Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.
The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.
The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.
The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.
Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.
Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?![]()
![]()
You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!
The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.
And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.
Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.
YOU called the PP an idiot first - did you somehow conveniently forget that? Piece of garbage, indeed.
DP
Your point? PP is an idiot. But that's not what makes them garbage. Defending a war crime is what makes them garbage. Apparently you are as well.
JFC, you people are insufferable.Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else ever get a totally surreal feeling about all of this? That human beings are actually capable of this kind of behavior? Let’s bomb a school full of children then people rush in to find bodies and survivors? I just can’t wrap my head around it…it’s devastating
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else ever get a totally surreal feeling about all of this? That human beings are actually capable of this kind of behavior? Let’s bomb a school full of children then people rush in to find bodies and survivors? I just can’t wrap my head around it…it’s devastating
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.
Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?![]()
![]()
You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!
The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.
And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.
Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.
YOU called the PP an idiot first - did you somehow conveniently forget that? Piece of garbage, indeed.
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.
Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?![]()
![]()
You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!
The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.
And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.
Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.
Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?![]()
![]()
You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!
The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.
And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.
Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.
Anonymous wrote:Totally sucks a munition went off target or strike package had wrong target.
Not the first time innocent people are killed in combat, won’t be the last.
Kinetic combat is super unfun for those involved or in proximity to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.
Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?![]()
![]()
You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!
The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.
And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.
Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?![]()
![]()
You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!
The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.
And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.