Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People, please kindly use condoms if you don’t want to raise your kids properly. I know you’re gonna complain you can’t afford condoms. But obviously you can afford $500 shinny shoes and $300 coffee every month.
Go F yourself
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are poorer students at disadvantage for research? Do you mean dumber students or are you just witch hunting?
I'm thinking about local programs that I know of that are equitable in their selection, rigorous, and prestigious for high school research positions. The GMU summer one (forget the name), JHU APL, or even small things at MD or Georgetown. Yes, there are some remote opportunities but not all and they're not preferred. So if a poor kid gets selected, HOW of they get there? Their car? Mom's car? Dad's car? Any car? No? Also are they paid? So, when can they go make money to pay for college, or help with rent? Yeah, I don't think they meant dumber. I think they were talking about real systemic disadvantages.
Some posters on this board refuse to put themselves in other people’s schools. Very smart low income kids still have huge hurdles to climb to be able to participate in these research, internship, programs. Smart females sometimes even have to fight their own parents to achieve their dreams. The playing field is not equal.
Anonymous wrote:People, please kindly use condoms if you don’t want to raise your kids properly. I know you’re gonna complain you can’t afford condoms. But obviously you can afford $500 shinny shoes and $300 coffee every month.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw this Reddit comment about research in high school (https://old.reddit.com/r/AskProfessors/comments/1tg9z5l/high_schooler_interning_at_a_toptier_research/omfaesb/):
“Sigh. High school students shouldn't be doing this.
Maybe just enjoy what's left of your childhood?
And don't participate in things that pad your college applications in a way that's totally unfair to other students who aren't connected to/don't live near/can't afford/don't know about intern opportunities at research universities.
But really this is on the professor who's supporting this nonsense.”
So if students shouldn’t be doing this, what extracurriculars should they do? Even things like sports or robotics favor the privilege
What’s left of your childhood?
100 years ago these kids would be working in factories and on farms. Some would be married with families.This notion of some mythical, sacrosanct “childhood” is a modern invention.
+1000
Life is unfair and apparently DCUM just now realized it.
Being born American is an unfair advantage over the vast majority of the world population.
Being born to rich parents is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a two parent household is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a household with a stay at home parent is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a parent who is dedicated to education is an unfair advantage.
Being in a good neighborhood with lots of educated families is an unfair advantage.
A child who has none of these is at a huge disadvantage to one who has several or all of these.
These advantages are not unfair. They are the product of prior planning and sacrifice.
You aren’t bright enough to step in. Please stay on the sidelines of the conversation.
I’m sorry you’re too dumb to understand that my kids have advantages because I planned it that way, just as my parents made those plans for me.
That is fabulous for you and your kids. Congratulations! You get a cookie.
I also think that your kid’s research position should not bear more weight in the application process than the kid that worked 30 hours a week at Wendy’s during the school year.
Anonymous wrote:The true, underlying issue here is the unresolved societal problem of income inequality.
If we could only solve the income inequality problem, almost every other problem would disappear, including this student-research problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw this Reddit comment about research in high school (https://old.reddit.com/r/AskProfessors/comments/1tg9z5l/high_schooler_interning_at_a_toptier_research/omfaesb/):
“Sigh. High school students shouldn't be doing this.
Maybe just enjoy what's left of your childhood?
And don't participate in things that pad your college applications in a way that's totally unfair to other students who aren't connected to/don't live near/can't afford/don't know about intern opportunities at research universities.
But really this is on the professor who's supporting this nonsense.”
So if students shouldn’t be doing this, what extracurriculars should they do? Even things like sports or robotics favor the privilege
What’s left of your childhood?
100 years ago these kids would be working in factories and on farms. Some would be married with families.This notion of some mythical, sacrosanct “childhood” is a modern invention.
+1000
Life is unfair and apparently DCUM just now realized it.
Being born American is an unfair advantage over the vast majority of the world population.
Being born to rich parents is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a two parent household is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a household with a stay at home parent is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a parent who is dedicated to education is an unfair advantage.
Being in a good neighborhood with lots of educated families is an unfair advantage.
A child who has none of these is at a huge disadvantage to one who has several or all of these.
These advantages are not unfair. They are the product of prior planning and sacrifice.
You aren’t bright enough to step in. Please stay on the sidelines of the conversation.
I’m sorry you’re too dumb to understand that my kids have advantages because I planned it that way, just as my parents made those plans for me.
That is fabulous for you and your kids. Congratulations! You get a cookie.
I also think that your kid’s research position should not bear more weight in the application process than the kid that worked 30 hours a week at Wendy’s during the school year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are poorer students at disadvantage for research? Do you mean dumber students or are you just witch hunting?
I'm thinking about local programs that I know of that are equitable in their selection, rigorous, and prestigious for high school research positions. The GMU summer one (forget the name), JHU APL, or even small things at MD or Georgetown. Yes, there are some remote opportunities but not all and they're not preferred. So if a poor kid gets selected, HOW of they get there? Their car? Mom's car? Dad's car? Any car? No? Also are they paid? So, when can they go make money to pay for college, or help with rent? Yeah, I don't think they meant dumber. I think they were talking about real systemic disadvantages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw this Reddit comment about research in high school (https://old.reddit.com/r/AskProfessors/comments/1tg9z5l/high_schooler_interning_at_a_toptier_research/omfaesb/):
“Sigh. High school students shouldn't be doing this.
Maybe just enjoy what's left of your childhood?
And don't participate in things that pad your college applications in a way that's totally unfair to other students who aren't connected to/don't live near/can't afford/don't know about intern opportunities at research universities.
But really this is on the professor who's supporting this nonsense.”
So if students shouldn’t be doing this, what extracurriculars should they do? Even things like sports or robotics favor the privilege
What’s left of your childhood?
100 years ago these kids would be working in factories and on farms. Some would be married with families.This notion of some mythical, sacrosanct “childhood” is a modern invention.
+1000
Life is unfair and apparently DCUM just now realized it.
Being born American is an unfair advantage over the vast majority of the world population.
Being born to rich parents is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a two parent household is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a household with a stay at home parent is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a parent who is dedicated to education is an unfair advantage.
Being in a good neighborhood with lots of educated families is an unfair advantage.
A child who has none of these is at a huge disadvantage to one who has several or all of these.
These advantages are not unfair. They are the product of prior planning and sacrifice.
You aren’t bright enough to step in. Please stay on the sidelines of the conversation.
I’m sorry you’re too dumb to understand that my kids have advantages because I planned it that way, just as my parents made those plans for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw this Reddit comment about research in high school (https://old.reddit.com/r/AskProfessors/comments/1tg9z5l/high_schooler_interning_at_a_toptier_research/omfaesb/):
“Sigh. High school students shouldn't be doing this.
Maybe just enjoy what's left of your childhood?
And don't participate in things that pad your college applications in a way that's totally unfair to other students who aren't connected to/don't live near/can't afford/don't know about intern opportunities at research universities.
But really this is on the professor who's supporting this nonsense.”
So if students shouldn’t be doing this, what extracurriculars should they do? Even things like sports or robotics favor the privilege
What’s left of your childhood?
100 years ago these kids would be working in factories and on farms. Some would be married with families.This notion of some mythical, sacrosanct “childhood” is a modern invention.
+1000
Life is unfair and apparently DCUM just now realized it.
Being born American is an unfair advantage over the vast majority of the world population.
Being born to rich parents is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a two parent household is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a household with a stay at home parent is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a parent who is dedicated to education is an unfair advantage.
Being in a good neighborhood with lots of educated families is an unfair advantage.
A child who has none of these is at a huge disadvantage to one who has several or all of these.
These advantages are not unfair. They are the product of prior planning and sacrifice.
You aren’t bright enough to step in. Please stay on the sidelines of the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are poorer students at disadvantage for research? Do you mean dumber students or are you just witch hunting?
I'm thinking about local programs that I know of that are equitable in their selection, rigorous, and prestigious for high school research positions. The GMU summer one (forget the name), JHU APL, or even small things at MD or Georgetown. Yes, there are some remote opportunities but not all and they're not preferred. So if a poor kid gets selected, HOW of they get there? Their car? Mom's car? Dad's car? Any car? No? Also are they paid? So, when can they go make money to pay for college, or help with rent? Yeah, I don't think they meant dumber. I think they were talking about real systemic disadvantages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw this Reddit comment about research in high school (https://old.reddit.com/r/AskProfessors/comments/1tg9z5l/high_schooler_interning_at_a_toptier_research/omfaesb/):
“Sigh. High school students shouldn't be doing this.
Maybe just enjoy what's left of your childhood?
And don't participate in things that pad your college applications in a way that's totally unfair to other students who aren't connected to/don't live near/can't afford/don't know about intern opportunities at research universities.
But really this is on the professor who's supporting this nonsense.”
So if students shouldn’t be doing this, what extracurriculars should they do? Even things like sports or robotics favor the privilege
What’s left of your childhood?
100 years ago these kids would be working in factories and on farms. Some would be married with families.This notion of some mythical, sacrosanct “childhood” is a modern invention.
+1000
Life is unfair and apparently DCUM just now realized it.
Being born American is an unfair advantage over the vast majority of the world population.
Being born to rich parents is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a two parent household is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a household with a stay at home parent is an unfair advantage.
Being born to a parent who is dedicated to education is an unfair advantage.
Being in a good neighborhood with lots of educated families is an unfair advantage.
A child who has none of these is at a huge disadvantage to one who has several or all of these.
These advantages are not unfair. They are the product of prior planning and sacrifice.