Anonymous wrote:the saddest part of if all is that there are a bunch of presidential candidates currently running for office that would encourage THIS type of laws to pass nation-wide.
I feel sorry for all the women in VA that have to subject themselves to these type of XVII century legislation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.ppaction.org/site/Calendar?id=101974&view=Detail
There is a day of action on this and related issues on Thursday all day. The above link is for Northern VA area.
Below if for general info about the day.
http://www.naralva.org/events/lobby-day.shtml
I though planned parent hood wasn't primarily about abortion, didn't all of you libs decry that when they took funding away?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure why it hasn't gotten more press. They terminated at around 19 weeks because there was an infection with the fetus that threatened the life of the mother. So they induced labor and delivered, which resulted in a still birth (or death shortly after). I suppose he justifies this to himself that because this was an indirection action it doesn't "count" as a termination. But as someone who terminated at 14 weeks (via D&C) due to a chromosome abnormality, I see no difference in what I did and what they did. The intent and the outcome were the same.
As I understood it, she developed an infection in her uterus and was given a large dose of antibiotics. Doctors urged her to induce, but she went into labor before having to make that choice. I absolutely loathe Santorum and I find if difficult to believe that two people who have gone through such heartbreaking experiences would think that that they know what the right choices should be for everyone else, however, I think it's inaccurate to say that she terminated a pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:another thing. Pregnant women will not be able to travel outside the country unless they have a passport for the fetus, just as now we cannot take an infant with us unless the infant has a passport. So, how will we issue passports to embryos and fetuses? We won't know their sex so can't give them a name. And what about the use of date of birth on official documents? We would have to use date of conception, but how do we know that for certain?
and this only scratches the surface of the consequences.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.ppaction.org/site/Calendar?id=101974&view=Detail
There is a day of action on this and related issues on Thursday all day. The above link is for Northern VA area.
Below if for general info about the day.
http://www.naralva.org/events/lobby-day.shtml
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, if we think logically about the consequences...since nearly half of fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted, most before the woman knows she is pregnant, then every menstrual flow will have to be collected and analyzed to see if it contains a "person." And if it does, then there will have to be a coroner's investigation, a determination of whether the woman did anything that contributed to the expulsion of the fertilized egg, etc. Would it help if we broadcast this scenario?
Good point.
Morons.
You are the moron for not being able to foresee the potential complications of this amendment. But, then again, since you probably believe that what is best for you is best for everyone, you likely see no problem with that.
I am so sick of these freaking people I could vomit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, if we think logically about the consequences...since nearly half of fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted, most before the woman knows she is pregnant, then every menstrual flow will have to be collected and analyzed to see if it contains a "person." And if it does, then there will have to be a coroner's investigation, a determination of whether the woman did anything that contributed to the expulsion of the fertilized egg, etc. Would it help if we broadcast this scenario?
Good point.
Morons.