Anonymous wrote:Its only a matter of time until they bust open your home looking for "contraband and prohibited materials" based on the database information they have from Palantir. They will put you on registries based on your political affiliation and news sources you read on the internet.

I asked the question when this started what are they going to do with property and assests seized in these raids? Cars, cash, cell phones, jewelry, homes, etc are being seized and sold. Is this where the $3,000 bonus for arrests(paid if the arrested is a US citizen or not) is coming from or are DHS, ICE and FBI agents running their own informal system of “bonuses” system? How long before they target people because they drive a nice car or own a nice house?

The Nazi Schutzstaffel (SS) began as Hitler's personal bodyguard, growing under Heinrich Himmler into Nazi Germany's primary security, terror, and intelligence agency, responsible for enforcing racial ideology, running concentration camps (Death's Head Units), and carrying out mass atrocities like the Holocaust, evolving into powerful forces like the combat-focused Waffen-SS alongside policing (Allgemeine SS) and intelligence (SD, Gestapo) branches, ultimately declared a criminal organization after WWII.

Anonymous wrote:Its only a matter of time until they bust open your home looking for "contraband and prohibited materials" based on the database information they have from Palantir. They will put you on registries based on your political affiliation and news sources you read on the internet.

yup

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only a few people have the memo, they only verbally tell ICE agents about it, and it is in direct violation of DHS policies and the 4th Amendment

They are ChiCom Big Government criminals.

Important correction to your title, PP. They didn’t say no more warrants; they said no judicial warrants. That means no warrant signed by a judge which is the gold standard. They would still need a warrant but it would be issued by ICE so would have lower standards presumably.

A judicial warrant isn’t the “gold standard.” It’s the constitution. An “administrative warrant” is just a piece of paper signed by a bureaucrat. It has no legal significance.

+1 An administrative warrant is from the executive branch telling ICE which is also part of the executive branch that something is permissible. The entire point of a judicial warrant is that another branch needs to weigh in. You know, checks and balances like most of us learned about in elementary school.

I'm not a lawyer but if this policy is allowed to stand, wouldn't the government be able to use it with citizens as well as non-citizens? I mean, if they open the door to allowing for the suspension of the practice of requiring a judicial warrant to enter someone's home, couldn't they suspend it for EVERYONE?

They are already using it on citizens. They did not even have an administrative warrant. This is republicans rule. Laws for everyone but not for me. Oh I forgot the same Biden did something, something.

Anonymous wrote:Its only a matter of time until they bust open your home looking for "contraband and prohibited materials" based on the database information they have from Palantir. They will put you on registries based on your political affiliation and news sources you read on the internet.

all part of the plan....Americans better wake up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only a few people have the memo, they only verbally tell ICE agents about it, and it is in direct violation of DHS policies and the 4th Amendment

They are ChiCom Big Government criminals.

Important correction to your title, PP. They didn’t say no more warrants; they said no judicial warrants. That means no warrant signed by a judge which is the gold standard. They would still need a warrant but it would be issued by ICE so would have lower standards presumably.

A judicial warrant isn’t the “gold standard.” It’s the constitution. An “administrative warrant” is just a piece of paper signed by a bureaucrat. It has no legal significance.

+1 An administrative warrant is from the executive branch telling ICE which is also part of the executive branch that something is permissible. The entire point of a judicial warrant is that another branch needs to weigh in. You know, checks and balances like most of us learned about in elementary school.

I'm not a lawyer but if this policy is allowed to stand, wouldn't the government be able to use it with citizens as well as non-citizens? I mean, if they open the door to allowing for the suspension of the practice of requiring a judicial warrant to enter someone's home, couldn't they suspend it for EVERYONE?

Yep.

YES. I am a lawyer, and yes. Those who feel ICE's actions do not affect them, will learn (and it will be too late by then) that all along these constitutional erosions are coming for YOU TOO. It's not going to be just immigrants, it's not to be just people with brown skin who are here lawfully but still being persecuted, this will ultimately be alllll of us, everyone, whose rights will be repressed in different ways.

It's not just brown people. White people need to understand that this is coming for them too. You might not be number one on the list, but that oft quoted poem is right. Don't wait to stand up until there's no one left to help defend you.

Anonymous wrote:Trump or Vance will pardon every effing DHS, TSA, ICE.

If they continue to make a mockery of legal justice, they shouldn't be surprised when street justice takes over. And little punks have already demonstrated that they don't have the stones for a real fight. They are bullies who will run away with their tails between their legs at the first sign of danger.

Its only a matter of time until they bust open your home looking for "contraband and prohibited materials" based on the database information they have from Palantir. They will put you on registries based on your political affiliation and news sources you read on the internet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only a few people have the memo, they only verbally tell ICE agents about it, and it is in direct violation of DHS policies and the 4th Amendment

They are ChiCom Big Government criminals.

Important correction to your title, PP. They didn’t say no more warrants; they said no judicial warrants. That means no warrant signed by a judge which is the gold standard. They would still need a warrant but it would be issued by ICE so would have lower standards presumably.

A judicial warrant isn’t the “gold standard.” It’s the constitution. An “administrative warrant” is just a piece of paper signed by a bureaucrat. It has no legal significance.

+1 An administrative warrant is from the executive branch telling ICE which is also part of the executive branch that something is permissible. The entire point of a judicial warrant is that another branch needs to weigh in. You know, checks and balances like most of us learned about in elementary school.

I'm not a lawyer but if this policy is allowed to stand, wouldn't the government be able to use it with citizens as well as non-citizens? I mean, if they open the door to allowing for the suspension of the practice of requiring a judicial warrant to enter someone's home, couldn't they suspend it for EVERYONE?

Yep.

YES. I am a lawyer, and yes. Those who feel ICE's actions do not affect them, will learn (and it will be too late by then) that all along these constitutional erosions are coming for YOU TOO. It's not going to be just immigrants, it's not to be just people with brown skin who are here lawfully but still being persecuted, this will ultimately be alllll of us, everyone, whose rights will be repressed in different ways.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only a few people have the memo, they only verbally tell ICE agents about it, and it is in direct violation of DHS policies and the 4th Amendment

They are ChiCom Big Government criminals.

Important correction to your title, PP. They didn’t say no more warrants; they said no judicial warrants. That means no warrant signed by a judge which is the gold standard. They would still need a warrant but it would be issued by ICE so would have lower standards presumably.

A judicial warrant isn’t the “gold standard.” It’s the constitution. An “administrative warrant” is just a piece of paper signed by a bureaucrat. It has no legal significance.

+1 An administrative warrant is from the executive branch telling ICE which is also part of the executive branch that something is permissible. The entire point of a judicial warrant is that another branch needs to weigh in. You know, checks and balances like most of us learned about in elementary school.

I'm not a lawyer but if this policy is allowed to stand, wouldn't the government be able to use it with citizens as well as non-citizens? I mean, if they open the door to allowing for the suspension of the practice of requiring a judicial warrant to enter someone's home, couldn't they suspend it for EVERYONE?

Yep.

Anonymous wrote:Trump or Vance will pardon every effing DHS, TSA, ICE.

Not of state charges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only a few people have the memo, they only verbally tell ICE agents about it, and it is in direct violation of DHS policies and the 4th Amendment

They are ChiCom Big Government criminals.

Important correction to your title, PP. They didn’t say no more warrants; they said no judicial warrants. That means no warrant signed by a judge which is the gold standard. They would still need a warrant but it would be issued by ICE so would have lower standards presumably.

A judicial warrant isn’t the “gold standard.” It’s the constitution. An “administrative warrant” is just a piece of paper signed by a bureaucrat. It has no legal significance.

+1 An administrative warrant is from the executive branch telling ICE which is also part of the executive branch that something is permissible. The entire point of a judicial warrant is that another branch needs to weigh in. You know, checks and balances like most of us learned about in elementary school.

I'm not a lawyer but if this policy is allowed to stand, wouldn't the government be able to use it with citizens as well as non-citizens? I mean, if they open the door to allowing for the suspension of the practice of requiring a judicial warrant to enter someone's home, couldn't they suspend it for EVERYONE?

Anonymous wrote:Hey Don't Tread On Me crowd, where you at? You were crying about wearing a mask to not kill grandma. Where are you now, tough guys?

They are crying about something else....loving all this because they are full of hatred and racism.

Anonymous wrote:MAGA is so dumb

and disgusting

Trump or Vance will pardon every effing DHS, TSA, ICE.