Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will Greenland be the impetus for European countries to boycott the games entirely? A World Cup with Germany,, England, France, Spain, etc? that would be a total PR disaster for Don the Con.
Football fans in those countries care more about the beautiful game than Greenland.
Europe should boycott and host an off cycle euros, and invite the big central and South American teams
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will Greenland be the impetus for European countries to boycott the games entirely? A World Cup with Germany,, England, France, Spain, etc? that would be a total PR disaster for Don the Con.
Football fans in those countries care more about the beautiful game than Greenland.
Anonymous wrote:Will Greenland be the impetus for European countries to boycott the games entirely? A World Cup with Germany,, England, France, Spain, etc? that would be a total PR disaster for Don the Con.
Anonymous wrote:I cannot image many europeans or latin americans coming to the US for this. FIFa should just move the rest of the games to Mexico and Canada.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The World Cup will have a major economic impact for the host countries. It’s a great thing. Silly “boycotts” from people who can’t afford to go anyway aren’t meaningful or impactful.
The World Cup is working to move to another country. It will either be in Europe or China. China is in the lead now.
You’re really bad at this.
Try google
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The World Cup will have a major economic impact for the host countries. It’s a great thing. Silly “boycotts” from people who can’t afford to go anyway aren’t meaningful or impactful.
The World Cup is working to move to another country. It will either be in Europe or China. China is in the lead now.
You’re really bad at this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The World Cup will have a major economic impact for the host countries. It’s a great thing. Silly “boycotts” from people who can’t afford to go anyway aren’t meaningful or impactful.
The World Cup is working to move to another country. It will either be in Europe or China. China is in the lead now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FIFA is famously corrupt. Good to see a boycott. Don’t forget USTA and Rolex too.
This boycott is useless. Stadiums will be full. BTW, people are on waiting lists to buy a Rolex, so that boycott is even dumber.
This poster posted on December 5.
Interesting to see how this post ages.
I don't know a single person--and I know some serious soccer fans--planning to attend the World Cup.
No one wears Rolexes except extremely trashy people. You can have lots of money, but you can't buy good taste.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FIFA is famously corrupt. Good to see a boycott. Don’t forget USTA and Rolex too.
This boycott is useless. Stadiums will be full. BTW, people are on waiting lists to buy a Rolex, so that boycott is even dumber.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The World Cup will have a major economic impact for the host countries. It’s a great thing. Silly “boycotts” from people who can’t afford to go anyway aren’t meaningful or impactful.
The World Cup is working to move to another country. It will either be in Europe or China. China is in the lead now.
Anonymous wrote:The World Cup will have a major economic impact for the host countries. It’s a great thing. Silly “boycotts” from people who can’t afford to go anyway aren’t meaningful or impactful.