Anonymous wrote:Pomona: 420 freshman
156 submitted an SAT
39 scored above 1550, or 9%
Amherst: 485 freshman
192 submitted an SAT score
48 scored above 1540, or 9.8%
They look pretty similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pomona: 420 freshman
156 submitted an SAT
39 scored above 1550, or 9%
Amherst: 485 freshman
192 submitted an SAT score
48 scored above 1540, or 9.8%
They look pretty similar.
So my DC who comfortably scored 1560 without a tutor may be too high-performing (test score wise anyway) for Pomona and Amherst, and not high-performing enough for schools like Northwest, Brown, Penn, Duke. What schools are in between those?
Anonymous wrote:The dorms are among the best within their peer group.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also want to concur that I have heard that Amherst is hoarding their endowment and the campus looks dumpy.
We were there a year ago when touring most of the NSECAC's and a few ivies. We thought the campus was beautiful - greenspace and buildings both.
Their facilities are behind peers, beside the science center. They really need to work on capital investments soon.
Amherst has a brand new (and huge) student center opening this fall, with a new cafeteria also.
After years of construction. And that’s not really helping when they have outdated academic facilities.
Some of the academic facilities are a little ugly, but so what? The ones where the facility matter (science) have an excellent building, and all of the buildings are otherwise in good condition.
Anonymous wrote:The dorms are among the best within their peer group.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also want to concur that I have heard that Amherst is hoarding their endowment and the campus looks dumpy.
We were there a year ago when touring most of the NSECAC's and a few ivies. We thought the campus was beautiful - greenspace and buildings both.
Their facilities are behind peers, beside the science center. They really need to work on capital investments soon.
Amherst has a brand new (and huge) student center opening this fall, with a new cafeteria also.
After years of construction. And that’s not really helping when they have outdated academic facilities.
Some of the academic facilities are a little ugly, but so what? The ones where the facility matter (science) have an excellent building, and all of the buildings are otherwise in good condition.
Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:We really like Pomona, Williams, Bowdoin.
Amherst felt dumpy, sorry to say. And nobody's first choice. Even the athletes - which are now over 40% of kids - seemed to be "this was the most prestigious school I got recruited for" ie more about the name than any passion to be there.
The average person has not heard of Pomona College in LA. They will confuse it with Cal Poly Pomona. The smartest kids that stay back in LA attend UCLA, Cal Tech and maybe Harvey Mudd.
Anonymous wrote:Is Amherst less woke than Pomona?
The dorms are among the best within their peer group.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also want to concur that I have heard that Amherst is hoarding their endowment and the campus looks dumpy.
We were there a year ago when touring most of the NSECAC's and a few ivies. We thought the campus was beautiful - greenspace and buildings both.
Their facilities are behind peers, beside the science center. They really need to work on capital investments soon.
Amherst has a brand new (and huge) student center opening this fall, with a new cafeteria also.
After years of construction. And that’s not really helping when they have outdated academic facilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pomona: 420 freshman
156 submitted an SAT
39 scored above 1550, or 9%
Amherst: 485 freshman
192 submitted an SAT score
48 scored above 1540, or 9.8%
They look pretty similar.
So my DC who comfortably scored 1560 without a tutor may be too high-performing (test score wise anyway) for Pomona and Amherst, and not high-performing enough for schools like Northwest, Brown, Penn, Duke. What schools are in between those?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pomona: 420 freshman
156 submitted an SAT
39 scored above 1550, or 9%
Amherst: 485 freshman
192 submitted an SAT score
48 scored above 1540, or 9.8%
They look pretty similar.
So my DC who comfortably scored 1560 without a tutor may be too high-performing (test score wise anyway) for Pomona and Amherst, and not high-performing enough for schools like Northwest, Brown, Penn, Duke. What schools are in between those?
Anonymous wrote:Pomona: 420 freshman
156 submitted an SAT
39 scored above 1550, or 9%
Amherst: 485 freshman
192 submitted an SAT score
48 scored above 1540, or 9.8%
They look pretty similar.
Anonymous wrote:Pomona: 420 freshman
156 submitted an SAT
39 scored above 1550, or 9%
Amherst: 485 freshman
192 submitted an SAT score
48 scored above 1540, or 9.8%
They look pretty similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also want to concur that I have heard that Amherst is hoarding their endowment and the campus looks dumpy.
We were there a year ago when touring most of the NSECAC's and a few ivies. We thought the campus was beautiful - greenspace and buildings both.
Their facilities are behind peers, beside the science center. They really need to work on capital investments soon.
Amherst has a brand new (and huge) student center opening this fall, with a new cafeteria also.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also want to concur that I have heard that Amherst is hoarding their endowment and the campus looks dumpy.
We were there a year ago when touring most of the NSECAC's and a few ivies. We thought the campus was beautiful - greenspace and buildings both.
Their facilities are behind peers, beside the science center. They really need to work on capital investments soon.