Anonymous wrote:No Scoir data on JHU so don't know if it's an option or not. USC is already on the list (EA). Would be v happy at USC. Not sure about WashU - didn't like location. Emory is a possibility. Thanks for the advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - they want a college with strong English/humanities program. Pref. near a larger city (Cornell the exception). Probably no southern schools. Possibly want to do pre-med also. Need flexibility on major. Thought that with Cornell going test required, that would help having a good SAT score.
Cornell is not the right school for English/premed. Most of the Cornell premed are housed in CALS, not CAS.
JHU would be a perfect fit, but it's a long, long shot.
WashU Emory are possible options, but ED2 and RD get a lot more difficult.
For RD I would consider USC, they still take a lot from the RD round. Decent premed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the GPA is low(er)? They are only top 30 percent? Did the counselor advise ED to Cornell?? That seems really odd and a waste of ED. You have to go down the ranks like Tufts BC EDII. Add U Rochester Case Western Pitt to the RD rounds.
I kind of agree with this. The "40% to top 30 schools" is probably WAY inflated by hooked kids.
If Cornell was a denial then I would do something similar ED2 (WashU, Emory, Tufts) and then make sure you go to Rochester, CWRU, in RD.
In my experience with a decent but not top 10% kid from a "top private" who got deferred from a lesser Ivy last year---RD was pretty bad for top30s. They got into 2 of 20+ schools in the top35. A lot of deferrals and denials.
You don't want to get shut out. Maybe sure they have a lot of matches and safeties in RD and I would definitely ED2. My kid did not and we regretted it.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - they want a college with strong English/humanities program. Pref. near a larger city (Cornell the exception). Probably no southern schools. Possibly want to do pre-med also. Need flexibility on major. Thought that with Cornell going test required, that would help having a good SAT score.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - they want a college with strong English/humanities program. Pref. near a larger city (Cornell the exception). Probably no southern schools. Possibly want to do pre-med also. Need flexibility on major. Thought that with Cornell going test required, that would help having a good SAT score.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for the responses. They have a couple of safeties in the bag already. Waiting on some EA's in January. Our school does not have that many athletes (usually 2 or 3). Legacies possibly a few more.
Kid wants medium sized, not Liberal Arts type school (didn't like Amherst, etc.) Did like Emory, but not sure about ED there.
Has 4.3 weighted and all 5's on APs from junior year. That puts them in top 30% of class. Small school with about 90 graduating each year. I think JHU will be a long shot (don't they want top 10% of class?)
At a school that size, class rank seems like relevant as a few kids can drop you a long way. My child goes to a similar sized school and I think the school conveys a general sense of things but no real rank as it is useless. Though most schools that size these days also don't do APs.
Unrelatedly, I agree with others that ED2 is evil. The process is already difficult enough. It just further complicates things. The only kids it benefits are those who have two top choice schools. They get rejected ED by their top, so they can apply ED2 to their second choice. It feels a lot like settling. The kids I feel worst for are those who are deferred ED and thus have to decide whether they think they will get in or should go ED2 elsewhere, rather than being able to wait and see how everything shakes out.
The obsession with managing yield has really made this process awful as they are all looking for creative ways to game the system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cornell is weird this year. It used to take a large number ED from our school. This year they took zero. Even legacies got deferred. I almost think they may have a different admissions policy this year.
ED rounds were awful at Ivies/T-10s this year.
Brutal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe ED2 is predatory, if not a scam. Limited selection of schools and acceptance rates are not much higher than RD.
Do they have a balanced list of schools for RD? I would definitely reach out to your school counselor for advice on RD list/strategy.
I don’t understand what’s predatory about it. What’s the downside?
If the school is genuinely is your kid’s top remaining choice, what’s the harm in checking the ED2 box? If you get deferred, you’re no worse off than if you just kept it RD. And if you get denied, you know sooner rather than later and can pivot away mentally.
If the school is not your kid’s top remaining choice, it’s up to you whether and how you want to play the odds. Drop down to a safer choice ED2? Take a shot at a higher school, knowing the odds are low? Or stick with RD across the board?
You have options, and it’s a completely personal choice, 100% in your control. Nothing predatory about that, IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Understand that all of these schools are single digit admit rates and in ED, they are taking their athletes and legacies. An unhooked kid should not be applying to Cornell ED and your college guidance should have told you that (ask me how I know, LOL...BTDT)
This advice is not quite correct.
My unhooked, public school kid got in Cornell ED for engineering. No legacy, non-athlete. No national awards.
DP: but let me guess, your DC was ranked higher than top 30%? No way an unhooked 30% ranked kids get into T10 engineering from any public HS, not even TJ
Correct, not top 30%. School is unranked, but I'd say top 5% in terms of rigor/GPA.