Anonymous wrote:My guess is that the two day delay allowed families a moment to consider withdrawing or converting their ED applications. That seems fair. I doubt many did but maybe a couple.
Anonymous wrote:“Brown’s application includes a question about the open curriculum and how the applicant would take advantage of it. If the student can answer this question compellingly, they’re a good candidate for Brown. If they can’t, they aren’t.“
I absolutely believe this was key to my kid getting in ED. (From FCPS)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 from Jackson-Reed. Not a recruited athlete.
Congrats! What gpa ecs gender etc?
Hope no one answers this. Let’s give this student some privacy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious, I hear a lot about aacepted students with interdisciplinary interests who want to use Brown's flexibility to take an eclectic set of courses, but I've never heard of a student whose answer to "why open curriculum" was "so I can singularly focus on my STEM interests, UK-style". Does anyone know of a student who was accepted with that angle? From reading brown's page it seems that they want the former type of student, not the latter.
Brown’s application includes a question about the open curriculum and how the applicant would take advantage of it. If the student can answer this question compellingly, they’re a good candidate for Brown. If they can’t, they aren’t.
But does "take more/graduate level courses in my STEM interests" count as a compelling answer?
Anonymous wrote:So here we have people from a “California private” posting that a kid there got into Brown. And this is helpful to a DMV forum, how?
What is the point of a thread like this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 from Jackson-Reed. Not a recruited athlete.
Congrats! What gpa ecs gender etc?
Anonymous wrote:1 from Jackson-Reed. Not a recruited athlete.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes 1 girl from Holton Arms
Legacy or athlete ?
She’s an athlete.
2 girls from Holton Arms. Not recruited athletes.
Happy to hear! My daughter was a recruited athlete to HYP from Holton several years ago. At that time, the only Holton girls who got into Brown, Dartmouth and Cornell were either VIP legacies or high performing black students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious, I hear a lot about aacepted students with interdisciplinary interests who want to use Brown's flexibility to take an eclectic set of courses, but I've never heard of a student whose answer to "why open curriculum" was "so I can singularly focus on my STEM interests, UK-style". Does anyone know of a student who was accepted with that angle? From reading brown's page it seems that they want the former type of student, not the latter.
Brown’s application includes a question about the open curriculum and how the applicant would take advantage of it. If the student can answer this question compellingly, they’re a good candidate for Brown. If they can’t, they aren’t.
So this is slightly different, but I'm a Brown grad (though 30 years ago) - I studied International Relations. Because of the open curriculum, I didn't take any math or science classes (other than Economics, which was required for Int'l Relations) during my 4 years. It opened up spots in my courseload for courses across the Int'l Relations spectrum, which is quite diverse. So, not STEM, which is what you originally asked about, but it's sort of the same idea of singularly focusing on an area. I loved Brown and the curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious, I hear a lot about aacepted students with interdisciplinary interests who want to use Brown's flexibility to take an eclectic set of courses, but I've never heard of a student whose answer to "why open curriculum" was "so I can singularly focus on my STEM interests, UK-style". Does anyone know of a student who was accepted with that angle? From reading brown's page it seems that they want the former type of student, not the latter.
Brown’s application includes a question about the open curriculum and how the applicant would take advantage of it. If the student can answer this question compellingly, they’re a good candidate for Brown. If they can’t, they aren’t.