Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These are union positions. If someone is, let’s say a Staff Development Teacher (in the first tranche of cuts) with 20 years in MCPS wouldn’t they just have to take an open position elsewhere in the county? If the school has an opening, they could take that position. If it does not and they want to stay in the school, then the last hired teacher would be cut, not the teacher with 20 years.
As an MCEA member, this is how I understand the current situation.
**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
I wonder how much they could save if they stopped offering full insurance benefits to staff who are only working a 0.5 allocation. Make it available only to people working 0.7 or more, or give people working 0.5-0.7 Kaiser as their only option, or something. Health care costs are huge, MCPS pays a very large percentage, and I don't know of another employer that gives workers high quality insurance at low cost like this for only working 2.5 days a week. I'm sure this is MCEA blasphemy, but whatever.
I disagree with this. The pay for SEIU members are so low and the only reason why some of us are taking permanent part time positions with MCPS is for the benefits and work life balance. I will quit in a heartbeat if I don’t have my insurance benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These are union positions. If someone is, let’s say a Staff Development Teacher (in the first tranche of cuts) with 20 years in MCPS wouldn’t they just have to take an open position elsewhere in the county? If the school has an opening, they could take that position. If it does not and they want to stay in the school, then the last hired teacher would be cut, not the teacher with 20 years.
As an MCEA member, this is how I understand the current situation.
**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
I wonder how much they could save if they stopped offering full insurance benefits to staff who are only working a 0.5 allocation. Make it available only to people working 0.7 or more, or give people working 0.5-0.7 Kaiser as their only option, or something. Health care costs are huge, MCPS pays a very large percentage, and I don't know of another employer that gives workers high quality insurance at low cost like this for only working 2.5 days a week. I'm sure this is MCEA blasphemy, but whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of pouring money into recruiting and training to attract more teachers into the profession when they come to MCPS and Taylor sends them notices they are being let go because he is pouting?
Way to kill off the next generation of teachers TT. All because you didn’t get a few extra dollars in your $3,775,000,000 budget.
Are you saying teachers are being laid off over the weekend before Taylor even gets approval from the Board of Ed on who to fire/what to cut to plug the deficit?!
Taylor sent letters to individuals telling them their job would be cut if he didn’t get every last penny he was demanding. Yes, Taylor threatened individuals without Board of Education authorization.
Are you talking about the letters last week saying their jobs were at threat? Or did he actually tell people in the last few days that they have actually been fired?
If you are just talking about the former-- I deeply disagree with and dislike Taylor, but he was asked by County Council to make lists to tell them who would be laid off depending on how much funding was passed or not. And honestly, I kind of feel like it would be *more* disrespectful to put a list out there saying certain of your employees are in line to be cut but then not say anything to those employees directly?
+1
It's not his call to fire individual teachers. The Board of Education hasn't even decided how to handle the budget they are being given by the Council. The Board could decide to fire administrators.
Not the point. The letter was not firing anyone. It was giving them a heads-up that their positions were included in the lists for the council.
Correct. It’s a notification so if the decision is made no one can say they weren’t notified timely.
Anonymous wrote:These are union positions. If someone is, let’s say a Staff Development Teacher (in the first tranche of cuts) with 20 years in MCPS wouldn’t they just have to take an open position elsewhere in the county? If the school has an opening, they could take that position. If it does not and they want to stay in the school, then the last hired teacher would be cut, not the teacher with 20 years.
As an MCEA member, this is how I understand the current situation.
**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
DP. I agree. The problem with pausing step increases is that it has a cumulative effect. MCEA has negotiated our contract and it should be honored. It’s year 2 of 2 and that was a hard won contract! 27-28 we will have to start over and MCPS will be in a deficit, there is almost zero chance of step increases then. Better take it while we can.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
How do you think that will go over? And how does it work? Does the union decide? Do MCEA members vote?
I don’t know that it will go over well. In 2009 it was a tough sell but the majority were behind it. I feel less confident that it would pass this time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
How do you think that will go over? And how does it work? Does the union decide? Do MCEA members vote?
I don’t know that it will go over well. In 2009 it was a tough sell but the majority were behind it. I feel less confident that it would pass this time.
Unfortunately compensation costs are increasing faster than county revenues, which means unless compensation increases slow down, working conditions are going to keep getting worse and worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
How do you think that will go over? And how does it work? Does the union decide? Do MCEA members vote?
I don’t know that it will go over well. In 2009 it was a tough sell but the majority were behind it. I feel less confident that it would pass this time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
How do you think that will go over? And how does it work? Does the union decide? Do MCEA members vote?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
How do you think that will go over? And how does it work? Does the union decide? Do MCEA members vote?
Not the PP but yes, in 2009 the unions advocated strongly for members to vote to pause our step increases and CoLas due to the financial crisis. The vote passed and it took years to get those steps back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
How do you think that will go over? And how does it work? Does the union decide? Do MCEA members vote?
Anonymous wrote:**But I still think there is going to be a last minute push for the unions to vote to forego our raises to save these jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of pouring money into recruiting and training to attract more teachers into the profession when they come to MCPS and Taylor sends them notices they are being let go because he is pouting?
Way to kill off the next generation of teachers TT. All because you didn’t get a few extra dollars in your $3,775,000,000 budget.
Are you saying teachers are being laid off over the weekend before Taylor even gets approval from the Board of Ed on who to fire/what to cut to plug the deficit?!
Taylor sent letters to individuals telling them their job would be cut if he didn’t get every last penny he was demanding. Yes, Taylor threatened individuals without Board of Education authorization.
Are you talking about the letters last week saying their jobs were at threat? Or did he actually tell people in the last few days that they have actually been fired?
If you are just talking about the former-- I deeply disagree with and dislike Taylor, but he was asked by County Council to make lists to tell them who would be laid off depending on how much funding was passed or not. And honestly, I kind of feel like it would be *more* disrespectful to put a list out there saying certain of your employees are in line to be cut but then not say anything to those employees directly?
+1
It's not his call to fire individual teachers. The Board of Education hasn't even decided how to handle the budget they are being given by the Council. The Board could decide to fire administrators.
Not the point. The letter was not firing anyone. It was giving them a heads-up that their positions were included in the lists for the council.