Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.
We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.
Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.
There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.
We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.
Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.
There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.
Anonymous wrote:It’s bizarre that some of you think Andrew would even touch the sex issues. He was arrested for a completely different reason and there is no way he would voluntarily admit to any of the sexual abuse allegations - he’s denied them all along. So he’s obviously going to refuse to discuss or disclose anything related to that - to include implicating anyone else. If he’s denied it all along, he has to stick to his script. And that’s not at all why he was arrested.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.
What a joke we are here.
So true. I hope this arrest leads to testimony that damns trump. Even if our government wimps out, our children and grandchildren will know the truth.
I admire the British do much for this brave and just move.
Do you even understand why he was arrested??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.
Reported to Jeff for antisemitism.
Anonymous wrote:I love the King's response to this. So cold.
Anonymous wrote:At least Harry has the good sense to keep his mouth shut. Don’t get in the way of your adversary destroying themselves.
Anonymous wrote:SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!