Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/us/politics/usaid-former-employees.html?unlocked_article_code=1.dVA.hZzP.r8swcF4qBfqp&smid=url-share
Anonymous wrote:I was fired from my job at USAID. I worked in the woodchuck department. We were so close to finding out how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Now we will probably never know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A nonprofit? Wasn't USAID an agency? What am I missing?
OP are you ok? USAID isn't a nonprofit.
What was she doing for $272K a year that someone else couldn't do for say $120K or even $100K?
I do belive there are a ton of people being way overpaid in large cities like DC.
Anonymous wrote:A nonprofit? Wasn't USAID an agency? What am I missing?
Anonymous wrote:USAID got killed because Elon was following Mike Benz on twitter and believed in his conspiracy theories. A lot of people died as a result.
This did not happen because of corruption, and if you actually care about corruption, you should be livid every single day at this administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know some people aren't going to like hearing this but USAID wasn't just feeding poor kids in Africa. That was only a tiny percentage of USAID work and actually still goes on under State.
Most of USAID was pet projects and donor causes f9r liberals and an entire NGO industry grew up around it, often started by former USAIDers. And when something like that happens, you find a lot of cronyism. It's sort of comparable to big city government machines finding plum jobs and sinecures for their supporters. And it went unchecked and unregulated, so admin salaries at the NGOs exploded. Some founders became quite rich acting as contractors. And while some good projects happened, a lot of it was dubious and just another way to slosh billions around consultants and contractors with people feeding from the trough both in DC and on the ground overseas and the % that actually ended up being used for genuinely good outcomes is much smaller than most people realize. And USAID was definitely used to indirectly send money undercover to entities overseas.
USAID did become a liberal sinecure entity, using taxpayer dollars to effectively reward liberal supporters and connections. It's why the Trump administration moved so fast to shut it down. And it's also why no one is missing USAID. Only maybe 1% genuinely ended up helping villagers in developing countries.
I'm sorry for the people in the article but the whole industry was rampant with cronyism and out of touch.
100
The destruction of USAID was estimated to have caused 600,000 deaths as of last November. Probably at least 1 million by now
Citation?
Anonymous wrote:I have always thought that USAID was mainly used as a cover for CIA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get back to us when your whole industry goes away, OP.
This. The job market in this geographic area is damaged by DOGE and the job market in her specific field was destroyed. That doesn't mean she was overpaid for the work she did before that happened. It means the world changed.
It was a fake job market, a big scam to funnel money to an industry that shouldn't exist except to fund itself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know some people aren't going to like hearing this but USAID wasn't just feeding poor kids in Africa. That was only a tiny percentage of USAID work and actually still goes on under State.
Most of USAID was pet projects and donor causes f9r liberals and an entire NGO industry grew up around it, often started by former USAIDers. And when something like that happens, you find a lot of cronyism. It's sort of comparable to big city government machines finding plum jobs and sinecures for their supporters. And it went unchecked and unregulated, so admin salaries at the NGOs exploded. Some founders became quite rich acting as contractors. And while some good projects happened, a lot of it was dubious and just another way to slosh billions around consultants and contractors with people feeding from the trough both in DC and on the ground overseas and the % that actually ended up being used for genuinely good outcomes is much smaller than most people realize. And USAID was definitely used to indirectly send money undercover to entities overseas.
USAID did become a liberal sinecure entity, using taxpayer dollars to effectively reward liberal supporters and connections. It's why the Trump administration moved so fast to shut it down. And it's also why no one is missing USAID. Only maybe 1% genuinely ended up helping villagers in developing countries.
I'm sorry for the people in the article but the whole industry was rampant with cronyism and out of touch.
100
The destruction of USAID was estimated to have caused 600,000 deaths as of last November. Probably at least 1 million by now
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IDK 272K is outrageous for a non-profit.
Go read the 990 tax forms of non profits. For many of the so-called trade associations, the executive director/ceo makes millions.
Who pays these salaries? Members's dues of the trade associations? Or the government? Genuinely curious.