Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Not according to the article…says girls are performing better on every academic metric overall compared to boys, including SAT scores.

"Boys also have lower mean scores on the SAT "

Fewer woman than men have high scores (intelligence).

https://aibm.org/research/boys-girls-and-grades-examining-gpa-and-sat-trends/

I was shocked when I learned that over the years there have been SAT question types that women systematically perform better on. And that the test has been redesigned to remove or reduce those question types that advantage women. Apparently people (still) have fewer issues with a test that leads to men outperforming at the high end.

I was a National Merit Finalist in my day. However I benefited from the 2x verbal score bump. I have my own thoughts on why that exists. But I'm not less intelligent than the math nerd boys who shared that honor with me. I just didn't care about math in elementary school. And they didn't care to read Dickens and Shakespeare in high school.

I have a whole family full of National Merit Commendeds and Finalists and kids not recognized at all. The differences in their scores are not intelligence-based in my opinion. It relates to love of school, amount of reading, math track they got on in elementary school, how good their memory is, and whether they are precise in their work habits. Those are what I think drive a lot of differences in scores at the high end. How intellectually tracked and prepped you are from early childhood and how much you care. Plus now there's much more tutoring and self-study resources.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Not according to the article…says girls are performing better on every academic metric overall compared to boys, including SAT scores.

"Boys also have lower mean scores on the SAT "

Fewer woman than men have high scores (intelligence).

https://aibm.org/research/boys-girls-and-grades-examining-gpa-and-sat-trends/

I know math is hard for many guys. Do you need us to explain statistics?

DP. If you are going to explain statistics be sure to cover variance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Not according to the article…says girls are performing better on every academic metric overall compared to boys, including SAT scores.

"Boys also have lower mean scores on the SAT "

Fewer woman than men have high scores (intelligence).

https://aibm.org/research/boys-girls-and-grades-examining-gpa-and-sat-trends/

I know math is hard for many guys. Do you need us to explain statistics?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Not according to the article…says girls are performing better on every academic metric overall compared to boys, including SAT scores.

"Boys also have lower mean scores on the SAT "

Fewer woman than men have high scores (intelligence).

https://aibm.org/research/boys-girls-and-grades-examining-gpa-and-sat-trends/

Has AIBM been cancelled by MAGA yet for pushing DEI?

OP, the answer is no because Trump will be dead soon, and because conservative women scream when there aren't enough boys for their daughters to Mrs with and get impregnate by to Save The White Race.

Girls-only schools will fall before gender balanced schools will.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Not according to the article…says girls are performing better on every academic metric overall compared to boys, including SAT scores.

"Boys also have lower mean scores on the SAT "

Fewer woman than men have high scores (intelligence).

https://aibm.org/research/boys-girls-and-grades-examining-gpa-and-sat-trends/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The operative word in the story (also reported in Hechinger) is “may”. Everyone quoted in the article, including the author, is liberal. No one from the administration is quoted. This is a story ginned up to create hysteria. There is no proof of what the author thinks “may” happen. There are no federal actions on the matter. I’m in higher education and have seen no action along this line.

The Washington Post has lost all credibility.

+1. This is an absurd piece with absolutely no proof. It’s all conjecture with opinions given only by left wing union groups (also guessing) as “support”. Not one single official who might actually know is quoted.

Ironic since Bezos is a Trump bootlicker.

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Not according to the article…says girls are performing better on every academic metric overall compared to boys, including SAT scores.

Anonymous wrote:No way is my daughter attending school in those backwater. Scarlet letter, handmaids tale southern states. Not a chance.

Your point may be lost with your punctuation errors. Just sayin’.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women will certainly flock to top schools in blue states to avoid the misogyny in the south.

I know more girls flocking to SEC schools and schools in the SE, S and Texas than in the NE.

Sure you do.

Most girls who have the stats for top schools aren’t heading to backwards red states.

In the south land, we just don’t get bent out of shape about the Yankees. You do you!!!

Anonymous wrote:Women will certainly flock to top schools in blue states to avoid the misogyny in the south.

Lmao! Every girl dreams of being a Belle!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The operative word in the story (also reported in Hechinger) is “may”. Everyone quoted in the article, including the author, is liberal. No one from the administration is quoted. This is a story ginned up to create hysteria. There is no proof of what the author thinks “may” happen. There are no federal actions on the matter. I’m in higher education and have seen no action along this line.

The Washington Post has lost all credibility.

+1. This is an absurd piece with absolutely no proof. It’s all conjecture with opinions given only by left wing union groups (also guessing) as “support”. Not one single official who might actually know is quoted.

Anonymous wrote:There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.

Utter nonsense.

There would be more boys if you emphasized SAT scores.