Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking for nurses or OBs who may be on this board to answer a question: if I refuse a urinary catheter during an epidural (assuming I get the epidural around 6-7 cm), what risks am I assuming?
I absolutely refuse urethral catheterization under any circumstances (I also refuse any and all anal/rectal exams and interventions, gynecological exams that aren't essential for my baby's safety, unnecessary exposure of my person, observers, students, and male practitioners.). These are so important to me that several years ago I clearly stated them in notarized advance directives, specifying that I still refuse even if I face certain death as a result and stating that I will prosecute under medical battery statutes if catheterization (or other forbidden procedures) are performed against my will or while I'm unconscious. I am an intelligent, educated woman who knows and accepts the risks associated with my preferences. I have my reasons so please don't judge me or try to change my mind. I need a cesarean for health reasons. Is general anaesthesia a better option than regionall for a cesarea without catheterization? Ha anyone had a cesarean without urinary catheterization? Performed one? I have been told by one OB that they will not do the cesarean without a cath. I am really hoping to find a provider who will agree to honor my choices from the start, but if I can't find one and still continue to refuse the cath, will the hospital perform the emergency cesarean anyway or let me die without one?
Anonymous wrote:OP again. Pushing is pleasant? Isn't it the most painful part (ring of fire?)
Anonymous wrote:I wasn't peeing in the water that I was giving birth in. I peed in the toilet before getting into the water to give birth. Not sure if there have been studies regarding water birth and UTIs, but I didn't get a UTI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have not used an epidural so can't compare, but I've had two babies without medication. I found pushing to be quite satisfying, and less painful than the dilation stage of labor, since I was working with the sensation and pushing with it, rather than letting the pain wash over me, if that makes any sense. The pushing stage with my second baby was very short, and I hardly remember it. I think generally the pushing stages for second and third and subsequent babies are very short. I honestly don't remember the "ring of fire" all that much -- if anything it was encouraging to me because I knew the baby was almost born. I don't recall it lasting very long the first time, and the second time, I gave birth in water, and didn't feel it at all (maybe the water muted it? Not sure...). One of the reasons I wanted to give birth without medication is because I'm prone to UTIs and I know how awful they are, and I wanted to reduce my chance if at all possible. I was able to pee on my own throughout labor, and right after, which was great.
Anonymous wrote:OP again. Pushing is pleasant? Isn't it the most painful part (ring of fire?)
Pushing in water and peeing constantly won't cause UTI? Honest question.
Anonymous wrote:
I absolutely refuse urethral catheterization under any circumstances (I also refuse any and all anal/rectal exams and interventions, gynecological exams that aren't essential for my baby's safety, unnecessary exposure of my person, observers, students, and male practitioners.). These are so important to me that several years ago I clearly stated them in notarized advance directives, specifying that I still refuse even if I face certain death as a result and stating that I will prosecute under medical battery statutes if catheterization (or other forbidden procedures) are performed against my will or while I'm unconscious. I am an intelligent, educated woman who knows and accepts the risks associated with my preferences. I have my reasons so please don't judge me or try to change my mind. I need a cesarean for health reasons. Is general anaesthesia a better option than regionall for a cesarea without catheterization? Ha anyone had a cesarean without urinary catheterization? Performed one? I have been told by one OB that they will not do the cesarean without a cath. I am really hoping to find a provider who will agree to honor my choices from the start, but if I can't find one and still continue to refuse the cath, will the hospital perform the emergency cesarean anyway or let me die without one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking for nurses or OBs who may be on this board to answer a question: if I refuse a urinary catheter during an epidural (assuming I get the epidural around 6-7 cm), what risks am I assuming?
I absolutely refuse urethral catheterization under any circumstances (I also refuse any and all anal/rectal exams and interventions, gynecological exams that aren't essential for my baby's safety, unnecessary exposure of my person, observers, students, and male practitioners.). These are so important to me that several years ago I clearly stated them in notarized advance directives, specifying that I still refuse even if I face certain death as a result and stating that I will prosecute under medical battery statutes if catheterization (or other forbidden procedures) are performed against my will or while I'm unconscious. I am an intelligent, educated woman who knows and accepts the risks associated with my preferences. I have my reasons so please don't judge me or try to change my mind. I need a cesarean for health reasons. Is general anaesthesia a better option than regionall for a cesarea without catheterization? Ha anyone had a cesarean without urinary catheterization? Performed one? I have been told by one OB that they will not do the cesarean without a cath. I am really hoping to find a provider who will agree to honor my choices from the start, but if I can't find one and still continue to refuse the cath, will the hospital perform the emergency cesarean anyway or let me die without one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking for nurses or OBs who may be on this board to answer a question: if I refuse a urinary catheter during an epidural (assuming I get the epidural around 6-7 cm), what risks am I assuming?
I absolutely refuse urethral catheterization under any circumstances (I also refuse any and all anal/rectal exams and interventions, gynecological exams that aren't essential for my baby's safety, unnecessary exposure of my person, observers, students, and male practitioners.). These are so important to me that several years ago I clearly stated them in notarized advance directives, specifying that I still refuse even if I face certain death as a result and stating that I will prosecute under medical battery statutes if catheterization (or other forbidden procedures) are performed against my will or while I'm unconscious. I am an intelligent, educated woman who knows and accepts the risks associated with my preferences. I have my reasons so please don't judge me or try to change my mind. I need a cesarean for health reasons. Is general anaesthesia a better option than regionall for a cesarea without catheterization? Ha anyone had a cesarean without urinary catheterization? Performed one? I have been told by one OB that they will not do the cesarean without a cath. I am really hoping to find a provider who will agree to honor my choices from the start, but if I can't find one and still continue to refuse the cath, will the hospital perform the emergency cesarean anyway or let me die without one?
Anonymous wrote:Looking for nurses or OBs who may be on this board to answer a question: if I refuse a urinary catheter during an epidural (assuming I get the epidural around 6-7 cm), what risks am I assuming?
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Saw midwife today. She suggested I make an appt. with the anesthesiologist at the hospital to see what options he might offer. Does anyone know if there is such a thing as a "light" epidural that would make it more likely I would pee on my own?