Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Obviously, it's better if every school in every neighborhood is a good school.
Bingo, but five years of reform in DCPS has failed to do this because 1) they pursued the misguided belief that threatening principals and teachers was the route to better schools 2) They've sold their souls (to keep their jobs) by supporting the charter movement. There's no indication that charters are better overall than traditional public schools, but yet we have more and more charters - and more and more kids (whose parents can afford it) traveling across town and parents moving to the burbs when they strike out in the lottery.
There is, though. Once again the DC-CAS results prove that charters are out-performing district schools.
By a few points, that waver year to year. It's more accurate and meaningful to say that ward 2-3 DCPS schools are out-performing wards 7-8 DCPS schools.
I was speaking from a national perspective. Most charters are worse the traditional public schools, from a score perspective. A few are better and a few are the same.
Anonymous wrote:Some of the parents who see charters off the Hill as the answer to their ms prayers are in for disappointment, not right away, but by hs. We left Latin after facing the reality that our bright and disciplined kid was falling behind peers in suburban schools and at privates, particularly in math, writing and Spanish.