Anonymous wrote:We are sliding back to the dark ages.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how fraternities and sororities, or gendered sports teams (like football) can continue, if a women’s magazine is forbidden.
Anonymous wrote:DEI is a form of racist bigotry. It is sad and appalling so many in the United States in 2025 cannot acknowledge this simple fact.
Anonymous wrote:I’d want to know a LOT more about this decision than I trust Politico to report.
Anonymous wrote:DEI is a form of racist bigotry. It is sad and appalling so many in the United States in 2025 cannot acknowledge this simple fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else think it’s weird that this administration is obsessed with supposedly protecting women’s sports and women’s bathrooms but are shutting down a women’s magazine?
Maybe they should rename the magazine Pat and then have articles about makeup for both sexes and about how masculinity culture hurts men in fields like childcare, as well as how misogyny hurts women in heavy metal. Would that be better?
No, they don’t give a shit about women’s sports. These are the same people who squawked about the end of the world when Title IX was being debated. They will sneer at the WNBA and female umpires.
Anonymous wrote:DEI is a form of racist bigotry. It is sad and appalling so many in the United States in 2025 cannot acknowledge this simple fact.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how fraternities and sororities, or gendered sports teams (like football) can continue, if a women’s magazine is forbidden.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both publications were founded upon and furthered DEI.
DEI perpetuates racial divisions rather than fostering unity.
Further, the mandatory DEI training required at most universities has been shown to increase prejudice among participants, rather than ameliorating the problem.
Racist/misogynist apologists are what foster division.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t this the same crowd who believes in viewpoint diversity or whatever made up issue they create to defend their ideas and their ideas only?
If you read the rubric the professor specifically gave disagreement as an option.
This is a meaningless tangent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t this the same crowd who believes in viewpoint diversity or whatever made up issue they create to defend their ideas and their ideas only?
If you read the rubric the professor specifically gave disagreement as an option.