Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not first cut all the waste? DC is spending money like drunk sailors.
What are the specific cuts you propose?
DC is giving restaurants $50,000 each. Why is the city giving $50,000 to for-profit businesses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not first cut all the waste? DC is spending money like drunk sailors.
What are the specific cuts you propose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not first cut all the waste? DC is spending money like drunk sailors.
What are the specific cuts you propose?
Total spending by the DC government has gone up by about 30 percent over the past five years. Has your salary gone up by 30 percent in five years?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
Tell me you're 21 years old, without telling me you're 21 years old.
Do you have any idea the average/media income in the District of Columbia?
Hint: well below $250k.
Average/mean income is stupid when you have such a gigantic percentage of the population that doesn’t work at all.
Median income for the district of Columbia is — you ready? $109k/ yr !!! Multiply that by two and you get 218,000. Which means that two people living together in an apartment making 250,000 or slightly above the median are not “rich.” They’re middle class BY DEFINITION. For DC. Which is a different and much more expensive city than Minot ND and Greenville SC
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
Tell me you're 21 years old, without telling me you're 21 years old.
Do you have any idea the average/media income in the District of Columbia?
Hint: well below $250k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
That's totally absurd. By your definition, basically everyone who works for the DC or federal government is rich.
Do you ever wonder why middle America hates coastal elites?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
That's totally absurd. By your definition, basically everyone who works for the DC or federal government is rich.
Do you ever wonder why middle America hates coastal elites?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
Tell me you're 21 years old, without telling me you're 21 years old.
Do you have any idea the average/media income in the District of Columbia?
Hint: well below $250k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
Tell me you're 21 years old, without telling me you're 21 years old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
That's totally absurd. By your definition, basically everyone who works for the DC or federal government is rich.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not first cut all the waste? DC is spending money like drunk sailors.
What are the specific cuts you propose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser tells city council we don't need tax hikes and that it shouldn't make tax policy with zero public input. I think we might miss Bowser when she's gone.
https://x.com/maustermuhle/status/2061830072856641927/photo/1
Couples who make more than $250,000 are rich?
Uh, yes?
A married couple who are both teachers in DCPS, and who have two kids, are rich?
If you think $250k+ household income isn't doing pretty well, I don't know what to tell you.
Anonymous wrote:Cut the vouchers that triggered a spike in crime. Cut the Chevy Chase Rec Center development project that will enrich developers. That guy needs to go. And cut the and reverse approvals for pot dispensaries basically adjacent to high schools. Total disaster. Anyone notice dispensaries NOT located near schools in WARD 3? Seems to be a feature, not a bug.