Anonymous wrote:If it was itemized maybe he was only expensing his portion not the entire bill. You got a free lunch, you could have pick up the bill but you didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow everyone saying cheap, but I’d totally appreciate that he doesn’t needlessly spend money. If his company has a perk, I’d view it as a negative if he ignored it! That’s just leaving money on the table—pure profit going straight to people who have way more money already.
If this was your husband you'd be pissed he was using family money to pay for lunch when the company policy reimburses. Why would a woman expect a man she's dating to be bad with money? That's a red flag too.
Because OP and everyone else who jumped to conclusions are idiots.
Anonymous wrote:I recently started seeing a man (40s) and we met for a lunch date yesterday as our offices are close by.
He picked up the tab immediately but then he asked the waiter for the itemized bill so that obviously he could expense it to his company. I found that to be so utterly uncharming. Not so much being cheap, but more being dishonest.
Am I making something out of nothing?
Anonymous wrote:I recently started seeing a man (40s) and we met for a lunch date yesterday as our offices are close by.
He picked up the tab immediately but then he asked the waiter for the itemized bill so that obviously he could expense it to his company. I found that to be so utterly uncharming. Not so much being cheap, but more being dishonest.
Am I making something out of nothing?
Anonymous wrote:I mean in a way you were a business expense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Red Flag 🚩
He’s cheap and dishonest.
Move on.
Yes even if not dishonest he’s still cheap and wants to show he’s going to be that way from the start. I could see this as normal for committed partners but not at a first romantic date
The cheap one is the one who didn't split the bill or offer to pay.
Not true - he asked her out for lunch. He pays. If he wanted to be a saver he could have offered a coffee date . Would have allowed him to follow standard dating etiquette (which most women still value a lot), and show at least some chivalry.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter who asked, you split cost of a date unless equality is for your convenience only.
Anonymous wrote:My BF is CHEAP when it comes to expenses (I once heard him ask for a receipt for a soda at his hotel so he could include it in his travel expenses). He also sent in some XOXO small appliance because they had a lifetime warranty. For $9. I was amused.
But is he cheap when it comes to me? No. I’m rather thrifty myself and insisted on paying half for months after we started dating. Now he pays. He WANTS to pay.
I appreciate being with someone who works hard and expects value for his money. When his job reimburses him he takes advantage of it. And yes, he did comp 2 meals that I know of to his company. He did pay for my half though 😁
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow everyone saying cheap, but I’d totally appreciate that he doesn’t needlessly spend money. If his company has a perk, I’d view it as a negative if he ignored it! That’s just leaving money on the table—pure profit going straight to people who have way more money already.
If this was your husband you'd be pissed he was using family money to pay for lunch when the company policy reimburses. Why would a woman expect a man she's dating to be bad with money? That's a red flag too.
Because OP and everyone else who jumped to conclusions are idiots.