This thread is hysterical. OP asks a relatively educated & interesting question ("To what extent do the local elite private schools encourage their students to think for themselves & act independently?") and out come the most bizarre collection of responses. Like what, 2 people, have engaged in a substantive conversation on what should be an interesting topic to all of us?
So far, you all have accused OP of being a bad writer, a bad mother, not knowing her own child, caring more about a brand than a kid, pushing her kid harder than she should, being a jerk to people on DCUM, and hating the autistic. Because she asked whether you though your DC's schools encouraged them to think independently! OP, carry on. At least a few of us think you're the normal one.
I encourage you to look at schools outside Washington. The boarding schools are at a Secondary Schools Conference at Norwood next week. Might be worth investigating.
I had a similar reaction. PP used awfully strong language without knowing anything about that child's situation. Perhaps he was coming down with something. Perhaps he was injured. Perhaps he has an ASD. Perhaps he was just having a bad day and is usually quite self-sufficient. This is a 9 year-old, after all. When you things like "OMG What the FUCK is wrong with a kid like that," it makes me sad.
I had a similar reaction. PP used awfully strong language without knowing anything about that child's situation. Perhaps he was coming down with something. Perhaps he was injured. Perhaps he has an ASD. Perhaps he was just having a bad day and is usually quite self-sufficient. This is a 9 year-old, after all. When you things like "OMG What the FUCK is wrong with a kid like that," it makes me sad.
Anonymous wrote:
What you share is VERY interesting. May I ask : where does DH teach ? Myself I think I notice a HUGE change in the kids today too. I think I notice it more than others because I waited until late 30's to have a child. This means that my 60's and 70's era childhood is very different than my DC's. Not having freedom to roam as kids, I suspect is a big contributor to immaturity later. Doubly so, if you have a boy. I saw this played out in stark relief yesterday at a rainy Stoddard soccer game : A 9 year old boy was screaming at his mother "get me out of here,Mom". I guess he was cold, but seriously !!! "get me out of here" What is she a chauffer, a fixer. Put on a damn coat, run around, get back on the field anything....but OMG What the F**K is wrong with a kid like that.
Anonymous wrote:23:22 here again
As you look for HS - you should be looking for a good match for your child. And you can teach your child through this process that it is the match that matters, not just the brand name of the school. One of the great benefits of moving from a k-8 school is your child can learn how to find a match so that they already are familiar with that idea when it comes time to apply for college. Your actions now will be a blueprint for your child later...so if you act like you care about Big 3 over Big 5 for external reasons for HS - they may do the same for college.
That's precisely why I teach my children a tried and true trusted brand is equally important -- even in education! A cost - benefit (reward) analysis goes with good economic sense. Children should be taught this early in life.
Furthermore, that's precisely why we are still driving our 15 year old Toyota and our Ford was junked long ago due to abject and poor quality. Are you suggesting I should have bought a Ford?
You say these things because you aren't very well-educated yourself and because you don't see any intrinsic value in education.
Anonymous wrote:I dunno -- "after 14 years of high-powered private schooling, did your kids turn out to be thoughtful and intellectually engaged people or exceptionally well-trained performing seals (and do you credit or blame the school or yourselves for this outcome)?" strikes me as a question someone might wonder about. And, for that matter, a question than many potential respondents might well take offense at. Mystery solved.
10 years into the process, DC seems firmly on the former path and I think that's because school and home reinforced each others' values. At least that's what I take away when I look at DC's schoolmates, some of whom are like DC, but most of whom aren't. Where I think school makes the most difference is when you have a kid whose personality or interests start(s) out different from his or her parents and who ends up at a school that's a good fit for the kid.
I'm not sure to whom you are writing and what point you are making. As far as brand is concerned in the mid-1990s when I bought my car a FORD was a FORD and a TOYOTA was TOYOTA. I got a lousy return on my investment with the FORD. I got an excellent ROI with the TOYOTA. Education is no different.
Why would I spend $30,000/ year for an private primary school education in the D.C. area. This is a lousy ROI in my opinion. The public magnet schools are a far superior eduactional brand. Therefore, my children went to the public school magnets for primary education. There received a far superior return on that investment. "High-powered private primary school" does not equal superior education in the D.C. area. For those struggling with their underwater mortgages we have no reason to be part of the educational bubble and sentence our children to worthess underwater educational loans. Therefore, the choice of $45,000/year at Harvard may indeed be a better ROI thatn $35.000/year at Podunk University.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most kids that age are not intellectually mature. They care about what people think of them because they are still pretty self-centered. Their parents might add to this by vocalizing how important "status" is by material possessions. I've heard parents say many things in front of their kids like "Don't wear that. You look like a homeless person." or "That school is full of weirdos." Etc. Kids internalize this after many years of it.
I disagree and 19 years old is not a "kid". I am not talking about HS freshman. I am talking about HS seniors. Was is Piaget or Erikkson who said that,"identity is the developmental task of the teenager" Seems you need that to choose a college and a major. It is not the sum of a transcript plus extracurriculars.
Perhaps you will find some mature girls at that age but most boys do not fully mature until their mid 20s. I have my Master's degree, thanks. In education. My DH teaches some college courses and he concurs. There are fewer boys in his freshman classes (writing) because 1) there are fewer boys enrolled in the college and this has been the case for 10+ years and 2) boys are overrepresented in the remedial courses. They graduate from HS and if they enroll in college, they are not ready for the college level classes so they have to take remedial ones first. In our society, 19 is still a "kid." Parents hover over their children and that is why parents are overly involved in the college admission's process. My DH gets emails every year from parents of his students. He, of course, cannot discuss their grades, etc with their parents but that doesn't stop them. The students he has are immature compared to the ones he had years ago. They text in class (without trying to hide it) and are generally not as respectful to the teacher, according to my DH. Times have changed and not necessarily for the better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I went to a Big 3 school and in many ways I was immature when I graduated (at 17, not 19). I chose the colleges I applied to based on proximity to skiing. But you know what? It all worked out very well in the end. I think the education I got in HS prepared me well for college and graduate school. I think 17 and 18 year olds are generally going to be immature in at least some ways whether they are at a big 3 school, big 10 school, great public school, crappy public school, whatever. In fact college bound kids at crappy public schools are probably the most mature because they have to be self motivated and independent and are much less likley to be helicoptered through life. So maybe that's where you need to be focusing your energy.
Our teenage DC so far are looking for: Division 1 sports, preferably ACC football (as a spectator, not player); great skiing at outdoor activities (thinking UColorado at Boulder); great city and shopping (thinking NYU or Georgetown); warm weather, good football (thinking a Florida state school); medical college on campus (thinking Florida, Pittsburgh or VCU). They all rank decent dining hall as important. That's what's important to them; what's important to you?
Would you mind sharing where you went to school and where your DC is currently a student. Again, not to generalize, but just trying to get a sense apart from what the AD's and the brochures tell you about a school. thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I went to a Big 3 school and in many ways I was immature when I graduated (at 17, not 19). I chose the colleges I applied to based on proximity to skiing. But you know what? It all worked out very well in the end. I think the education I got in HS prepared me well for college and graduate school. I think 17 and 18 year olds are generally going to be immature in at least some ways whether they are at a big 3 school, big 10 school, great public school, crappy public school, whatever. In fact college bound kids at crappy public schools are probably the most mature because they have to be self motivated and independent and are much less likley to be helicoptered through life. So maybe that's where you need to be focusing your energy.
Our teenage DC so far are looking for: Division 1 sports, preferably ACC football (as a spectator, not player); great skiing at outdoor activities (thinking UColorado at Boulder); great city and shopping (thinking NYU or Georgetown); warm weather, good football (thinking a Florida state school); medical college on campus (thinking Florida, Pittsburgh or VCU). They all rank decent dining hall as important. That's what's important to them; what's important to you?
Anonymous wrote:OP I went to a Big 3 school and in many ways I was immature when I graduated (at 17, not 19). I chose the colleges I applied to based on proximity to skiing. But you know what? It all worked out very well in the end. I think the education I got in HS prepared me well for college and graduate school. I think 17 and 18 year olds are generally going to be immature in at least some ways whether they are at a big 3 school, big 10 school, great public school, crappy public school, whatever. In fact college bound kids at crappy public schools are probably the most mature because they have to be self motivated and independent and are much less likley to be helicoptered through life. So maybe that's where you need to be focusing your energy.