Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robinson, Lake Braddock or Hayfield.
Robinson and Lake Braddock are both filled with thugs, vaping, and fights. No discipline, terrible administrators.
I'd be happy with either pyramid (and have kids in one of them, and this take does not match their experience).
Would avoid Langley, contrary to many.
What's your beef with Langley?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robinson, Lake Braddock or Hayfield.
Robinson and Lake Braddock are both filled with thugs, vaping, and fights. No discipline, terrible administrators.
I'd be happy with either pyramid (and have kids in one of them, and this take does not match their experience).
Would avoid Langley, contrary to many.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robinson, Lake Braddock or Hayfield.
Robinson and Lake Braddock are both filled with thugs, vaping, and fights. No discipline, terrible administrators.
Wow.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Daniels Run - Katherine Johnson - Fairfax High School
This pyramid has a great sense of community, especially as a Fairfax City resident. Daniels Run is 99% city residents (as opposed to Providence Elementary, which has a larger percentage of county kids). The city is able to supplement some of the offerings, like having a STEAM lab and Spanish class in elementary school. And, since all city residents go to city schools, we never have to worry about redistricting and boundary changes.
Ha. Without Willow Springs and Powell ES families in the county propping up Johnson MS and Fairfax HS, it would be a bottom tier pyramid.
Anonymous wrote:Robinson, Lake Braddock or Hayfield.
Anonymous wrote:Daniels Run - Katherine Johnson - Fairfax High School
This pyramid has a great sense of community, especially as a Fairfax City resident. Daniels Run is 99% city residents (as opposed to Providence Elementary, which has a larger percentage of county kids). The city is able to supplement some of the offerings, like having a STEAM lab and Spanish class in elementary school. And, since all city residents go to city schools, we never have to worry about redistricting and boundary changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not seeing any of the college outcomes frankly being that different between the top five schools in FCPS.
There are more factors to choosing a high school than college admission results. I'm always amazed that people constantly reduce it to that and just that.
Yes, but these days you need to be thinking four or five steps ahead. Don’t pick the right preschool and you could be putting your child at a disadvantage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not seeing any of the college outcomes frankly being that different between the top five schools in FCPS.
There are more factors to choosing a high school than college admission results. I'm always amazed that people constantly reduce it to that and just that.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not seeing any of the college outcomes frankly being that different between the top five schools in FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.
But will they do well once they are there? Are they well prepared?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.
But will they do well once they are there? Are they well prepared?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.