Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care
Uh no. Brittany makes tons of money and is not homeless. She does make weird and poor choices. That does not meet the standard for being placed in a conservatorship. People who cannot care for themselves and are living on the streets typically do meet the standard for conservatorship. In Virginia, the standard is “gravely disabled” and unable to provide for one’s basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Brittany plainly does not meet this standard.
you have zero way of knowing, based simply on insta posts, whether she meets the definition or not.
I am extremely confident that unable to have house herself or provide food or shelter would be evident from tabloids and/or social media.
Just because she has a roof over her head and food to eat doesn’t mean she doesn’t need a conservatorship. Stop enabling. Get real.
Anonymous wrote:I hope all the "Free Britney" people are happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care
Uh no. Brittany makes tons of money and is not homeless. She does make weird and poor choices. That does not meet the standard for being placed in a conservatorship. People who cannot care for themselves and are living on the streets typically do meet the standard for conservatorship. In Virginia, the standard is “gravely disabled” and unable to provide for one’s basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Brittany plainly does not meet this standard.
you have zero way of knowing, based simply on insta posts, whether she meets the definition or not.
I am extremely confident that unable to have house herself or provide food or shelter would be evident from tabloids and/or social media.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care
Uh no. Brittany makes tons of money and is not homeless. She does make weird and poor choices. That does not meet the standard for being placed in a conservatorship. People who cannot care for themselves and are living on the streets typically do meet the standard for conservatorship. In Virginia, the standard is “gravely disabled” and unable to provide for one’s basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Brittany plainly does not meet this standard.
you have zero way of knowing, based simply on insta posts, whether she meets the definition or not.
I am extremely confident that unable to have house herself or provide food or shelter would be evident from tabloids and/or social media.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did Lindsay Lohan manage to get things together? Can Britney follow her playbook?
I don't think Lohan was mentally ill (which is the real hurdle here). She just making bad choice and in the spot light too much. She moved to Dubai and completely disconnected from her celebrity for years.
In the UAE, Lohan discovered something she had never experienced as a global celebrity: anonymity in public spaces. Strict privacy norms and limited paparazzi presence allowed her to live largely unobserved — a freedom she describes as transformative.
“That’s a big breath of fresh air,” she has said of life in Dubai, “having to not overthink everything you do every second.”
https://www.voguearabia.com/article/why-lindsay-lohan-chose-dubai
This. Lohan isn’t mentally ill; she just had terrible parents and once she grew up and finally got away from them and the US she made better relationship and life choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care
Uh no. Brittany makes tons of money and is not homeless. She does make weird and poor choices. That does not meet the standard for being placed in a conservatorship. People who cannot care for themselves and are living on the streets typically do meet the standard for conservatorship. In Virginia, the standard is “gravely disabled” and unable to provide for one’s basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Brittany plainly does not meet this standard.
you have zero way of knowing, based simply on insta posts, whether she meets the definition or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care
Uh no. Brittany makes tons of money and is not homeless. She does make weird and poor choices. That does not meet the standard for being placed in a conservatorship. People who cannot care for themselves and are living on the streets typically do meet the standard for conservatorship. In Virginia, the standard is “gravely disabled” and unable to provide for one’s basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Brittany plainly does not meet this standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care
Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.
Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the conservatorship was flawed but it's clear she has mental health issues and needs some kind of monitoring.
Agree with this. I don't know if conservatorship is the right vehicle here. What she needed was some family members or a partner who were looking out for her best interests instead of using her to enrich themselves. I think the stability was not because of the conservatorship but the live-in boyfriend.
But she actually married that guy after the conservator ship was dissolved and things quickly went south. She needed someone making sure she received appropriate treatment for her mental illness to stay somewhat stable and he clearly wasn’t the one doing that.
She requires far more supervision and monitoring than being married. She is truly mentally ill and fortunate she isn't homeless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope all the "Free Britney" people are happy.
I truly don’t get this take. We can name countless celebs who’ve gotten DUIs. Also many celebrities who have flat out shot other people and are not in a conservatorship.
Kevin Federline a new drug addictand her father who literally drank himself to the point where he has had his leg amputated were both making money off of her conservativeship saying that she was too mentally ill to make decisions for herself but not mentally ill enough to stop performing and working? It made no sense.
Not one of those people cared about Britainy’s well-being. They just wanted the money train to keep rolling.
Sorry, I should say Kevin Federline is a known drug addict.
Not true whatsoever. One of my BFF has kids with his at school for years, he's definitely not a drug addict and reportedly a pretty good father. You can be a mega Britney superfan and hate KFed (for whatever parasocial reason you want) but you're just lying. Seriously.
Maybe in the last decade he cleaned up but when the kids were young, it is known that he was a huge pot smoker arguing that is just weird. It’s just a fact.
What he did with that conservatorship was so completely unethical. Defend him all you want, he’s a total loser and his book was a flop.
He also was not involved with the kids that he had prior to Britney because there was no money there.