Anonymous wrote:So... High IQ + High Interest in education.
No wonder so many Asians in AAP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or maybe Asian students have higher average IQ.
The sources say Korea as a country has the highest average IQ.
There are high Korean population in the Fairfax area.
China is very high, too, and many Chinese population here.
Also, many Indians came from India to this area are relatiely upper class in India.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality
http://sq.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm
i bet they prep the IQ tests there too!
Anonymous wrote:Or maybe Asian students have higher average IQ.
The sources say Korea as a country has the highest average IQ.
There are high Korean population in the Fairfax area.
China is very high, too, and many Chinese population here.
Also, many Indians came from India to this area are relatiely upper class in India.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality
http://sq.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm
Anonymous wrote:15:17 -- The thing is that, to some degree, there is a correlation between intelligence and income. In addition, there is a genetic component to intelligence. Therefore, there should be a relationship between intelligence of the kids and income of the parents.
I suspect if we look at AAP, you would see a very strong correlation between AAP and family income.
Whether it is from prep, smarter kids, more emphasis on education is not known.
With that said, I believe we have a moral imperative to identify the smart/gifted children in economically disadvantaged situations.
Anonymous wrote:There is no reason to believe children who score lower on entrance tests will do equally in the classroom. If, as prior posters noted, certain children score higher because of involved parents and respect for the educational process, wouldn't this also translate into better performance in the classroom due to parents expecting and nurturing academic excellence. The changes have to first occur in the homes of the underrepresented students. Coming to the end of the process and admitting students who have not earned their place does a disservice to everyone.
The concern is that the test is being "gamed." Practicing test questions over and over enables someone to do well on a test, but someone who does well on the test because of reading widely and being curious about many subjects is probably a better student. It is possible for a student without real aptitude to to learn how to take the test by taking practice tests over and over. They can get used to the questions and how they are asked and do well even if they haven't really learned the subject matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course there are no guarantees! But, their success in life will primarily be a result of parenting. What school they go is highly unlikely to make any difference - especially when there are sufficient educational opportunities at every single school in FCPS. Do you REALLY think that if your child doesn't get into the school of YOUR choice the child doomed to mediocrity? Do you really think the school makes that much of a difference? It doesn't.
Sorry, success in life is function of many variables - the family they born in (wealth and gene), parenting, education, luck, etc...