Anonymous wrote:They were yelling "shame, shame, shame."

Actions have consequences: not a one of them will be re-electe

Which one of them has asked for a racial equity analysis of the program model? Nobody has done that yet or even uttered the word "race" yet they keep screeching equity

What have been decided yet?

So what is going on. Did they vote?

Hot mic moment!!! Montoya said “that’s the racism” to Wolff after Yang was the only one to vote no. She is absolutely right, but sad she didn’t wait to say it privatelt

They were yelling "shame, shame, shame."

Actions have consequences: not a one of them will be re-electe

Omg someone (Montoya?) just said “lots of racism” into a hot mic when the crowd clapped for Julie’s vote!

Julie is the only board member to vote against.

I’m surprised at Karla.

Good lord these leaders have zero empathy or respect for parents. You're gonna vote the way you are going vote, fine, but the dismissiveness is so gross

Anonymous wrote:Grace’s amendment passed. And it was unanimous. As I said, this whole this was orchestrated and rehearsed.

Its all for show.

Stewart is so ignorant! Her question about MA programs was too vague! She would have asked separate specific questions about the MSMC and Regional Magnets. Will 5 MS busses still come through my neighborhood everyday?!?

done

what was that lady yelling in the back before ms rivera-oven asked julie yang if she wanted to translate in chinese?

Grace’s amendment passed. And it was unanimous. As I said, this whole this was orchestrated and rehearsed.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder, does Wolff really not know how bad the regional program model is for equity? Or does she know and she's just BSing?

Have you followed her over the years? She has been overfocused and short-sighted. The particular equity to which you refer is a bother to her.

Short of a near-impossible write-in campaign, her hand-picked successor is running unopposed, so we all can look forward to more of the same...

Having MCPS report out on its own performance quarterly is not reassuring. They just massage the data to make themselves look good.

This would be more meaningful if the analyses was done by a third-party.