Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are people so very sure Casey killed Caylee? Just curious, since obviously the evidence wasn't overwhelming enough for her to be convicted.

I know she's sketchy and a pathological liar, but capable of pulling off the perfect crime on her own? Unlikely.

It wasn't a perfect crime. It was, in fact, very sloppy. There was absolutely enough evidence to convict her. The jury was full of morons who think the world operates like an episode of CSI. They didn't ask to review even ONE piece of evidence once they went into deliberations. In a 5 week trial! A few went in thinking she was guilty and in less than 13 hours of deliberations, without reviewing any of the evidence, let the others convince them to vote not guilty. There is no other reasonable explanation in this world than that Casey did it. Now, I don't think she meant to. I think it was an accident. And then I think she tried to cover it up. But she DID do it.

the prosecution was sloppy. Remember the computer searches? That evidence was false.
I seriously doubt the validity of the legal system for the police to even make a mistake like that

The police didn't. The company who created the program and ran the program later admitted, after testimony, that they had found a glitch in the program that showed chloroform had only been searched once, not the multiple times their program had indicated. The police had nothing to do with that and the company did not catch the error until trial was underway and their expert had testified on the original report. Prosecutions issue was they could not give a specific cause of death due to Caylees deteriorated remains. They proved the body had been placed there in the swamp, and most likely by Casey, but could not prove how she died. Casey simply lucked out that Caylees body was found too late to be able to determine cause of death from her remains.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are people so very sure Casey killed Caylee? Just curious, since obviously the evidence wasn't overwhelming enough for her to be convicted.

I know she's sketchy and a pathological liar, but capable of pulling off the perfect crime on her own? Unlikely.

It wasn't a perfect crime. It was, in fact, very sloppy. There was absolutely enough evidence to convict her. The jury was full of morons who think the world operates like an episode of CSI. They didn't ask to review even ONE piece of evidence once they went into deliberations. In a 5 week trial! A few went in thinking she was guilty and in less than 13 hours of deliberations, without reviewing any of the evidence, let the others convince them to vote not guilty. There is no other reasonable explanation in this world than that Casey did it. Now, I don't think she meant to. I think it was an accident. And then I think she tried to cover it up. But she DID do it.

the prosecution was sloppy. Remember the computer searches? That evidence was false.
I seriously doubt the validity of the legal system for the police to even make a mistake like that

Anonymous wrote:Patsy Ramsey totally killed her daughter. Did anyone hear that interview on Howard Stern recently with the profiler? He worked on the Ramsey case and couldn't give details how he is certain (and he said the people involved at the level he was all agreed, but couldn't prove it) he says she did it. He said it was motivated by her obsession with controlling her and as she started getting older Patsy started losing control over her.

I am friends with a former FBI special agent. He also says Patsy but refuses to elaborate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened to Ray Gricar, the Centre County, PA prosecutor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Gricar

There was a young federal prosecutor from MD US attorney if memory serves who was killed under mysterious circumstance. Am I confusing him with this person? Anyone recall what i am talking about? His body was found in a river. It was right before or during a trial?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Luna

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened to Ray Gricar, the Centre County, PA prosecutor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Gricar

There was a young federal prosecutor from MD US attorney if memory serves who was killed under mysterious circumstance. Am I confusing him with this person? Anyone recall what i am talking about? His body was found in a river. It was right before or during a trial?

I remember that case. Wasn't he stabbed to death by a small object like a pen?

Anonymous wrote:What happened to Ray Gricar, the Centre County, PA prosecutor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Gricar

There was a young federal prosecutor from MD US attorney if memory serves who was killed under mysterious circumstance. Am I confusing him with this person? Anyone recall what i am talking about? His body was found in a river. It was right before or during a trial?

What happened to Ray Gricar, the Centre County, PA prosecutor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Gricar

Patsy Ramsey totally killed her daughter. Did anyone hear that interview on Howard Stern recently with the profiler? He worked on the Ramsey case and couldn't give details how he is certain (and he said the people involved at the level he was all agreed, but couldn't prove it) he says she did it. He said it was motivated by her obsession with controlling her and as she started getting older Patsy started losing control over her.

Anonymous wrote:I think Casey killed Caylee by accident. And those are the best crimes to get away with, the ones that just happen without any planning or evidence to show you were planning to do anything crazy like that.

this I could believe more than she just outright offed the kid. I still am not sure which evidence points directly at Casey that is ironclad and irrefutable, however.

Are there any lawyers who actually followed the trial who would like to chime in on this?

Did Richard III kill his nephews, or was it Henry Tudor? Or even someone else?

Anonymous wrote:How are people so very sure Casey killed Caylee? Just curious, since obviously the evidence wasn't overwhelming enough for her to be convicted.

I know she's sketchy and a pathological liar, but capable of pulling off the perfect crime on her own? Unlikely.

It wasn't a perfect crime. It was, in fact, very sloppy. There was absolutely enough evidence to convict her. The jury was full of morons who think the world operates like an episode of CSI. They didn't ask to review even ONE piece of evidence once they went into deliberations. In a 5 week trial! A few went in thinking she was guilty and in less than 13 hours of deliberations, without reviewing any of the evidence, let the others convince them to vote not guilty. There is no other reasonable explanation in this world than that Casey did it. Now, I don't think she meant to. I think it was an accident. And then I think she tried to cover it up. But she DID do it.

I think Casey killed Caylee by accident. And those are the best crimes to get away with, the ones that just happen without any planning or evidence to show you were planning to do anything crazy like that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened to Dail Dinwiddie? I was at the U2 concert where she was last seen.
http://www.thestate.com/2012/08/13/2398885/dail-dinwiddie-what-missing-woman.html

I remember this!

I was going to post this one too. I went to college with her.

How are people so very sure Casey killed Caylee? Just curious, since obviously the evidence wasn't overwhelming enough for her to be convicted.

I know she's sketchy and a pathological liar, but capable of pulling off the perfect crime on her own? Unlikely.

What happened to the Lyon sisters. I grew up here and remember this so well. So sad.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyon_sisters