Anonymous wrote:OP here - Here is an example that people may understand. SELA will be a Hebrew language charter school. We won't be attending SELA (already at a different charter), but I think its charter is great! There will be hundreds of applicants - many of which REALLY want their children to learn Hebrew. Then there will be applicants who could care absolutely less about the charter of the school, but are looking for free care. So, I don't think it's fair that a family, who doesn't care about the school/charter, takes a spot away from a family who not only loves the idea of their child learning Hebrew, but who would really support the school. That's why I am asking people to not just take a spot if they really don't care about a charter school.
Do I really think there is anything I can do about parents taking (in my opinion) spots away from families who would really care for, nuture and support a school and the school's mission as written in its charter? No, of course not. Can I voice my opinion on DCUM? Yes, of course I can. As another poster wrote, charter schools can only be great if the PARENTS of the school stand behind it and support it to the best of their abilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To ^^ PP, I'm not OP but I think this is directly related to OP's complaint. Part of what is so frustrating re: parents who have crappy attitudes about the charter their kid goes to is that they act like it's an inconvenience that there is a focus they don't agree with. It's not the majority at all of parents, but the few can sometimes really sour things for that class/grade, depending on just how grumpy they are. And, some of these newer charters sink or swim with the energy of parents. Mundo Verde (I'm not an MV parent, just have checked them out a couple of times) who knows where they'd be without parent involvement, much like their birth school (for lack of a better term) EL Haynes.
Parent involvement is key at most charters, and it distinguishes the good ones (or crappy ones) from the great ones.
And I never got the impression that OP thought that somehow she was the "PI Police" (parent involvement police). I didn't see her say anywhere that there is a way to enforce this, I just read her original post as begging and pleading (mostly in vain I think we all agree) with parents to not put their kids in schools where those parents are not going to fully support the mission/charter of that school. And support looks different - charters would be crazy to think every parent will be able to volunteer for hours each week or take on a function in the administration that requires hours (even hours a month is hard for many). But attitude and being willing to do what you can to make it work (at least while your kid is there, even if you're planning to leave) makes all the difference in the world.
That's my read on OP's post, and if I'm wrong, well at least that's my take.
You're wrong!
Unless you're going to identify yourself as OP, who are you to say I'm wrong? (And if you are OP, then clearly many in this thread (not just myself) are missing your original point, so you may want to restate it.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To ^^ PP, I'm not OP but I think this is directly related to OP's complaint. Part of what is so frustrating re: parents who have crappy attitudes about the charter their kid goes to is that they act like it's an inconvenience that there is a focus they don't agree with. It's not the majority at all of parents, but the few can sometimes really sour things for that class/grade, depending on just how grumpy they are. And, some of these newer charters sink or swim with the energy of parents. Mundo Verde (I'm not an MV parent, just have checked them out a couple of times) who knows where they'd be without parent involvement, much like their birth school (for lack of a better term) EL Haynes.
Parent involvement is key at most charters, and it distinguishes the good ones (or crappy ones) from the great ones.
And I never got the impression that OP thought that somehow she was the "PI Police" (parent involvement police). I didn't see her say anywhere that there is a way to enforce this, I just read her original post as begging and pleading (mostly in vain I think we all agree) with parents to not put their kids in schools where those parents are not going to fully support the mission/charter of that school. And support looks different - charters would be crazy to think every parent will be able to volunteer for hours each week or take on a function in the administration that requires hours (even hours a month is hard for many). But attitude and being willing to do what you can to make it work (at least while your kid is there, even if you're planning to leave) makes all the difference in the world.
That's my read on OP's post, and if I'm wrong, well at least that's my take.
You're wrong!
Anonymous wrote:Did I mention that if the cost of daycare was killing us, I can barely imagine what it was doing to lower income and one income working families. I guess those people are more likely to stay at home, get family help, or have to go on the dole.
Anonymous wrote:To ^^ PP, I'm not OP but I think this is directly related to OP's complaint. Part of what is so frustrating re: parents who have crappy attitudes about the charter their kid goes to is that they act like it's an inconvenience that there is a focus they don't agree with. It's not the majority at all of parents, but the few can sometimes really sour things for that class/grade, depending on just how grumpy they are. And, some of these newer charters sink or swim with the energy of parents. Mundo Verde (I'm not an MV parent, just have checked them out a couple of times) who knows where they'd be without parent involvement, much like their birth school (for lack of a better term) EL Haynes.
Parent involvement is key at most charters, and it distinguishes the good ones (or crappy ones) from the great ones.
And I never got the impression that OP thought that somehow she was the "PI Police" (parent involvement police). I didn't see her say anywhere that there is a way to enforce this, I just read her original post as begging and pleading (mostly in vain I think we all agree) with parents to not put their kids in schools where those parents are not going to fully support the mission/charter of that school. And support looks different - charters would be crazy to think every parent will be able to volunteer for hours each week or take on a function in the administration that requires hours (even hours a month is hard for many). But attitude and being willing to do what you can to make it work (at least while your kid is there, even if you're planning to leave) makes all the difference in the world.
That's my read on OP's post, and if I'm wrong, well at least that's my take.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: ^^ Or else, what? You are going to huff and puff on an on line forum? It's a public school friends.
There's no "or else" - the plain fact is, you are going to be ignored and marginalized if you aren't on board with what the charter is about - in which case, you would have been better off trying to find a more suitable option.
Who gives a shit. As long as my child is not ignored and receives an equal education, why would i or anyone else care if a bunch of harpies choose to ignore me, the parent. It's a public school. It cannot discharge students if the parents refuse to volunteer time and money to the school. In other words, it is not private. I know some of you mom and dads want a private school experience for your little darlings at rock bottom public funds dollars, but baby, it ain't happening.
Nobody said anything about "private school experience bla bla bla", you need to get that crap off your shoulders first and foremost. Secondly, you don't seem to understand the difference between a public school and a public charter school. Yes, they are both public, receive public funds, and are open to the public, but Charters can and do indeed specialize - just as many non-Charter public schools around the area do, for example magnets. With Charters, that's the whole point of the CHARTER in the first place, and the CHARTER is what lays that all out. And if you aren't in to what they want to specialize in, then you have DOZENS OF OTHER FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND FREE PUBLIC CHARTERS TO PICK FROM. Would you try and get DC into a science magnet and then say "ugh, why all this science, DC is into music and sports and hates science"? Makes about as little sense as the rest of your commentary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: ^^ Or else, what? You are going to huff and puff on an on line forum? It's a public school friends.
There's no "or else" - the plain fact is, you are going to be ignored and marginalized if you aren't on board with what the charter is about - in which case, you would have been better off trying to find a more suitable option.
Who gives a shit. As long as my child is not ignored and receives an equal education, why would i or anyone else care if a bunch of harpies choose to ignore me, the parent. It's a public school. It cannot discharge students if the parents refuse to volunteer time and money to the school. In other words, it is not private. I know some of you mom and dads want a private school experience for your little darlings at rock bottom public funds dollars, but baby, it ain't happening.