Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?
My kid played 3 varsity sports in hs, captain of 2, mvp, all-state, all-met, but only had room on activities list to list 1 and that was at the bottom.Yes, sports was important to him, but not the most important thing he did during hs
WTH were his other activities?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?
My kid played 3 varsity sports in hs, captain of 2, mvp, all-state, all-met, but only had room on activities list to list 1 and that was at the bottom.Yes, sports was important to him, but not the most important thing he did during hs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?
Anonymous wrote:In the other thread about cuts, everyone mentioned how you many kids on travel teams since 8 don’t pass freshman tryouts in high school. Even if your kid is lucky enough to make varsity, it doesn’t matter much for admissions. It’s just crazy when it’s so hard to make the high school team
Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The main arguments in this thread are ones I have made before: I wish colleges rewarded the kids who make contributions to their high school community through long-standing activities, whatever that looks like (varsity athlete, marching band, lead in the, play yearbook editor etc) because those roles really help the community. Like it or not, a high school benefits when they have a great team, marching band, or a play worth seeing. And, being the lead, varsity captain or newspaper editor is significant time and provides kids with a lot of skills (running for office, extra training, meeting consistent deadlines, leading a group). Also, say the team makes the state tournament: a playoff run increases season length, requires skill, and a level of dedication that a random JV kid never has to make. That feels more significant to me than the kid who started up a “pointy” club to deliver period products to Africa a few times a year or list a hobby on their activities list. The kids who do the school clubs are generally also vetted through a selection process and probably have decent social skills. I am also very much for service work in a kid’s home community (if a kid is going to the local homeless shelter every day after school in lieu of practice that is great too).
I also think a kid who manages to take electives rather than study halls should get a bump yet colleges don’t seem to care. My kids have always needed the study halls should but the kids who do studio art in all their free periods manage a lot more, imo, because they have to take their homework home.
THEY DO.
But you still have to present a great academic profile. Show that you have the right priorities. Can buckle down and be a good student while also being involved. This isn't rocket science.
+1 you can’t sacrifice grades for sports.
We had an “academics first” policy in our house. We didn’t miss school for club sports and were asked to do so a lot. Grades had to be kept up. My kids excelled in sports (recruited low level sports schools), but had the grades and scores to be admitted unhooked to an Ivy. It shows time management and dedication.
And what happens if your kids doesn’t give their full effort for the sport to the point where they fail tryouts?
They find another activity that is fun to do. They should know that the #1 priority is school. Then comes activities.
It’s very hard to do that for sports when they expect 30+ hours of work per week to maybe make JV
Are you saying they have zero interests or hobbies outside of the sport and are incapable of finding one or two? That's kind of...sad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The main arguments in this thread are ones I have made before: I wish colleges rewarded the kids who make contributions to their high school community through long-standing activities, whatever that looks like (varsity athlete, marching band, lead in the, play yearbook editor etc) because those roles really help the community. Like it or not, a high school benefits when they have a great team, marching band, or a play worth seeing. And, being the lead, varsity captain or newspaper editor is significant time and provides kids with a lot of skills (running for office, extra training, meeting consistent deadlines, leading a group). Also, say the team makes the state tournament: a playoff run increases season length, requires skill, and a level of dedication that a random JV kid never has to make. That feels more significant to me than the kid who started up a “pointy” club to deliver period products to Africa a few times a year or list a hobby on their activities list. The kids who do the school clubs are generally also vetted through a selection process and probably have decent social skills. I am also very much for service work in a kid’s home community (if a kid is going to the local homeless shelter every day after school in lieu of practice that is great too).
I also think a kid who manages to take electives rather than study halls should get a bump yet colleges don’t seem to care. My kids have always needed the study halls should but the kids who do studio art in all their free periods manage a lot more, imo, because they have to take their homework home.
THEY DO.
But you still have to present a great academic profile. Show that you have the right priorities. Can buckle down and be a good student while also being involved. This isn't rocket science.
+1 you can’t sacrifice grades for sports.
We had an “academics first” policy in our house. We didn’t miss school for club sports and were asked to do so a lot. Grades had to be kept up. My kids excelled in sports (recruited low level sports schools), but had the grades and scores to be admitted unhooked to an Ivy. It shows time management and dedication.
And what happens if your kids doesn’t give their full effort for the sport to the point where they fail tryouts?
They find another activity that is fun to do. They should know that the #1 priority is school. Then comes activities.
It’s very hard to do that for sports when they expect 30+ hours of work per week to maybe make JV
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it is frustrating when the time commitment is enormous. I would hope that schools would give some "credit" to a kid who plays a varsity sport and manages to do well academically because that type of work ethic will get them far in life, even if it may not help with college admissions.
It does help with college admissions. Who says it doesn't?
Ignore the ignorant posters here. They know nothing. Their kids are nerds so they think sports are pointless. They know nothing.
Nerds are the ones who are going to actually make scientific and medical breakthroughs. Your kids sound like they’ll just be PE leeches on the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The main arguments in this thread are ones I have made before: I wish colleges rewarded the kids who make contributions to their high school community through long-standing activities, whatever that looks like (varsity athlete, marching band, lead in the, play yearbook editor etc) because those roles really help the community. Like it or not, a high school benefits when they have a great team, marching band, or a play worth seeing. And, being the lead, varsity captain or newspaper editor is significant time and provides kids with a lot of skills (running for office, extra training, meeting consistent deadlines, leading a group). Also, say the team makes the state tournament: a playoff run increases season length, requires skill, and a level of dedication that a random JV kid never has to make. That feels more significant to me than the kid who started up a “pointy” club to deliver period products to Africa a few times a year or list a hobby on their activities list. The kids who do the school clubs are generally also vetted through a selection process and probably have decent social skills. I am also very much for service work in a kid’s home community (if a kid is going to the local homeless shelter every day after school in lieu of practice that is great too).
I also think a kid who manages to take electives rather than study halls should get a bump yet colleges don’t seem to care. My kids have always needed the study halls should but the kids who do studio art in all their free periods manage a lot more, imo, because they have to take their homework home.
THEY DO.
But you still have to present a great academic profile. Show that you have the right priorities. Can buckle down and be a good student while also being involved. This isn't rocket science.
+1 you can’t sacrifice grades for sports.
We had an “academics first” policy in our house. We didn’t miss school for club sports and were asked to do so a lot. Grades had to be kept up. My kids excelled in sports (recruited low level sports schools), but had the grades and scores to be admitted unhooked to an Ivy. It shows time management and dedication.
And what happens if your kids doesn’t give their full effort for the sport to the point where they fail tryouts?
They find another activity that is fun to do. They should know that the #1 priority is school. Then comes activities.