD. After speaking to other parents, we discovered that one reading teacher told each family in her entire class that their children needed tutoring and psychological intervention. Third grade was a wash. We loved the Fourth Grade team of teachers for both our kids.
For the most part, Norwood teachers are very dedicated and are willing to help their students. We have found the administration to be off-putting. Routinely emails are sent out to the community at largewith mistakes, and we now come to expect that the emails we send to certain members of the administration will unanswered.
We have two years left for our youngest to finish. Was it worth $30K a year? I am not sure, but my kids have been mostly happy