Anonymous wrote:Dear God let this be a troll post
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the breakdown in scores? Nearly all schools super score, so if the scores are very lopsided (nearly 800 in one section), just focus entirely on the other section.
770 in Math, 670 in English
So, stop studying Math and focus entirely on English. It literally doesn’t matter if after the next test, she score a 770 in English and a 500 in math…she will tell colleges she scored a 1540.
Good luck, sincerely to the OP and their DC, but it’s nauseating that super scoring even exists. The fundamental unfairness of viewing one kid with a one-and-done 1600 the same as another kid who took six SAT administrations to cobble together a Frankenstein’d 1600 via super scoring … it’s ridiculous.
Annual petition to limit re-takes to one for valid medical reason with no super scoring …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the breakdown in scores? Nearly all schools super score, so if the scores are very lopsided (nearly 800 in one section), just focus entirely on the other section.
770 in Math, 670 in English
So, stop studying Math and focus entirely on English. It literally doesn’t matter if after the next test, she score a 770 in English and a 500 in math…she will tell colleges she scored a 1540.
Good luck, sincerely to the OP and their DC, but it’s nauseating that super scoring even exists. The fundamental unfairness of viewing one kid with a one-and-done 1600 the same as another kid who took six SAT administrations to cobble together a Frankenstein’d 1600 via super scoring … it’s ridiculous.
Annual petition to limit re-takes to one for valid medical reason with no super scoring …
Anonymous wrote:I find it curious that people think the verbal section of the SAT is hard to prep. My DC is not reader at all. Hates it. Reads books for AP English classes and is an excellent writer, but nothing for pleasure since about age 10. I’m not kidding. It is upsetting as a parent that reads all the time and I read to him nightly even through 8th grade (!) when I would read chapter books each night! He scored a perfect score on English and Reading section of the ACt (36s). It was shocking. 35 on the test overall not superscored. OP, maybe try the ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the breakdown in scores? Nearly all schools super score, so if the scores are very lopsided (nearly 800 in one section), just focus entirely on the other section.
770 in Math, 670 in English
So, stop studying Math and focus entirely on English. It literally doesn’t matter if after the next test, she score a 770 in English and a 500 in math…she will tell colleges she scored a 1540.
Good luck, sincerely to the OP and their DC, but it’s nauseating that super scoring even exists. The fundamental unfairness of viewing one kid with a one-and-done 1600 the same as another kid who took six SAT administrations to cobble together a Frankenstein’d 1600 via super scoring … it’s ridiculous.
Annual petition to limit re-takes to one for valid medical reason with no super scoring …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the breakdown in scores? Nearly all schools super score, so if the scores are very lopsided (nearly 800 in one section), just focus entirely on the other section.
770 in Math, 670 in English
So, stop studying Math and focus entirely on English. It literally doesn’t matter if after the next test, she score a 770 in English and a 500 in math…she will tell colleges she scored a 1540.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The blue book practice tests are skewing high right now especially beyond 1450. This is my experience. So a kid who averages 1580 is getting 1530 at most. I think the digital SAT has had some issues in its infancy. Too many high scores. That’s been remedied as of maybe March? but the practice tests still reflect that beginning.
I agree with this. My kid scores higher on blue book practice tests than on the actual exam (taken twice). I chalk it up to differences in scaling after the psat disaster (the psat scores were way too high, which meant that NMSQT required near perfect scores).
Anonymous wrote:The blue book practice tests are skewing high right now especially beyond 1450. This is my experience. So a kid who averages 1580 is getting 1530 at most. I think the digital SAT has had some issues in its infancy. Too many high scores. That’s been remedied as of maybe March? but the practice tests still reflect that beginning.
Anonymous wrote:I find it curious that people think the verbal section of the SAT is hard to prep. My DC is not reader at all. Hates it. Reads books for AP English classes and is an excellent writer, but nothing for pleasure since about age 10. I’m not kidding. It is upsetting as a parent that reads all the time and I read to him nightly even through 8th grade (!) when I would read chapter books each night! He scored a perfect score on English and Reading section of the ACt (36s). It was shocking. 35 on the test overall not superscored. OP, maybe try the ACT.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter is an excellent student taking on the most rigorous classes offered at her DMV private . As a junior, she’s already in AP Calculus BC and AP Lang and excelling in both. Based on the honors list numbers at her school , she’s around the top 10-15% of her class. She took 3 AP classes as a sophomore and scored 5’s on all three.
Here’s the issue: she just can’t seem to do well on the SAT in spite of studying hard for it and having excellent tutors.
She scored a 1460 on the first benchmark blue book practice test with zero prep back in June , so we thought it would be easy to get past the 1500 with some tutoring.
Fast forward 6 months, some 20 tutoring sessions, hours of studying on her own and her December SAT came in at 1440.
Kids at her school who are around her level have mostly scored 1530+.
Granted a 1440 is somewhere around the 96 percentile but it’s not even in the ball park of the schools she was hoping to apply for next year.
She’ll retake the test in the Spring but we are just perplexed at why this is happening. We are also doubtful that her score will go up much in the next 3 months if it hasn’t budged in the last 6 months. How can a student who is clearly capable, prepped so much, not be able to do well on the test?
Has anyone had this experience with their child before ? Would love to hear your thoughts.
No mean comments please.
TIA