Anonymous wrote:
25% of 8% of the freshman class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
+1
There are kids right now at UCSD trying to major in STEM subjects who were placed in the middle school-and-below math class because they couldn't even multiply. At least the times tables would shift those kids to a less selective institution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS had a 790 on the math SAT and 750 RW SAT and didn't get in. Only UC he got into was UC Santa Cruz.
Meanwhile he got into Williams, Tufts, Carleton, Wesleyan, WashU and more.
Same SAT score for my son. He did get into a “higher” UC, but not Cal or UCLA.
I really, really doubt the UC AOs at other schools couldn’t distinguish these kids from kids at lower performing, predominantly Hispanic kids just because they didn’t have SAT scores. UC wants to force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs. The upper and mid tiers need a certain % of hispanicc kids. Requiring or not requiring SATs is not changing this. It will just piss people off more.
The test blind policy is already pissing off most STEM/Econ faculty.
They can still “force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs” and admit more Hispanic kids to the upper and mid tiers will a test-required policy. Just be transparent with the scores even if you want to admit low-scoring kids to Cal/UCLA! If anything, studying for the SAT/ACT helps those kids to get better prepared for a top college by building a better foundation in the very basic math and language skills.
Given the political makeup of the state, there is no way a policy that results in fewer Hispanic students getting into top UC's will ever be implemented.
My kid is at UCLA and surprised by how few Black students there are. Meanwhile, being on campus feels like you are in Asia.
The Black population of California high school students is only 5%. UCalifornia's low scores in high school are from the increased number of Hispanic students.
6.5 black. 22% Hispanic. 34% Asian.
Black students make up fewer than 5% of students in California.
https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/ceffingertipfacts.asp
and
https://www.ed-data.org/State/CA/ps_MTIxMDE2
Hispanic: 56%
White: 19.7%
Asian: 10.3%
Black: 4.8%
Something like less than 20% of Hispanic students even meet the basic standards in Math and Reading per state tests. Forget exceeds.
UC math, physics and chemistry at least at the top six schools are hard core intense classes. Kids who score in the 700s in math on the SAT and get 5s in the AP get their butts kicked in those classes. Admissions into any major requiring those courses needs to be conditional on scoring high enough on the UC placement math and chem. If you don’t score high enough, then you get deferred to community college for a year and must achieve a 3.5 in intensive STEM courses. They could give guaranteed admission for these students if they can indeed catch up. If not then they don’t belong in those majors at a top UC. They can decide to change to an easier major or pursue these STEM majors at a less rigorous Cal State.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
+1
Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS had a 790 on the math SAT and 750 RW SAT and didn't get in. Only UC he got into was UC Santa Cruz.
Meanwhile he got into Williams, Tufts, Carleton, Wesleyan, WashU and more.
Same SAT score for my son. He did get into a “higher” UC, but not Cal or UCLA.
I really, really doubt the UC AOs at other schools couldn’t distinguish these kids from kids at lower performing, predominantly Hispanic kids just because they didn’t have SAT scores. UC wants to force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs. The upper and mid tiers need a certain % of hispanicc kids. Requiring or not requiring SATs is not changing this. It will just piss people off more.
The test blind policy is already pissing off most STEM/Econ faculty.
They can still “force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs” and admit more Hispanic kids to the upper and mid tiers will a test-required policy. Just be transparent with the scores even if you want to admit low-scoring kids to Cal/UCLA! If anything, studying for the SAT/ACT helps those kids to get better prepared for a top college by building a better foundation in the very basic math and language skills.
Given the political makeup of the state, there is no way a policy that results in fewer Hispanic students getting into top UC's will ever be implemented.
My kid is at UCLA and surprised by how few Black students there are. Meanwhile, being on campus feels like you are in Asia.
The Black population of California high school students is only 5%. UCalifornia's low scores in high school are from the increased number of Hispanic students.
6.5 black. 22% Hispanic. 34% Asian.
Black students make up fewer than 5% of students in California.
https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/ceffingertipfacts.asp
and
https://www.ed-data.org/State/CA/ps_MTIxMDE2
Hispanic: 56%
White: 19.7%
Asian: 10.3%
Black: 4.8%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS had a 790 on the math SAT and 750 RW SAT and didn't get in. Only UC he got into was UC Santa Cruz.
Meanwhile he got into Williams, Tufts, Carleton, Wesleyan, WashU and more.
Same SAT score for my son. He did get into a “higher” UC, but not Cal or UCLA.
I really, really doubt the UC AOs at other schools couldn’t distinguish these kids from kids at lower performing, predominantly Hispanic kids just because they didn’t have SAT scores. UC wants to force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs. The upper and mid tiers need a certain % of hispanicc kids. Requiring or not requiring SATs is not changing this. It will just piss people off more.
The test blind policy is already pissing off most STEM/Econ faculty.
They can still “force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs” and admit more Hispanic kids to the upper and mid tiers will a test-required policy. Just be transparent with the scores even if you want to admit low-scoring kids to Cal/UCLA! If anything, studying for the SAT/ACT helps those kids to get better prepared for a top college by building a better foundation in the very basic math and language skills.
Given the political makeup of the state, there is no way a policy that results in fewer Hispanic students getting into top UC's will ever be implemented.
My kid is at UCLA and surprised by how few Black students there are. Meanwhile, being on campus feels like you are in Asia.
The Black population of California high school students is only 5%. UCalifornia's low scores in high school are from the increased number of Hispanic students.
6.5 black. 22% Hispanic. 34% Asian.
Black students make up fewer than 5% of students in California.
https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/ceffingertipfacts.asp
and
https://www.ed-data.org/State/CA/ps_MTIxMDE2
Hispanic: 56%
White: 19.7%
Asian: 10.3%
Black: 4.8%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS had a 790 on the math SAT and 750 RW SAT and didn't get in. Only UC he got into was UC Santa Cruz.
Meanwhile he got into Williams, Tufts, Carleton, Wesleyan, WashU and more.
Same SAT score for my son. He did get into a “higher” UC, but not Cal or UCLA.
I really, really doubt the UC AOs at other schools couldn’t distinguish these kids from kids at lower performing, predominantly Hispanic kids just because they didn’t have SAT scores. UC wants to force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs. The upper and mid tiers need a certain % of hispanicc kids. Requiring or not requiring SATs is not changing this. It will just piss people off more.
The test blind policy is already pissing off most STEM/Econ faculty.
They can still “force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs” and admit more Hispanic kids to the upper and mid tiers will a test-required policy. Just be transparent with the scores even if you want to admit low-scoring kids to Cal/UCLA! If anything, studying for the SAT/ACT helps those kids to get better prepared for a top college by building a better foundation in the very basic math and language skills.
Given the political makeup of the state, there is no way a policy that results in fewer Hispanic students getting into top UC's will ever be implemented.
My kid is at UCLA and surprised by how few Black students there are. Meanwhile, being on campus feels like you are in Asia.
The Black population of California high school students is only 5%. UCalifornia's low scores in high school are from the increased number of Hispanic students.
6.5 black. 22% Hispanic. 34% Asian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
Yet, universities have found that it's a fairly accurate message of how well a student does in college, including a UC study.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
Yet, universities have found that it's a fairly accurate message of how well a student does in college, including a UC study.
Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
Anonymous wrote:
It’s a shit measuring stick. It’s like trying to evaluate if someone should be an engineer by asking them their times tables quickly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS had a 790 on the math SAT and 750 RW SAT and didn't get in. Only UC he got into was UC Santa Cruz.
Meanwhile he got into Williams, Tufts, Carleton, Wesleyan, WashU and more.
Same SAT score for my son. He did get into a “higher” UC, but not Cal or UCLA.
I really, really doubt the UC AOs at other schools couldn’t distinguish these kids from kids at lower performing, predominantly Hispanic kids just because they didn’t have SAT scores. UC wants to force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs. The upper and mid tiers need a certain % of hispanicc kids. Requiring or not requiring SATs is not changing this. It will just piss people off more.
The test blind policy is already pissing off most STEM/Econ faculty.
They can still “force top stat kids into the lower tiered UCs” and admit more Hispanic kids to the upper and mid tiers will a test-required policy. Just be transparent with the scores even if you want to admit low-scoring kids to Cal/UCLA! If anything, studying for the SAT/ACT helps those kids to get better prepared for a top college by building a better foundation in the very basic math and language skills.
Given the political makeup of the state, there is no way a policy that results in fewer Hispanic students getting into top UC's will ever be implemented.
My kid is at UCLA and surprised by how few Black students there are. Meanwhile, being on campus feels like you are in Asia.
The Black population of California high school students is only 5%. UCalifornia's low scores in high school are from the increased number of Hispanic students.