Anonymous wrote:Colorado College is definitely a "fit school" in the sense that it is important to be a good match for the campus culture & Colorado outdoor lifestyle. Colorado College is not a Top 20, or even a Top 25, LAC. It's for students who can afford to relax & enjoy four years of undergraduate schooling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid loved it and almost went but got cold feet about the block program. Ended up at a similar SLAC with outdoorsy vibe and more traditional curriculum.
Where did your dc end up and do they like it? One of my kids wants an outdoorsy SLAC…
Here is my kid's list for outdoorsy SLACs:
Colorado College
Colby
Middlebury
St Lawrence
Hamilton
Lafayette
Bates
Dickinson
Hobart & William Smith
Anonymous wrote:Colorado College is definitely a "fit school" in the sense that it is important to be a good match for the campus culture & Colorado outdoor lifestyle. Colorado College is not a Top 20, or even a Top 25, LAC. It's for students who can afford to relax & enjoy four years of undergraduate schooling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not choose it. I live close to it. It is a nice campus and the city is growing, but the block program does not allow for learning over time, which is the best way for kids to acquire and retain information. If you have a course that you don’t really like or a professor that you don’t care for, you’re stuck the whole block. That can be dealt with, but it’s just a weird way to go to school, I think. It would be easier for kids who have trouble with executive functioning. It’s a ton of money for no real advantage, I think.
And it may be a disadvantage for those who want to transfer out after their first or second year. I believe that this is one reason for the solid retention rate of 93%.
or it could be that kids love it and don't want to leave
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not choose it. I live close to it. It is a nice campus and the city is growing, but the block program does not allow for learning over time, which is the best way for kids to acquire and retain information. If you have a course that you don’t really like or a professor that you don’t care for, you’re stuck the whole block. That can be dealt with, but it’s just a weird way to go to school, I think. It would be easier for kids who have trouble with executive functioning. It’s a ton of money for no real advantage, I think.
And it may be a disadvantage for those who want to transfer out after their first or second year. I believe that this is one reason for the solid retention rate of 93%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid loved it and almost went but got cold feet about the block program. Ended up at a similar SLAC with outdoorsy vibe and more traditional curriculum.
Where did your dc end up and do they like it? One of my kids wants an outdoorsy SLAC…
Here is my kid's list for outdoorsy SLACs:
Colorado College
Colby
Middlebury
St Lawrence
Hamilton
Lafayette
Bates
Dickinson
Hobart & William Smith
Interesting. Never viewed Dickinson College as "outdoorsy".
It's very close to the AT, so it made the list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid loved it and almost went but got cold feet about the block program. Ended up at a similar SLAC with outdoorsy vibe and more traditional curriculum.
Where did your dc end up and do they like it? One of my kids wants an outdoorsy SLAC…
Here is my kid's list for outdoorsy SLACs:
Colorado College
Colby
Middlebury
St Lawrence
Hamilton
Lafayette
Bates
Dickinson
Hobart & William Smith
Interesting. Never viewed Dickinson College as "outdoorsy".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid loved it and almost went but got cold feet about the block program. Ended up at a similar SLAC with outdoorsy vibe and more traditional curriculum.
Where did your dc end up and do they like it? One of my kids wants an outdoorsy SLAC…
Here is my kid's list for outdoorsy SLACs:
Colorado College
Colby
Middlebury
St Lawrence
Hamilton
Lafayette
Bates
Dickinson
Hobart & William Smith
Anonymous wrote:I would not choose it. I live close to it. It is a nice campus and the city is growing, but the block program does not allow for learning over time, which is the best way for kids to acquire and retain information. If you have a course that you don’t really like or a professor that you don’t care for, you’re stuck the whole block. That can be dealt with, but it’s just a weird way to go to school, I think. It would be easier for kids who have trouble with executive functioning. It’s a ton of money for no real advantage, I think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid loved it and almost went but got cold feet about the block program. Ended up at a similar SLAC with outdoorsy vibe and more traditional curriculum.
Where did your dc end up and do they like it? One of my kids wants an outdoorsy SLAC…
Here is my kid's list for outdoorsy SLACs:
Colorado College
Colby
Middlebury
St Lawrence
Hamilton
Lafayette
Bates
Dickinson
Hobart & William Smith
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid loved it and almost went but got cold feet about the block program. Ended up at a similar SLAC with outdoorsy vibe and more traditional curriculum.
Where did your dc end up and do they like it? One of my kids wants an outdoorsy SLAC…