Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They won't guarantee housing past the first year and Burlington has gotten really seedy and unsafe. They threw a lot of aid at my kid, extended deadlines, etc -no bite. Much easier to get in to than it has been..much less appealing.
My kid was accepted to Eastman Conservatory at Rochester. They received the max talent scholarship, then the university kept throwing more money at them to bring it below in state tuition.
The conservatory itself was amazing. But Rochester is a dump whose glory days ended in the early 1960s. Dirty, boarded up storefronts, open crime during the day a half block from campus.
No thanks.
Give us a safe, clean, beautiful SEC campus any day over a depressing, dirty, run down crime ridden depleted city in one of those blue areas that everyone is fleeing from.
It's a shame, because the conservatory is amazing. Just not amazing enough to balance out that it's in one of those formerly nice northeast small cities that no one, not even the liberals who created the mess, want to live in anymore.
Anonymous wrote:I saw this article on FB and it is an interesting look at homelessness in Burlington
https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/as-encampments-surge-in-burlington-two-men-address-problems-44219021/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the Democrats letting Burlington turn into a hell-hole had nothing to do with it.
Oh, look. It's the "Democrats are dEsTrOyIng cities" poster.
I'm a Democrat, but turning our downtowns into open fetty dens has not been a good look for us.
And it is undeniable that a significant majority of rich white liberals in blue cities and states like Vermont are simply not having children.
You can't sustain undesirable universities if your community isn't having kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the Democrats letting Burlington turn into a hell-hole had nothing to do with it.
Oh, look. It's the "Democrats are dEsTrOyIng cities" poster.
I'm a Democrat, but turning our downtowns into open fetty dens has not been a good look for us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Letting blue cities go to pot is a worse problem than rural opioid deaths, because blue cities are our centers of finance, education, productivity, and basically national life. If people won't go downtown out of fear of being stabbed or at least aggressively panhandled, precious cultural institutions like UVM will wither on the vine. It's a vicious cycle and it doesn't need to happen.
There are no significant differences in blue/red state cities. Portland did allow things to get out of control and they have paid the price. If you want to see dystopian hellholes check out the hollowed our rust belt cities of red middle America or the ex-textile furniture cities of the South.
Anonymous wrote:Letting blue cities go to pot is a worse problem than rural opioid deaths, because blue cities are our centers of finance, education, productivity, and basically national life. If people won't go downtown out of fear of being stabbed or at least aggressively panhandled, precious cultural institutions like UVM will wither on the vine. It's a vicious cycle and it doesn't need to happen.