Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You didn’t miss it. It’s startling how little attention this is getting. Perhaps it doesn’t fit the leftist worldview that islamist extremism is a heroic movement of anti colonialism and simply a natural act of the oppressed. /s

I remain hopeful for the people of Iran but the apathy of so many supposedly freedom loving Americans, particularly left leaning, is jolting.

Bc they can’t hate on Jews or Israel - silence.

Classic dcum

DP

Ugh - don’t you ever tire of playing this victim card, this “everyone hates Jews!” mass conspiracy nonsense?

No more than tiring of the "Israel is the root of all evil" card the pro-Palestinian here keeps throwing down in every possible thread, no matter how unrelated.

Let's agree that Palestinians represent a failed terror regime bent on genocide against the Jews, and we can find common ground from which to proceed.

No one is stupid enough to fall for your satirical Hasbra. Stop embarrassing yourself and other Zionists.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

Iran has been hostile to American from day one of this regime in 1979 and has done nothing since to advance any kind of reconciliation or alliance with the US.

This theocratic regime has been oppressive and authoritarian and has horribly mismanaged Iran. They can go and maybe THEN we can become friends with its new government.

You really don't know what the US did to the Iranian people pre-1979, to cause the revolution do you. If only the USA had been a fair player, even now we still don't know how to play fair and have failed to learn the lesson. Yes, the people hate this regime, but do you really think they once they are deposed, and they eventually will be, that the Iranian people want to go back to pre-1979 under the thumb of an American imposed dictator who disappeared people

Nobody here said Iran was perfect under the Shah. Yes, it was authoritarian, and yes, they had SAVAK repress certain groups, such as marxists, islamists, and dissidents, however most Persians enjoyed quite a bit of freedom otherwise. But here's the thing - authoritarianism, repression and oppression and human rights abuses got FAR WORSE under the Ayatollahs. The Shah was not a good person. But ironically right now, the loudest voices within Iran rising up and calling for change are pro-Pahlavi so even that's recognized as being better than the current status quo. Bringing a sha back would not be ideal, but perhaps the opportunity would be a democratic, constitutional monarchy similar to the UK. Also not perfect, but at least a step in a better direction from where Iran is now.

Let them figure it out. Every time the UK or USA got involved it only made things worse for the ordinary Iranian. It's not like we don't have a lot of mess going on over here in our politics. Half the country wants to get rid of the other half, but we want to control the people half way around the world. No, just no.

"Letting them figure it out" is what gave us the Ayatollahs and their repression. And more broadly across the middle east, one crazy islamist terror group after another. And one corrupt, repressive regime after another. And most of the world's worst human rights abuses. And, continued modern-day slavery. I think maybe the ones allowed to do the figuring out need to be vetted for sanity and decency.

Sounds like zionist gibberish here. Maybe go read a book and learn how the US overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran to better understand the events leading to the rise of the Ayatollah.

WRONG. I can't stand Netanyahu and his Zionist agenda but even I can see how many middle eastern regimes have completely failed at modern governance.

Are you seriously that dense?

Here, let me TRY to make this easy for you with an simple question …

What country in the region has gained the most through those many failures?

Name some countries in the Middle East that have a stable government of the people, little corruption, and no human rights abuses.

And what has been "gained" by the governance failures of Yemen, Libya, etc? Do you seriously think Israel or the US are somehow benefiting from those countries being a total mess? Those messes create geopolitical security risks.

I didn’t say that the agenda was a smart, sensible one. The geopolitical agenda of Israel (and of the U.S., sadly, by extension) is idiotic, which is why that “total mess” comes as hardly a surprise to those paying attention but without the diseased scourge of Zionism raving through our bloodstream.

So you failed to show anyone having something to gain. You failed to show solid examples of successful self-governance. You failed in your quest to dismiss any legitimate criticism or statements about history as "zionist gibberish." So why are you still here flailing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

I really can’t tell if this is supposed to be sarcastic.

DP. Is Iran involved in a genocide? Did Iran steal land to create a country that never existed? If the US had to choose between Israel or Iran as an ally you would take Iran in 10 out of 10 times.

Yes Iran has been involved in a genocide all while chanting Death to America and supporting terrorists who kill Americans.

Are people this ignorant or people genuinely would support Iran? Why do so many liberals support fundamentalists who kill gay men, support terrorism, and think it is acceptable to beat and subjugate women?

That's the million-dollar question and one that is never, ever addressed or answered.
DP

Because Iran, like the pro-Palestinian on here who posts interminably, support Palestinian terror as a proxy for the annihilation of Israel, the overarching goal. Nothing else matters to them, no conduct is too evil or obscene if in service of that objective. That, of course, is just the first step towards global Islam, spread by force.

Substitute a few words and you're literally talking about Zionism and the destruction of the middle east. Last I checked, it wasn't Iran attacking 8 different countries and their civilian population in the span of a year.

Iran attacks using proxies, Israel defends itself against those attacking it. You apparently are incapable of distinguishing between offense and defense, as it typical of pro-Palestinian apologists who are compelled to claim that every offensive terror action is really "defense" against a country which was attacked by Palestinians and others from the moment it came into existence and ever after.

Says the mouth breather defending the pariah nation that coined and exclusively uses the laughable “preemptive self-defense” excuse at every turn …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

I really can’t tell if this is supposed to be sarcastic.

DP. Is Iran involved in a genocide? Did Iran steal land to create a country that never existed? If the US had to choose between Israel or Iran as an ally you would take Iran in 10 out of 10 times.

Yes Iran has been involved in a genocide all while chanting Death to America and supporting terrorists who kill Americans.

Are people this ignorant or people genuinely would support Iran? Why do so many liberals support fundamentalists who kill gay men, support terrorism, and think it is acceptable to beat and subjugate women?

That's the million-dollar question and one that is never, ever addressed or answered.
DP

Because Iran, like the pro-Palestinian on here who posts interminably, support Palestinian terror as a proxy for the annihilation of Israel, the overarching goal. Nothing else matters to them, no conduct is too evil or obscene if in service of that objective. That, of course, is just the first step towards global Islam, spread by force.

Substitute a few words and you're literally talking about Zionism and the destruction of the middle east. Last I checked, it wasn't Iran attacking 8 different countries and their civilian population in the span of a year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free Iran!! Down with the IRGC!

And up with... whom?

A 20 year military occupation by American young me?

They have an interim leader waiting. Part of the last royal family.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

Iran has been hostile to American from day one of this regime in 1979 and has done nothing since to advance any kind of reconciliation or alliance with the US.

This theocratic regime has been oppressive and authoritarian and has horribly mismanaged Iran. They can go and maybe THEN we can become friends with its new government.

You really don't know what the US did to the Iranian people pre-1979, to cause the revolution do you. If only the USA had been a fair player, even now we still don't know how to play fair and have failed to learn the lesson. Yes, the people hate this regime, but do you really think they once they are deposed, and they eventually will be, that the Iranian people want to go back to pre-1979 under the thumb of an American imposed dictator who disappeared people

Nobody here said Iran was perfect under the Shah. Yes, it was authoritarian, and yes, they had SAVAK repress certain groups, such as marxists, islamists, and dissidents, however most Persians enjoyed quite a bit of freedom otherwise. But here's the thing - authoritarianism, repression and oppression and human rights abuses got FAR WORSE under the Ayatollahs. The Shah was not a good person. But ironically right now, the loudest voices within Iran rising up and calling for change are pro-Pahlavi so even that's recognized as being better than the current status quo. Bringing a sha back would not be ideal, but perhaps the opportunity would be a democratic, constitutional monarchy similar to the UK. Also not perfect, but at least a step in a better direction from where Iran is now.

Let them figure it out. Every time the UK or USA got involved it only made things worse for the ordinary Iranian. It's not like we don't have a lot of mess going on over here in our politics. Half the country wants to get rid of the other half, but we want to control the people half way around the world. No, just no.

"Letting them figure it out" is what gave us the Ayatollahs and their repression. And more broadly across the middle east, one crazy islamist terror group after another. And one corrupt, repressive regime after another. And most of the world's worst human rights abuses. And, continued modern-day slavery. I think maybe the ones allowed to do the figuring out need to be vetted for sanity and decency.

Sounds like zionist gibberish here. Maybe go read a book and learn how the US overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran to better understand the events leading to the rise of the Ayatollah.

WRONG. I can't stand Netanyahu and his Zionist agenda but even I can see how many middle eastern regimes have completely failed at modern governance.

Are you seriously that dense?

Here, let me TRY to make this easy for you with an simple question …

What country in the region has gained the most through those many failures?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

Iran has been hostile to American from day one of this regime in 1979 and has done nothing since to advance any kind of reconciliation or alliance with the US.

This theocratic regime has been oppressive and authoritarian and has horribly mismanaged Iran. They can go and maybe THEN we can become friends with its new government.

You really don't know what the US did to the Iranian people pre-1979, to cause the revolution do you. If only the USA had been a fair player, even now we still don't know how to play fair and have failed to learn the lesson. Yes, the people hate this regime, but do you really think they once they are deposed, and they eventually will be, that the Iranian people want to go back to pre-1979 under the thumb of an American imposed dictator who disappeared people

Nobody here said Iran was perfect under the Shah. Yes, it was authoritarian, and yes, they had SAVAK repress certain groups, such as marxists, islamists, and dissidents, however most Persians enjoyed quite a bit of freedom otherwise. But here's the thing - authoritarianism, repression and oppression and human rights abuses got FAR WORSE under the Ayatollahs. The Shah was not a good person. But ironically right now, the loudest voices within Iran rising up and calling for change are pro-Pahlavi so even that's recognized as being better than the current status quo. Bringing a sha back would not be ideal, but perhaps the opportunity would be a democratic, constitutional monarchy similar to the UK. Also not perfect, but at least a step in a better direction from where Iran is now.

Let them figure it out. Every time the UK or USA got involved it only made things worse for the ordinary Iranian. It's not like we don't have a lot of mess going on over here in our politics. Half the country wants to get rid of the other half, but we want to control the people half way around the world. No, just no.

"Letting them figure it out" is what gave us the Ayatollahs and their repression. And more broadly across the middle east, one crazy islamist terror group after another. And one corrupt, repressive regime after another. And most of the world's worst human rights abuses. And, continued modern-day slavery. I think maybe the ones allowed to do the figuring out need to be vetted for sanity and decency.

Sounds like zionist gibberish here. Maybe go read a book and learn how the US overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran to better understand the events leading to the rise of the Ayatollah.

WRONG. I can't stand Netanyahu and his Zionist agenda but even I can see how many middle eastern regimes have completely failed at modern governance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

Iran has been hostile to American from day one of this regime in 1979 and has done nothing since to advance any kind of reconciliation or alliance with the US.

This theocratic regime has been oppressive and authoritarian and has horribly mismanaged Iran. They can go and maybe THEN we can become friends with its new government.

You really don't know what the US did to the Iranian people pre-1979, to cause the revolution do you. If only the USA had been a fair player, even now we still don't know how to play fair and have failed to learn the lesson. Yes, the people hate this regime, but do you really think they once they are deposed, and they eventually will be, that the Iranian people want to go back to pre-1979 under the thumb of an American imposed dictator who disappeared people

Nobody here said Iran was perfect under the Shah. Yes, it was authoritarian, and yes, they had SAVAK repress certain groups, such as marxists, islamists, and dissidents, however most Persians enjoyed quite a bit of freedom otherwise. But here's the thing - authoritarianism, repression and oppression and human rights abuses got FAR WORSE under the Ayatollahs. The Shah was not a good person. But ironically right now, the loudest voices within Iran rising up and calling for change are pro-Pahlavi so even that's recognized as being better than the current status quo. Bringing a sha back would not be ideal, but perhaps the opportunity would be a democratic, constitutional monarchy similar to the UK. Also not perfect, but at least a step in a better direction from where Iran is now.

Let them figure it out. Every time the UK or USA got involved it only made things worse for the ordinary Iranian. It's not like we don't have a lot of mess going on over here in our politics. Half the country wants to get rid of the other half, but we want to control the people half way around the world. No, just no.

"Letting them figure it out" is what gave us the Ayatollahs and their repression. And more broadly across the middle east, one crazy islamist terror group after another. And one corrupt, repressive regime after another. And most of the world's worst human rights abuses. And, continued modern-day slavery. I think maybe the ones allowed to do the figuring out need to be vetted for sanity and decency.

Sounds like zionist gibberish here. Maybe go read a book and learn how the US overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran to better understand the events leading to the rise of the Ayatollah.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

I really can’t tell if this is supposed to be sarcastic.

DP. Is Iran involved in a genocide? Did Iran steal land to create a country that never existed? If the US had to choose between Israel or Iran as an ally you would take Iran in 10 out of 10 times.

Yes Iran has been involved in a genocide all while chanting Death to America and supporting terrorists who kill Americans.

Are people this ignorant or people genuinely would support Iran? Why do so many liberals support fundamentalists who kill gay men, support terrorism, and think it is acceptable to beat and subjugate women?

That's the million-dollar question and one that is never, ever addressed or answered.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

I really can’t tell if this is supposed to be sarcastic.

DP. Is Iran involved in a genocide? Did Iran steal land to create a country that never existed? If the US had to choose between Israel or Iran as an ally you would take Iran in 10 out of 10 times.

Yes Iran has been involved in a genocide all while chanting Death to America and supporting terrorists who kill Americans.

Are people this ignorant or people genuinely would support Iran? Why do so many liberals support fundamentalists who kill gay men, support terrorism, and think it is acceptable to beat and subjugate women?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You didn’t miss it. It’s startling how little attention this is getting. Perhaps it doesn’t fit the leftist worldview that islamist extremism is a heroic movement of anti colonialism and simply a natural act of the oppressed. /s

I remain hopeful for the people of Iran but the apathy of so many supposedly freedom loving Americans, particularly left leaning, is jolting.

Sweetie what are you blabbering about exactly. It’s being reported in the New York Times, BbC, CNN, MSNBC, Reuters, The Atlantic, Al Jazeera, WSJ, NPR, and other outlets. Maybe you should broaden your horizons when following the news.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is just a casualty of Israel’s dominance of US politics. The US should be allied with Iran. Iran is a real country, located in an important strategic location and has oil.

The differences between Israel and Iran theocracies are the Israeli racism, oppression and genocide.

I really can’t tell if this is supposed to be sarcastic.

Sadly no. She is completely serious and knows nothing about how Iran is the country causing conflicts in the region and training, funding and giving a go to Hamas to execute October 07. Utter delusional moron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free Iran!! Down with the IRGC!

And up with... whom?

A 20 year military occupation by American young me?