Anonymous wrote:No, that wasn't at all what I meant to say, but thanks anyway.
another poster from a poor family with a lot of kids. Why is that?
Pardon my ignorance, but did your mother not have time to teach you to cook? How could she expect you to be responsible for feeding your younger siblings without instruction?
Anonymous wrote:Some of the posters here are really clueless. When you are struggling to provide 3 meals a day for your children, buying organic is NOT a priority. When we went through difficult times during my childhood, my mom was not looking to buy $10 Rao's sauce and high end pasta. Luckily, she was an amazing cook so we did not eat many processed goods but she scoured the sales and certainly could not afford some of the specialty items we eat today.
Many people here seem unaware of the dynamics of a poor family. Often there are single family households and no money for child care so the older siblings care for the younger ones. When my mother worked late, I often had to prepare dinner for my younger siblings. I certainly had no clue how to turn beans into a meal when I was 10 years old. So, yes I think canned goods in general are easier to prepare for children responsible for dinner. With that being said, I do think there are better options than Spaghettios that are still relatively inexpensive.
Anonymous wrote:People you need to get a clue. Step out of your lily white tower and get your head out of your butt.
I grew up poor. Really poor. Working class poor. Latch key kid whose older sister did the cooking.
Beans? You have to be kidding. That bag of beans isn't going to do anything for the poor unless you are donating the spices and veggies necessary to turn those beans into a meal. Have you checked out the price of spice lately? The poor aren't wasting their money on spices.
Do you know how many times a fire was started on the stove because my sister was trying to cook something and got distracted with her homework or her siblings?
Preparing something that had to be soaked overnight and simmered for hours? Get real Not when one kid is taking care of another as is often the case in a poor household.
Fast, cheap and easy is the way to go. Quite frankly, when you are truly poor, quantity beats quality every day.
BTW, in my family, we would have been happier for all 4 kids to have a coat than for one of us to have a "high end" coat. In my neighborhood, we preferred Target over Lily Pulitzer any day. The LP screams charity and wearing such a thing would have ensured that we got the crap beaten out of us, anyway.
Are you really than dense or are you just misguided? Good grief.
Thank you to those of you who donate with a generous heart. Those of you who judge the "quality" of what someone else is donating and judge it to be insufficient have my pity.
Anonymous wrote:
When you are donating all of those wonderful and healthy beans, are you donating all of the spices, vegetables and broth necessary to turn those beans into a meal? How many of you want to sit down to a meal of boiled beans? How many or your kids would eat a big old bowl of beans with no added flavor?
Yeah, better to donate absolutely nothing then.
Anonymous wrote:When you are donating all of those wonderful and healthy beans, are you donating all of the spices, vegetables and broth necessary to turn those beans into a meal? How many of you want to sit down to a meal of boiled beans? How many or your kids would eat a big old bowl of beans with no added flavor?
I go through my son's clothes and throw away the really stained ones. If i wouldn't let him go out in it, I don't donate it
You do know that places like Goodwill sell these damaged items to recyclers were the fibers are turned into other goods and the charity receives money. I guess you would rather clog up a landfill as a "matter of respect."
Anonymous wrote:I go through my son's clothes and throw away the really stained ones. If i wouldn't let him go out in it, I don't donate it
You do know that places like Goodwill sell these damaged items to recyclers were the fibers are turned into other goods and the charity receives money. I guess you would rather clog up a landfill as a "matter of respect."
I could argue that we could stand to spend less on electronic gizmos and more on better quality food.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I donated several bags of beans to the Boy Scouts food drive that was just this Saturday. I'll buy store-brand cereal for donations.
Organic food > bulk food (bags of rice, beans, etc.) > mass-produced food > starvation.
The pressure is on mass-produced food, steadily it has gotten better. As more people buy organic food, economics of scale kick in.
Let's face it these various carcinogens in modern mass-produced food are only known because we're not kicking it at 45 due to diptheria or cholera.
This has to be one of the most idiotic posts I have read. There is not an increase of carcinogens in bulk food compared to organic , and carcinogens don't cause cholera or diptheria.