Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sort of had a similar situation. I was accepted into some fancy private schools but I had a full ride to UVA (I actually made money with scholarships). My parents said they’d give me 10k (this was 20 years ago) and a brand new car if I chose the flagship. I chose UVA and had an incredible college experience. I was able to use my inheritance from my grandpa on grad school.
Free is free and money is fungible. I would choose the free option again. I had a very nice down payment on my forever home at 27 due to it. Besides that, I loved the big school experience. It fit me very well.
OP is in almost the exact opposite situation: their kid, knowing it’s his own money, seemingly wants to conserve it; the point of paying would be to induce the kid to choose a less-preferred, more expensive university.
OP.
Not quite: kid prefers a few T20 privates over state flagship, but is reluctant to spend the $$$ (flagship likely free).
We (parents) have no preference—just want kid to be happy.
This is one of the interesting aspects of the situation: kid has a preference but has tentatively concluded that the preference is not worth the price (if kid is paying).
So is it worth it if we’re paying?
That’s why we’re leaning towards sharing the cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of this depends on which state flagship, and your financial situation.
If we're talking about the University of Alaska (google tells me this is the lowest ranked state flagship) vs Harvard for (insert something Alaska isn't good at. I don't actually know)? I think that's a different calculation than if your kid is thinking of Michigan vs. Northwestern for engineering.
The other thing is, are you talking about "right now, I am in a good position to retire at 60 with a high quality of living and lots of luxuries, and this will push that to 62" or "I already expected to need to work into my 70's to keep a roof over my head and feed myself"?
Good state flagship (think UW or UGA) vs potential T15.
Retire comfortably at 61-62 vs retire comfortably at 63-64.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sort of had a similar situation. I was accepted into some fancy private schools but I had a full ride to UVA (I actually made money with scholarships). My parents said they’d give me 10k (this was 20 years ago) and a brand new car if I chose the flagship. I chose UVA and had an incredible college experience. I was able to use my inheritance from my grandpa on grad school.
Free is free and money is fungible. I would choose the free option again. I had a very nice down payment on my forever home at 27 due to it. Besides that, I loved the big school experience. It fit me very well.
OP is in almost the exact opposite situation: their kid, knowing it’s his own money, seemingly wants to conserve it; the point of paying would be to induce the kid to choose a less-preferred, more expensive university.
OP.
Not quite: kid prefers a few T20 privates over state flagship, but is reluctant to spend the $$$ (flagship likely free).
We (parents) have no preference—just want kid to be happy.
This is one of the interesting aspects of the situation: kid has a preference but has tentatively concluded that the preference is not worth the price (if kid is paying).
So is it worth it if we’re paying?
That’s why we’re leaning towards sharing the cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sort of had a similar situation. I was accepted into some fancy private schools but I had a full ride to UVA (I actually made money with scholarships). My parents said they’d give me 10k (this was 20 years ago) and a brand new car if I chose the flagship. I chose UVA and had an incredible college experience. I was able to use my inheritance from my grandpa on grad school.
Free is free and money is fungible. I would choose the free option again. I had a very nice down payment on my forever home at 27 due to it. Besides that, I loved the big school experience. It fit me very well.
OP is in almost the exact opposite situation: their kid, knowing it’s his own money, seemingly wants to conserve it; the point of paying would be to induce the kid to choose a less-preferred, more expensive university.
OP.
Not quite: kid prefers a few T20 privates over state flagship, but is reluctant to spend the $$$ (flagship likely free).
We (parents) have no preference—just want kid to be happy.
This is one of the interesting aspects of the situation: kid has a preference but has tentatively concluded that the preference is not worth the price (if kid is paying).
So is it worth it if we’re paying?
That’s why we’re leaning towards sharing the cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he has $350k in a college fund, he should definitely look at other schools that he's more excited about. I don't understand why he wouldn't? Why save the money for an unknown grad school that they aren't even sure if they'll want to pursue? Cross the grad school funding when needed and use the $350 for the college that he wants
$350k is cash. So they can use that for future home or to start a biz, etc.
Plus $100k education only fund.
Plus $50k (adjusted for inflation) for life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So kid would rather use your money instead of theirs? Let them attend state flagship. They are smart, so should you.
OP here.
To be clear, kid not asking and has no expectations.
OTOH, if kid had *not* received this inheritance, we would certainly have offered to help them pay for college or grad school, wherever they decided to attend.
Does that change your answer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kid needs to get accepted first, they may not have a choice between state flagship and a T20 private.
There is this - it’s gotten impossibly competitive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kid needs to get accepted first, they may not have a choice between state flagship and a T20 private.
There is this - it’s gotten impossibly competitive[/quote
Of course. But they will likely ED/REA if they decide to pursue top 20, so they need to know financial situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sort of had a similar situation. I was accepted into some fancy private schools but I had a full ride to UVA (I actually made money with scholarships). My parents said they’d give me 10k (this was 20 years ago) and a brand new car if I chose the flagship. I chose UVA and had an incredible college experience. I was able to use my inheritance from my grandpa on grad school.
Free is free and money is fungible. I would choose the free option again. I had a very nice down payment on my forever home at 27 due to it. Besides that, I loved the big school experience. It fit me very well.
OP is in almost the exact opposite situation: their kid, knowing it’s his own money, seemingly wants to conserve it; the point of paying would be to induce the kid to choose a less-preferred, more expensive university.