Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 4 people in their 30s/40s who have died of colon cancer. They should drop the screening age to 30.
I'm not actuary, but I bet that would result in a material increase in everyone's health insurance premiums.
Wouldn’t it be lower because it’s cheaper to treat cancer early?
No. The cost of 2-3 additional tests per person would dwarf any incremental benefits in treatment costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please get your colonoscopies! 45 with no family history, younger if you you have a history.
James got his. Feels like you are blaming him.
I don’t believe he got them as he should have:
- he was unaware that the screening age had dropped from 50 to 45
- he had changes in his bowel habits and attributed it to caffeine intake rather than speaking to a physician
What?
Who cares if he knew the screening age if he still got one at what turned out to be the recommended screening age?
People have changes in bowel habits for myriad reasons. I hope you don’t suggest that one go running to the doctor or for a colonoscopy as the first step every time? In addition to being impractical on a personal level, it’s impractical on a system level.
He was diagnosed at 46. He did not get screened at 45 and had publicly said he didn’t know screening was recommended at 45. I am suggesting people get tested when recommended and discuss changes in your status with your physician.
This is the medical equivalent of being pedantic.
It was 17 months after he turned 45 before he was screened AND he was not asymptomatic. Certain cancers cause things like oily or floating poop. This is not just caffeine makes me go. He had unexplained weightloss (another cancer indicator) and fatigue as well as abdominal pain.
So I completely disagree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please get your colonoscopies! 45 with no family history, younger if you you have a history.
James got his. Feels like you are blaming him.
I don’t believe he got them as he should have:
- he was unaware that the screening age had dropped from 50 to 45
- he had changes in his bowel habits and attributed it to caffeine intake rather than speaking to a physician
What?
Who cares if he knew the screening age if he still got one at what turned out to be the recommended screening age?
People have changes in bowel habits for myriad reasons. I hope you don’t suggest that one go running to the doctor or for a colonoscopy as the first step every time? In addition to being impractical on a personal level, it’s impractical on a system level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please get your colonoscopies! 45 with no family history, younger if you you have a history.
James got his. Feels like you are blaming him.
I don’t believe he got them as he should have:
- he was unaware that the screening age had dropped from 50 to 45
- he had changes in his bowel habits and attributed it to caffeine intake rather than speaking to a physician
What?
Who cares if he knew the screening age if he still got one at what turned out to be the recommended screening age?
People have changes in bowel habits for myriad reasons. I hope you don’t suggest that one go running to the doctor or for a colonoscopy as the first step every time? In addition to being impractical on a personal level, it’s impractical on a system level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please get your colonoscopies! 45 with no family history, younger if you you have a history.
James got his. Feels like you are blaming him.
I don’t believe he got them as he should have:
- he was unaware that the screening age had dropped from 50 to 45
- he had changes in his bowel habits and attributed it to caffeine intake rather than speaking to a physician
What?
Who cares if he knew the screening age if he still got one at what turned out to be the recommended screening age?
People have changes in bowel habits for myriad reasons. I hope you don’t suggest that one go running to the doctor or for a colonoscopy as the first step every time? In addition to being impractical on a personal level, it’s impractical on a system level.
He was diagnosed at 46. He did not get screened at 45 and had publicly said he didn’t know screening was recommended at 45. I am suggesting people get tested when recommended and discuss changes in your status with your physician.
This is the medical equivalent of being pedantic.
It was 17 months after he turned 45 before he was screened AND he was not asymptomatic. Certain cancers cause things like oily or floating poop. This is not just caffeine makes me go. He had unexplained weightloss (another cancer indicator) and fatigue as well as abdominal pain.
So I completely disagree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So sad for his six children and his wife.
Me too. It seems like Kimberly has never worked (at least since she married him). I hope he had good life insurance. Raising six kids and maintaining a big farm in Texas (or anywhere, really) must be incredibly expensive. I have a feeling they weren't in a good place financially since James was auctioning off memorabilia from his football movie.
Wife has already started a gofundme
Lol the rich persons go to. She can't work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So sad for his six children and his wife.
Me too. It seems like Kimberly has never worked (at least since she married him). I hope he had good life insurance. Raising six kids and maintaining a big farm in Texas (or anywhere, really) must be incredibly expensive. I have a feeling they weren't in a good place financially since James was auctioning off memorabilia from his football movie.
Wife has already started a gofundme
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Super sad. I'm 44 and not gen x but grew up when he was younger in dawson's creek. Didn't really watch his show either. But sad when someone dies so young with most of DCUM calling 40's "OLD". It's really not. Live life and get your colonoscopies. I have IBS since I was 30. Had my first colonoscopy 7 yrs ago. It was easier than I thought it would be the only scary part for me was being put under for it.
Np who is calling 40's old? Most people on here are probably older
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So sad for his six children and his wife.
Me too. It seems like Kimberly has never worked (at least since she married him). I hope he had good life insurance. Raising six kids and maintaining a big farm in Texas (or anywhere, really) must be incredibly expensive. I have a feeling they weren't in a good place financially since James was auctioning off memorabilia from his football movie.
Anonymous wrote:I hope he didn't wait . . .
[sorry, had to be said. I'm surprised no one beat me to it]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please get your colonoscopies! 45 with no family history, younger if you you have a history.
James got his. Feels like you are blaming him.
I don’t believe he got them as he should have:
- he was unaware that the screening age had dropped from 50 to 45
- he had changes in his bowel habits and attributed it to caffeine intake rather than speaking to a physician
What?
Who cares if he knew the screening age if he still got one at what turned out to be the recommended screening age?
People have changes in bowel habits for myriad reasons. I hope you don’t suggest that one go running to the doctor or for a colonoscopy as the first step every time? In addition to being impractical on a personal level, it’s impractical on a system level.
He was diagnosed at 46. He did not get screened at 45 and had publicly said he didn’t know screening was recommended at 45. I am suggesting people get tested when recommended and discuss changes in your status with your physician.
This is the medical equivalent of being pedantic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please get your colonoscopies! 45 with no family history, younger if you you have a history.
James got his. Feels like you are blaming him.
I don’t believe he got them as he should have:
- he was unaware that the screening age had dropped from 50 to 45
- he had changes in his bowel habits and attributed it to caffeine intake rather than speaking to a physician
What?
Who cares if he knew the screening age if he still got one at what turned out to be the recommended screening age?
People have changes in bowel habits for myriad reasons. I hope you don’t suggest that one go running to the doctor or for a colonoscopy as the first step every time? In addition to being impractical on a personal level, it’s impractical on a system level.
He was diagnosed at 46. He did not get screened at 45 and had publicly said he didn’t know screening was recommended at 45. I am suggesting people get tested when recommended and discuss changes in your status with your physician.
This is the medical equivalent of being pedantic.
Anonymous wrote:They are rising in Europe too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know why colon cancer rates are rising among young people? So scary.
only in America with their awful diets