Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I think the 30% thing sucks! As I said, I support retirement for Feds, I just think it's not right that people then go on to a lucrative second career trading on their Federal contacts.
I would support a system where your Federal retirement decreases commensurate with outside earned income at a certain point.
I don't want my taxes going to retirement for lobbyists. But if someone wants to retire from a Fed job and be a teacher or something like that, I would 100% support it.
100% agree with this. And no, I have no jealousy, I just think that the scenario OP describes is absolutely not what was envisioned when the pension system was designed. I think what OP suggests is fiscally and ethically responsible.
+1000
Once I met a woman, who told me that she was retired from Fed government years ago in her late 40s (she was 52) and was now considering what her 3rd luxury car should be. BTW, she only had a high school diploma and no other qualifications.
Feds do get perks and excitement too. Remember the meetings in vegas? Many are paid to attend conferences of their choosing usually in great locations and I know because I work for the Fed govt and have these travel perks. I have been to confeences in Hawaii, vegas, the Carribean and each location and meeting was my choice as long as it is career development.
OP is absolutely right. No wonder the budget is in the red and USA is borrowing money from China. Partly to pay pensions to relatively yiung "retirees" who use the govt contatcs in a second career with high salary. Better start learning Chinese.
OMG you met a federal worker who drives a luxury car? The NERVE of her! These bastard feds, sucking at the teat of the government, wasting precious hours of taxpayer-funded time on DCUM... Wait a second. You are one of them? Why don't you do all of us a favor and quit? Something about your post screams sock puppet troll.
Anonymous wrote:My neighbor is collecting 100% FED salary as pension, as well as spouse's.
I hate to think that our children will be paying for a long time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1000
Once I met a woman, who told me that she was retired from Fed government years ago in her late 40s (she was 52) and was now considering what her 3rd luxury car should be. BTW, she only had a high school diploma and no other qualifications.
Feds do get perks and excitement too. Remember the meetings in vegas? Many are paid to attend conferences of their choosing usually in great locations and I know because I work for the Fed govt and have these travel perks. I have been to confeences in Hawaii, vegas, the Carribean and each location and meeting was my choice as long as it is career development.
OP is absolutely right. No wonder the budget is in the red and USA is borrowing money from China. Partly to pay pensions to relatively yiung "retirees" who use the govt contatcs in a second career with high salary. Better start learning Chinese.
Don't believe you. Either you are lying or she is lying. Under the old federal retirement system, you had to meet the rule of 85. Even if you met the 85 rule, full retirement was age 55 and early retirement with penalty was 52.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know because she told me. Late fifties.
I am a fed-42 years old and that is my same salary too. I've been with the govt since I was 25. If it makes you feel better I won't retire until at least 67.
Btw, FEDS my age do not have the pension like my 71 year old father. We have "thrift savings plan' which is basically a 401K. It is like private sector and NOTHING like Fed retirement of our elders...which is why I will be working until 67..
Military retire aft 20 and the officers have a great retirement and then go into private sector as you describe.[/quote
+1
ATTENTION ALL ASSHOLES: the fed pension program was phased out long ago.
Those of us 45 and younger do not have a pension. We have a 401k like the private sector.
Anonymous wrote:I'm really angry about these football and baseball players who get paid 10 million dollars for their athletic prowess.
Whew! I feel so much better now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of knowledge of the day-to-day work of a federal worker is pretty obvious, here. The fed-bashing of the jealous are, sadly, not surprising.
I work hard at my job and at all hours (often through lunch at in the evenings; over the holidays). The 9-5 gig is no longer present in any fed job I've had. I get no overtime. None.
I've put in my years (almost 15) when others couldn't be bothered with the salary I drew (now those big firm lawyers are trying to come to the fed side in droves - I know, I've interviewed them). So, yeah, when I receive my retirement (FERS, not the more generous CSRS) I'm going to take it gleefully. And, if I can use my contacts for something else, you best believe I will do it and without apology.
You can call me whatever you want. I made a smart choice. And am not apologizing for it.
PP, salaried employees outside the government don't typically get overtime either.
Anonymous wrote:The lack of knowledge of the day-to-day work of a federal worker is pretty obvious, here. The fed-bashing of the jealous are, sadly, not surprising.
I work hard at my job and at all hours (often through lunch at in the evenings; over the holidays). The 9-5 gig is no longer present in any fed job I've had. I get no overtime. None.
I've put in my years (almost 15) when others couldn't be bothered with the salary I drew (now those big firm lawyers are trying to come to the fed side in droves - I know, I've interviewed them). So, yeah, when I receive my retirement (FERS, not the more generous CSRS) I'm going to take it gleefully. And, if I can use my contacts for something else, you best believe I will do it and without apology.
You can call me whatever you want. I made a smart choice. And am not apologizing for it.
Anonymous wrote:I'm irritated by the fact that my neighbor made over $150K at her Fed job, retired, and now collects 80% of that while pulling in several hundred thousand more as a lobbyist.
I fully support retirement for federal employees but I think this double dipping is unconscionable, particularly as she's drawing on her contacts for profit.
Whew, I feel better!