Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My varsity athlete followed a different path than everyone else on the thread I think. Played mostly rec and all-stars / select, but took lessons to specialize in a position. That kept it fun but not intense. But she had friends who followed the same path and definitely hit the drop-out point, so I don't think her path is a guarantee of anything. Having multiple daughters I have seen over and over again that sometimes early specialization really works for a girl. Sometimes it really doesn't. Sometimes kids will bounce to a new sport even in high school. Sometimes kids will act like they aren't interested and yet keep playing. There are SO many variables.
I think the biggest things is: know your own daughter, make sure being active and involved in sport is a team value, and support her taking things the direction she wants to take them (with a little pushing on follow-through where needed, but again know your kid).
So are you saying that your kids only played one or two sports their whole lives?
We did a little dabbling in the preschool years but other than a year of swim she picked softball only at 8, her choice.
Look I'm not saying it is the right answer. I'm saying it was right for her.
Anonymous wrote:
Sadly, I feel this is true. I blame the so called non-profits who get exclusive use of the county turf fields and run the rec programs. Then, they use the rec programs to heavily recruit and promote FOMO for their travel program. They take most of the rec kids and tun the rec kids into 2k per year travel kids. -The rec program is decimated and no one really wants to play it by u13.
Anonymous wrote:I have this same question but for boys! It seems like if your kid plays soccer as a kindergartner on a mini-kicks style rec team, and has fun, and is good at it, the expectation is to have him in competitive U8 travel ball by second grade, and if you opt out of that, all that's left of the rec program by age 7 or 8 is the kids who have never played soccer before, or the kids without much athletic talent or much desire to play, since all of the moderately athletic kids who enjoy sports have moved on to a travel team. there seems to be zero middle ground between training for 6 hours a week, and kicking the ball around without a purpose with kids who don't want to be there. at age 7.
Anonymous wrote:I think kids should try a lot of stuff when they are young and then stick with something they like. Around here, the problem is that high school sports are too competitive -so kids with interest may not have a spot on the high school team and rec teams thin out around then too. I think developing an interest in a more life long sport can be important - running/walking/golf/swimming. Also, college can provide opportunities to try new things - crew, ultimate frisbee, intramural sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have an athletic daughter still playing two sports in high school.
We did not have her do any travel sports until middle school (which is 6th grade where we are). She continued regularly with about 4-5 sports recreationally until middle school. We had her try everything and focused on keeping her with friends and followed her lead.
I think avoiding early specialization is key. Early exposure isn't a bad thing, and certain sports like figure skating and gymnastics require it to succeed, but just don't get sucked into specialization. My oldest kid is now in high school, and the kids who didn't specialize until later caught up and, in some cases, passed the kids who specialized. Just focus on developing athletes who love sports and movements, and something will work out for them. Especially in the early years, it's all about building an athletic base.
This. It’s so important to be exposed to a big variety and to stay in a big variety of sports, since most kids need consistent exposure to develop enough proficiency to actually enjoy a sport. And puberty changes so much, so optionality is really key. But you can also start to tell a lot about your kids’ athletic orientation as they age.
Anonymous wrote:I think the most important thing is to impart a sense of athleticism for your kids... this will serve them well in their life as they will continue doing something - staying more fit and healthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have an athletic daughter still playing two sports in high school.
We did not have her do any travel sports until middle school (which is 6th grade where we are). She continued regularly with about 4-5 sports recreationally until middle school. We had her try everything and focused on keeping her with friends and followed her lead.
I think avoiding early specialization is key. Early exposure isn't a bad thing, and certain sports like figure skating and gymnastics require it to succeed, but just don't get sucked into specialization. My oldest kid is now in high school, and the kids who didn't specialize until later caught up and, in some cases, passed the kids who specialized. Just focus on developing athletes who love sports and movements, and something will work out for them. Especially in the early years, it's all about building an athletic base.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When your kid is running like this at 4-5 yrs old, you know she's got some innate talent. She's now thriving at the highest soccer level for U13 without us pushing her at all. Our job basically is to not f' it up.
https://imgur.com/JxjMfgz
why you sending pics of your kids here?
It's from 7 years ago and I'm not from "here" so yeah not too worried.
Weird
Also, which kid is mine and who am I - get it? Get off your high horse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When your kid is running like this at 4-5 yrs old, you know she's got some innate talent. She's now thriving at the highest soccer level for U13 without us pushing her at all. Our job basically is to not f' it up.
https://imgur.com/JxjMfgz
why you sending pics of your kids here?
It's from 7 years ago and I'm not from "here" so yeah not too worried.
Weird
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When your kid is running like this at 4-5 yrs old, you know she's got some innate talent. She's now thriving at the highest soccer level for U13 without us pushing her at all. Our job basically is to not f' it up.
https://imgur.com/JxjMfgz
why you sending pics of your kids here?
It's from 7 years ago and I'm not from "here" so yeah not too worried.
Weird
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When your kid is running like this at 4-5 yrs old, you know she's got some innate talent. She's now thriving at the highest soccer level for U13 without us pushing her at all. Our job basically is to not f' it up.
https://imgur.com/JxjMfgz
why you sending pics of your kids here?
It's from 7 years ago and I'm not from "here" so yeah not too worried.
Anonymous wrote:The options basically are:
(1) go “all in” with travel/specialization at an early age
(2) forgo all of that and just plan to join no-cut or less popular sports in middle & high school (track, cross country, wrestling, or a new sport being offered that needs players etc). Or play outside of school sports- like martial arts, rock climbing etc.
(3) play many sports at a rec level over the years & make the tail end of the high school roster…the travel kids can’t possibly take up ALL the roster spots can they?
(4) pay for a small private school where sports are (more or less) no-cut and/or move to an area with a smaller high school where it easier to make teams
Option 3 above is what a lot of parents hope for, I think. But- there will only be so many spots available. A lot of times those spots will go to kids who have certain physical attributes (like the 5’10” girl starting basketball late, or the 6’3” left handed pitcher who has only ever played rec baseball etc).
(1) worked for us with a kid who was up for it at every single checkpoint along the way