Anonymous wrote:A couple of years ago, my kid was wait-listed for Eastern; we were encouraged by our school's principal and the magnet coordinator to "appeal" the wait-list decision but supplementing your profile. (Although the notification letter says that the selection committee will review the files of all applicants in the wait-pool in filling open seats, both the principal and magnet coordinator said that it is important to supplement the file with additional information -- otherwise, the second committee is simply reviewing the same material as the initial one and the second committee is unlikely to "disagree" with the initial placement when presented with the same information; in other words, we were strongly advised to give them "something else" to consider.)
My kid was moved from the wait-list and invited into the program within a couple of weeks from the deadline for filing an appeal (which was the same deadline for invited and waitlisted students to accept/decline the placement). A friend's kid who also was wait-listed (and who also filed an appeal/supplemented the application) was offered a seat into the program just after the school year started, and transfered to Eastern from the local middle school in early-mid September and didn't have any problems getting up to speed. And, there were also a couple of kid's who joined the program in seventh grade but, in one of those cases, the student was not invited from the wait-pool, but was placed at Eastern when she moved to MoCo from a similar magnet program/school in a different state -- and she seems to have done well too despite "missing" the first year of the program.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of discussion about whether or not to appeal but does anyone know anything about odds of getting out of the "waitpool"? The letter says students from the waitpool will be selected by lottery. So is that an ongoing lottery as admitted kids decline spots? How long do the accepted students have to decide? Any information appreciated.
Anonymous wrote:The amount of applicants and academic level of applicants are different in each consortium. So, selecting criterion for HGC students has to be different based on which consortia they live.
Here is median SAS of selected students for Pin Crest/Oak View center that I got from the letter of MCPS
Verbal: 130
Quantitative: 122
Nonverbal: 126
I hope other parents can post their median SAS score of selected students from the other consortium.
-- and, in our case, we are fortunate because our home school is sufficient (e.g., Math 7 in Grade 5 -- and thrilled that we're avoiding the whole Curriculum 2.0 implementation!).
Anonymous wrote: my underlying point was that the reality is that there are many more qualified students -- even exceptionally qualified students -- than there is space in the magnet programs.
So when my all Os & As, above grade level performing at a well-regarded MCPS ES (which consistently has 4-6 students each year move into the HGC), highly-recommended, and above median-test scoring student was not accepted into the program, I didn't think that some less-deserving student "got" my kid's spot. Instead, as I explained to my kid going into the process, in this county (and from our school with a majority of the Grade 3 students applying), it's pretty much a crap shoot gaining admission into the magnet program
-- and, in our case, we are fortunate because our home school is sufficient (e.g., Math 7 in Grade 5 -- and thrilled that we're avoiding the whole Curriculum 2.0 implementation!).
Anonymous wrote:I'm the pp from 8 a.m. I think I was partly responding to this post which I disagree with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Test results drive most of the decision for acceptance/rejection.
Grades are somewhat subjective too - some teachers are easier graders than others.
Test results do not drive most of the decisions - I am told by AEI who handles selection process. In fact AEI has told many times that racial, gender equilibrium is one thing they look for. They would not put it in writing in the criteria - but they talk about it in information session. I have no idea how they achieve balance. AEI will not disclose clear cutoff points and they have said they take teachers recommendation into account. AEI will not also disclose the weights they assign to different factors (test result, grades, raven testing score from 2nd grade, MAP-R, teacher recommendation etc.). Hence the overall selection process is quite subjective and done on a case-to-case basis.
Forgot to add, I also have learned that the academic levels of students selected to each HGC vary beacuse of this subjective selection process.