Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Excluding CEO/President level (think VP, senior manager, manager types) at what point does a candidate's age start working against them?
Good question. It depends on the role and the company to be honest. I’ve been in old school industries (think commercial and retail banking) where people stay a looonnng time and someone who is say 45 is about the midpoint of the workforce distribution. I’ve also worked in digital marketing where the average age was like 30. And then in F500 the average age might be in the middle say 38, but by 50 the company is packaging people out.
I will say this
There is no reason to ever put more than 15 years of experience on your resume
There is no reason to put your college graduation date. (1982??!)
There is no reason to still be using Yahoo email. SMH
There is no reason to use Times Roman Font
— when I see a combination of these things on a resume I start thinking ‘This PERSON Has Aged Himself/Herself With This Resume - they are demonstrating by this document that they are not adaptable, will not change.
What is the best font to use? Or email? Is Gmail acceptable?
Also is it okay to put "xyz professional with over 15 years experience in xyz" in your headline or is that aging too?
Anonymous wrote:What would you advise someone who is more than 6 months unemployed, 45+, about breaking through to get interviews and land a job?
And for others...
What would you advise someone who is just out of college about breaking through to get interviews and land a job?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Excluding CEO/President level (think VP, senior manager, manager types) at what point does a candidate's age start working against them?
Good question. It depends on the role and the company to be honest. I’ve been in old school industries (think commercial and retail banking) where people stay a looonnng time and someone who is say 45 is about the midpoint of the workforce distribution. I’ve also worked in digital marketing where the average age was like 30. And then in F500 the average age might be in the middle say 38, but by 50 the company is packaging people out.
I will say this
There is no reason to ever put more than 15 years of experience on your resume
There is no reason to put your college graduation date. (1982??!)
There is no reason to still be using Yahoo email. SMH
There is no reason to use Times Roman Font
— when I see a combination of these things on a resume I start thinking ‘This PERSON Has Aged Himself/Herself With This Resume - they are demonstrating by this document that they are not adaptable, will not change.
What is the best font to use? Or email? Is Gmail acceptable?
Anonymous wrote:I haven’t had to look for a job since 1996.
My son is a smart, hardworking college student.
Based on what his relatives do and what he’s like, he will probably end up with an offbeat career at a small or midsize organization.
I told my son, “To get past the LinkedIn/Indeed wall, try meeting interesting people from interesting, small companies in person, and just send in resumes outside of a formal hiring process for a specific position.”
My son told me that he has been informed that, if he tries to send in resumes outside a formal hiring process, employers will blacklist him.
Is my son right about the blacklisting situation? Would all employers blacklist him for “just sending in a resume”?
If not: How can he figure out when it’s OK to send in a resume outside a formal hiring process and when it’s clearly a bad idea?
It sounds like age discrimination and devaluation of experience for you to disregard any work experience from more than 15 years ago.
Anonymous wrote:I haven’t had to look for a job since 1996.
My son is a smart, hardworking college student.
Based on what his relatives do and what he’s like, he will probably end up with an offbeat career at a small or midsize organization.
I told my son, “To get past the LinkedIn/Indeed wall, try meeting interesting people from interesting, small companies in person, and just send in resumes outside of a formal hiring process for a specific position.”
My son told me that he has been informed that, if he tries to send in resumes outside a formal hiring process, employers will blacklist him.
Is my son right about the blacklisting situation? Would all employers blacklist him for “just sending in a resume”?
If not: How can he figure out when it’s OK to send in a resume outside a formal hiring process and when it’s clearly a bad idea?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Excluding CEO/President level (think VP, senior manager, manager types) at what point does a candidate's age start working against them?
Good question. It depends on the role and the company to be honest. I’ve been in old school industries (think commercial and retail banking) where people stay a looonnng time and someone who is say 45 is about the midpoint of the workforce distribution. I’ve also worked in digital marketing where the average age was like 30. And then in F500 the average age might be in the middle say 38, but by 50 the company is packaging people out.
I will say this
There is no reason to ever put more than 15 years of experience on your resume
There is no reason to put your college graduation date. (1982??!)
There is no reason to still be using Yahoo email. SMH
There is no reason to use Times Roman Font
— when I see a combination of these things on a resume I start thinking ‘This PERSON Has Aged Himself/Herself With This Resume - they are demonstrating by this document that they are not adaptable, will not change.
People do send thank you’s. I think the interview slate (hiring manager and stakeholders) like them because by that time you are one of a handful of interviews.
Anonymous wrote:Do cover letters matter? Is it worth doing?
Do people still send thank you notes after an interview? Or is it annoying?
Does following up with the company ever make a difference?
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like age discrimination and devaluation of experience for you to disregard any work experience from more than 15 years ago.
I am not currently looking. But I have been caught up in corporate layoffs before.
I also recently got a new job in my company where the resume pool was about 200, the top 20 were reviewed, 3 internals and 1 external were interviewed. And I came in 2nd. I didn't get that job but another opening came up within a month and they tapped me. I felt bad for the external person because they were up against dozens of internals with relevant experience.
Inside my F500, with thousands of employees, every week-long posting tends to get 100s of internal applicants unless it's hyper-specific. And that's been true since at least the 2010s.
Anonymous wrote:This is great and thank you for the insight. Is there any advantage to applying directly to the company website vs going through indeed?
- A determined, F500 50 year old (with 15+ years of experience) trying to find something in this crazy landscape!
On a side note, I am a designer and a clean sans-serif font like Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, and Avenir are good choices and ensure ATS compatibility and easy screen reading for recruiters.