Anonymous wrote:I asked this upthread but nobody responded...I really am curious why people think it is easier to buckle a child in that faces the front! We made the switch recently for our just turned three year old and is a MUCH bigger pain now. Previously, I just sat in the seat next to her and could face her while buckling. Now I have to contort around to get her buckled in. Why do people think it is easier? What am I missing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
You have a five-year-old child facing backwards?!?!?! How does he/she go on playdates in other people's cars?
I've got three children in different schools and I've never, ever heard of or seen a five-year-old facing backwards. That is definitely unusual. Most five-year-olds in NW DC are in booster seats.
This child would not be on the growth chart or would hit in the less than 3% down to negative percentages for his age. He sounds like he is the size of an very tiny 3 year old or an average 2 year old.
Mom, unless your child is not abnormally small to the point that the peds are frantically sending you to nutritionists and growth specialists, you need to reweigh and remeasure your son to make sure you have accurate growth statistics for him. It sounds like you might be putting him at great risk by having him in a carseat way to small for him, and rear facing him to the point that it is dangerous because he is well beyond the seat limitations.
I believe PP's numbers have a typo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does your child see the lights if they are rear facing? Ifthey are looking out the back of the car how are they seeing what is ahead of them?
they see the lights BEHIND the car, duh... the lights on the other side of the street. is it really that hard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
Loser mom.
With the live child.
While the "cool mom" will have a dead one. Who wins?
Doubtful. Alarmist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
Loser mom.
With the live child.
While the "cool mom" will have a dead one. Who wins?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
Loser mom.
Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
You have a five-year-old child facing backwards?!?!?! How does he/she go on playdates in other people's cars?
I've got three children in different schools and I've never, ever heard of or seen a five-year-old facing backwards. That is definitely unusual. Most five-year-olds in NW DC are in booster seats.
This child would not be on the growth chart or would hit in the less than 3% down to negative percentages for his age. He sounds like he is the size of an very tiny 3 year old or an average 2 year old.
Mom, unless your child is not abnormally small to the point that the peds are frantically sending you to nutritionists and growth specialists, you need to reweigh and remeasure your son to make sure you have accurate growth statistics for him. It sounds like you might be putting him at great risk by having him in a carseat way to small for him, and rear facing him to the point that it is dangerous because he is well beyond the seat limitations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehhhh...my 5 year old who is 36inches and 30lbs who is still rearfacing...
I don't really care if its popular. You can't fix dead and my son is way safer rearfacing.
You have a five-year-old child facing backwards?!?!?! How does he/she go on playdates in other people's cars?
I've got three children in different schools and I've never, ever heard of or seen a five-year-old facing backwards. That is definitely unusual. Most five-year-olds in NW DC are in booster seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
doesn't look uncomfortable to me.
besides, they don't know how it feels ridding any other way so it's not an issue, really.
That looks horribly uncomfortable. Her legs are all squished up. And it looks like she is rolling herself in a ball to fit. I'm not saying the kid minds, but to me it just looks uncomfortable.
That isn't uncomfortable. Kids are far more flexible than adults. She clearly posing for the picture. For you, sure it is probably uncomfortable, but its not for them. If you are concerned about leg room and want to rf, if you can afford it, you import a swedish seat and those give more leg room as they are designed differently.
My child RF is 3 out of 4 cars. Its impossible in the 4th car and they FF but are rarely in that car. Its not an issue at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
doesn't look uncomfortable to me.
besides, they don't know how it feels ridding any other way so it's not an issue, really.
That looks horribly uncomfortable. Her legs are all squished up. And it looks like she is rolling herself in a ball to fit. I'm not saying the kid minds, but to me it just looks uncomfortable.