Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reducing elementary class sizes by 1
Reducing elementary class sizes is a good goal, but reducing them by one will have a negligible impact on classrooms. I'd want to see reductions of class size by 3-5 before I clap for Taylor.
So by what amounts to another class? Where are these other classes going to be placed in schools?
If it's reducing class sizes by one, it just means going back to the guidelines in place a couple years ago before they raised them by 1.
With declining enrollment, maybe this is just natural attrition in student numbers than any intentional action by MCPS.
Class size is not the same as absolute size. A school can lose 100 kids and class sizes still stay the same. They just hire fewer teachers. The number of teachers they hire is based on the number of kids they have, and they are talking about adjusting this formula.
Not sure what you mean. If the number of kids at a school drops, but the number of classroom teachers stays the same, the average class size will drop. That doesn't mean all class sizes at that school will drop, but you'd expect that trend over time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taylor wants an increase. Where is this money going? How about transparency!
Have you even bothered to look at the details? Almost all
of the increase simply goes to pay and benefits.
That's just part of the money, what about the rest of the money. MCPS has a huge budget and it should be in this kind of mess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any written information provided on the budget yet or just this meeting?
I think it should go up here but hasn't been posted yet: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/budget/
The one page summary has been posted: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GJKuduRVabGklonUKc2u7VmIcBsrbNW/view?usp=drivesdk
Thank you. 50 people from central services is a lot. Did they clarify what jobs will be cut?
That will hopefully be clearer when the full details are out. Based on other posters it seems like a lot will be from special ed and the social workers, which is concerning as he stated in his presentation that the cuts were to get rid of positions they didn't see as a "priority." Mental health, family support and special education seem to be pretty important! Even when you consider his own slide of what MCPS wants to focus on. And I believe special ed enrollment is increasing, so why limit its support? It's a clever trick to call any non-school based staff "central services" when many are clearly in the schools often, or are benefiting schools directly on a regular basis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taylor wants an increase. Where is this money going? How about transparency!
Have you even bothered to look at the details? Almost all
of the increase simply goes to pay and benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any written information provided on the budget yet or just this meeting?
I think it should go up here but hasn't been posted yet: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/budget/
The one page summary has been posted: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GJKuduRVabGklonUKc2u7VmIcBsrbNW/view?usp=drivesdk
Thank you. 50 people from central services is a lot. Did they clarify what jobs will be cut?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reducing elementary class sizes by 1
Reducing elementary class sizes is a good goal, but reducing them by one will have a negligible impact on classrooms. I'd want to see reductions of class size by 3-5 before I clap for Taylor.
So by what amounts to another class? Where are these other classes going to be placed in schools?
If it's reducing class sizes by one, it just means going back to the guidelines in place a couple years ago before they raised them by 1.
With declining enrollment, maybe this is just natural attrition in student numbers than any intentional action by MCPS.
Class size is not the same as absolute size. A school can lose 100 kids and class sizes still stay the same. They just hire fewer teachers. The number of teachers they hire is based on the number of kids they have, and they are talking about adjusting this formula.
Not sure what you mean. If the number of kids at a school drops, but the number of classroom teachers stays the same, the average class size will drop. That doesn't mean all class sizes at that school will drop, but you'd expect that trend over time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reducing elementary class sizes by 1
Reducing elementary class sizes is a good goal, but reducing them by one will have a negligible impact on classrooms. I'd want to see reductions of class size by 3-5 before I clap for Taylor.
So by what amounts to another class? Where are these other classes going to be placed in schools?
If it's reducing class sizes by one, it just means going back to the guidelines in place a couple years ago before they raised them by 1.
With declining enrollment, maybe this is just natural attrition in student numbers than any intentional action by MCPS.
Class size is not the same as absolute size. A school can lose 100 kids and class sizes still stay the same. They just hire fewer teachers. The number of teachers they hire is based on the number of kids they have, and they are talking about adjusting this formula.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reducing elementary class sizes by 1
Reducing elementary class sizes is a good goal, but reducing them by one will have a negligible impact on classrooms. I'd want to see reductions of class size by 3-5 before I clap for Taylor.
So by what amounts to another class? Where are these other classes going to be placed in schools?
If it's reducing class sizes by one, it just means going back to the guidelines in place a couple years ago before they raised them by 1.
With declining enrollment, maybe this is just natural attrition in student numbers than any intentional action by MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any written information provided on the budget yet or just this meeting?
I think it should go up here but hasn't been posted yet: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/budget/
The one page summary has been posted: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GJKuduRVabGklonUKc2u7VmIcBsrbNW/view?usp=drivesdk
Thank you. 50 people from central services is a lot. Did they clarify what jobs will be cut?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reducing elementary class sizes by 1
Reducing elementary class sizes is a good goal, but reducing them by one will have a negligible impact on classrooms. I'd want to see reductions of class size by 3-5 before I clap for Taylor.
So by what amounts to another class? Where are these other classes going to be placed in schools?
If it's reducing class sizes by one, it just means going back to the guidelines in place a couple years ago before they raised them by 1.
Anonymous wrote:Taylor wants an increase. Where is this money going? How about transparency!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reducing elementary class sizes by 1
Reducing elementary class sizes is a good goal, but reducing them by one will have a negligible impact on classrooms. I'd want to see reductions of class size by 3-5 before I clap for Taylor.
So by what amounts to another class? Where are these other classes going to be placed in schools?
This refers to the number of students in each class. So, each class in K-5 will be reduced by one student (on average).