Anonymous wrote:Not the OP but wouldn't the 130 verbal put this kid in a gifted category, Especially given that the testers think his anxiety affected his performance? My daughter was a bit like this kid and improved a bunch when she switched to a school she loved.
Anonymous wrote:what about the other kid from above:
Verbal Comprehension 130 96%
Visual spatial 109 70%
Fluid reasoning. 104 58%
Working Memory 115 84%
Processing Speed 89 23%
Full scale. 111. 77%
The docs think anxiety a big factor. Will it be very hard to get into schools? we loved burke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"No, this would not be considered 2E. He may or may not be considered gifted, but there is no learning disability indicated since both major areas of intelligence (verbal and perceptual) are within the average range. That being said, some argue that the processing speed of 97, though average, is about 1.5 standard deviations above the GIA, and would be considered a 'frustrational profile' for a learning and is highly associated with anxiety and depression.
I'm the PP you were responding too. Like I said before, he is on the autism spectrum, which affects his reading comprehension and writing ability. But maybe autism isn't a learning disability?"
Above poster is wrong. Twice exceptional doesn't mean gifted plus learning disability. GT/LD can mean that, but 2E is meant to be a broader term to include gifted kids who also have other learning challenges including ADHD and autism. So gifted plus autistic is 2E.
I'm not sure if your son hits the "gifted" mark here. Generally, a FSIQ should not be calculated when there is a large spread (several standard deviations) between scores, and here there seems to be a pretty large spread between PRI and PSI. But a GAI (verbal + perceptive reasoning) can be calculated, since the spread between those isn't large. So GAI is your best score to use, which at 127 is just a tad below what psychologists consider "gifted." However, I'm not sure how the autism plays into the GAI; your tester should tell you this.
PP here. That was my point. Even the GAI doesn't meet the traditional gifted benchmark of 130.
Anonymous wrote:"No, this would not be considered 2E. He may or may not be considered gifted, but there is no learning disability indicated since both major areas of intelligence (verbal and perceptual) are within the average range. That being said, some argue that the processing speed of 97, though average, is about 1.5 standard deviations above the GIA, and would be considered a 'frustrational profile' for a learning and is highly associated with anxiety and depression.
I'm the PP you were responding too. Like I said before, he is on the autism spectrum, which affects his reading comprehension and writing ability. But maybe autism isn't a learning disability?"
Above poster is wrong. Twice exceptional doesn't mean gifted plus learning disability. GT/LD can mean that, but 2E is meant to be a broader term to include gifted kids who also have other learning challenges including ADHD and autism. So gifted plus autistic is 2E.
I'm not sure if your son hits the "gifted" mark here. Generally, a FSIQ should not be calculated when there is a large spread (several standard deviations) between scores, and here there seems to be a pretty large spread between PRI and PSI. But a GAI (verbal + perceptive reasoning) can be calculated, since the spread between those isn't large. So GAI is your best score to use, which at 127 is just a tad below what psychologists consider "gifted." However, I'm not sure how the autism plays into the GAI; your tester should tell you this.
Anonymous wrote:We recently had my child tested and they were diagnosed with mild-mod ADD and dysgraphia.
These were the scores from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale, IV.
Verbal Comprehension 126 96%
Perceptual Reasoning 104 61%
Working Memory 86 18%
Processing Speed 88 21%
Full Scale IQ 105 63%
General Ability 117 87%
So, the tester stated that my child is intellectually gifted, and I want to believe this.
But why is the IQ in the average range?
I'm just trying to understand this--is it because his working memory and processing speed are so low that they dragged down the overall IQ?
What number is actually more important, the Verbal Comprehension or the IQ?
If I should have posted this is another forum, I apologize in advance, just let me know where to go.
Thanks in advance.